Photoshop How To Use: Feb 27, 2009

Friday, February 27, 2009

[ellenspsp_sharing] Clover's Daydream. Masks and Kit - by Sabre

~~~

Here is my new scrapkit.
Named after my daughter, Clover.
Have fun and it's FTU.
Love in the chaos,
Sabre

DOWNLOAD HERE

__._,_.___

Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

__,_._,___

[ellenspsp_sharing] FBRTubz_as blue as_sinanTR, S&S

Babel Fish Translator

If you'd like to receive my tubes
Please send request to me via email at FBRTubz

Fourbr
*..·´°*°·..*..·°**©**°·..*..·´°*°·..*
One of the saddest things in a Woman's life...
Is to believe the child within her is gone forever...
She is only playing hide and seek...
____________________________________________________________
FBRTubz
Are for your personal non-profit use only and may not be put on any web page without written permission. FBRTubz may NOT be uploaded to ANY web share site for others to d/l from with out written permission. DO NOT change file name, my signature, previews or alter in any way ...
You may share or forward FBRTubz as long as you keep all file names intact along with
original previews.
If you have any questions about my tubes please contact Fourbr
I Need to go on Hold Fourbr
To be Removed Fourbr
_____________________________________________________________

You have requested to be on this list.
YOUR REQUEST TO JOIN EMAIL IS SAVED IN LIEU OF A SIGNED DISCLAIMER
In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, any copyrighted work in this message is being distributed under fair use without profit or payment to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for nonprofit research and educational or criticism purposes only. Notwithstanding the provisions of sections 106 and 106A, the fair use of a copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in copies or photo records or by any other means specified by that section, for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or
research, is not an infringementU.S. Copyright Office - Fair Use v
Fair Use in Copyright (BitLaw) v Stanford Copyright & Fair Use - Measuring Fair Use: The Four Factorshttp://whatiscopyright.org/ V http://www.rightsforartists.com/faqs.html

RE: [photoshop-beginners] update help

Cathy –

If your ISP is “flagging” you, I’d find out more details as to when they are seeing a problem, and what it is related to (and yes, they can tell). I have never had an issue with Photoshop / Adobe doing updates. You might have something else going on, or if they are complaining about those updates, then THEY have issues. I just got done doing a Microsoft update that was over 300MB.

Todd

From: photoshop-beginners@yahoogroups.com [mailto:photoshop-beginners@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Cathy Wolfe
Sent: Thursday, February 26, 2009 6:22 PM
To: photoshop-beginners@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [photoshop-beginners] update help

Hi, I just put Web Premuim CS3 on my desktop and now I am getting
browned out by my service provider for using too much band width. I am
sure that it was the big update that Adobe did automatically, that put
me over. I have been trying in vain to find a way to set the updates
for 3-5 am when we are given more leeway over bandwidth. But I can't
find any way to do that.

When I click on 'Help', I can choose to update now, but there is no
'Properties' button so that I can set a time for updating. Since my
other programs can be set, I can't imagine that Adobe did not build
that in somewhere. If anyone could help me, I would really appreciate
it since I am getting frustrated by being browned out.

Thanks so much,

Cathy

__._,_.___

Please check out our sister group, attachments allowed-Photoshop by Example http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ps-by-ex/ =========Members Map http://www.frappr.com/photoshopbeginners ========

__,_._,___

[PSP-Snags] BONNE ET DOUCE NUIT GROS BISOUSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS

Bisous de Tina

Papier offert par Tina

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
PSP-Snags Google group: http://groups.google.com/group/PSP-Snags
Send to: psp-snags@googlegroups.com
Uunsubscribe: psp-snags-unsubscribe@googlegroups.com

http://groups.google.com/group/Cartoon-PSP * http://groups.google.com/group/Disney-Tubes * http://groups.google.com/group/PSP-Snags-Adult * http://I-Love-Tutorials.com/chat * http://I-Love-PSP.com * http://PSP.I-Love-Disney.com * http://I-Love-Cartoons.com * http://I-Love-Disney.com * http://KTimothy.com * http://Disney-Stationary.com * http://Disney-Kingdom.com * http://Disney-Clipart.com

This is a private email and is covered by TITLE 18, PART I, CHAPTER 47, Sec. 1030 and Internet Privacy Law. Sharing done, within this group, is for personal use only - NOT FOR PROFIT
NO COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT IS INTENDED.
Group owner is not responsible for the sends/opinions of its members
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

rec.photo.digital - 25 new messages in 9 topics - digest

rec.photo.digital
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.photo.digital?hl=en

rec.photo.digital@googlegroups.com

Today's topics:

==============================================================================
TOPIC: Long lens options
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.photo.digital/t/484fe667d2c46c51?hl=en
==============================================================================

== 1 of 3 ==
Date: Fri, Feb 27 2009 7:31 am
From: Don Stauffer

My wife and I both have zooms that go out to 300mm, but occasionally
we'd like a longer option. I don't want to spend a lot of money, 'cause
we wouldn't use it that often.

Which do folks think would have better performance- a 2X converter, or
one of those 600mm "mirror" lenses?

Does anyone know what optical configuration those mirror lenses are- are
they Cassegrains, or Newtonians (flat folding lens), or something
entirely different?

== 2 of 3 ==
Date: Fri, Feb 27 2009 8:16 am
From: M-M

In article <49a80743$0$87068$815e3792@news.qwest.net>,
Don Stauffer <stauffer@usfamily.net> wrote:

> My wife and I both have zooms that go out to 300mm, but occasionally
> we'd like a longer option. I don't want to spend a lot of money, 'cause
> we wouldn't use it that often.
>
> Which do folks think would have better performance- a 2X converter, or
> one of those 600mm "mirror" lenses?
>
> Does anyone know what optical configuration those mirror lenses are- are
> they Cassegrains, or Newtonians (flat folding lens), or something
> entirely different?

I think you'd be better off with a spotting scope than a mirror lens.
The aperture will be about the same but the bokeh on a mirror lens is
horrific.

--
m-m
http://www.mhmyers.com

== 3 of 3 ==
Date: Fri, Feb 27 2009 11:46 am
From: "DD-Diver"

"M-M" <nospam.m-m@ny.more> schreef in bericht
news:nospam.m-m-9837C1.11165427022009@cpe-76-190-186-198.neo.res.rr.com...
> In article <49a80743$0$87068$815e3792@news.qwest.net>,
> Don Stauffer <stauffer@usfamily.net> wrote:
>
>> My wife and I both have zooms that go out to 300mm, but occasionally
>> we'd like a longer option. I don't want to spend a lot of money, 'cause
>> we wouldn't use it that often.
>>
>> Which do folks think would have better performance- a 2X converter, or
>> one of those 600mm "mirror" lenses?
>>
>> Does anyone know what optical configuration those mirror lenses are- are
>> they Cassegrains, or Newtonians (flat folding lens), or something
>> entirely different?
>
>
> I think you'd be better off with a spotting scope than a mirror lens.
> The aperture will be about the same but the bokeh on a mirror lens is
> horrific.
>
> --
> m-m
> http://www.mhmyers.com

For one, the "bokeh" is horrific, for me, it was exactly that donut-shape of
unsharp spots that made buy one (Sigma 600), it gives great creative
possibilities.

OP: "mirrors" are catadioptric,see also:
http://photo.net/learn/optics/mirrors/ ...article dates from 2003.

"mirrors" are manual focus only, and have a fixed aparture. Decades ago
Pentax made a 400-600 mirror zoom.., actually, there is one on E-Bay right
now. I would love to have something like that for my Canon!

If your current setup is compatible with a 2x-converter, I would try that
option first, probably a lot cheaper, and you can aways sell the converter
later.

==============================================================================
TOPIC: Reading on paper vs "screening" online and "screening" on a Kindle
Screener
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.photo.digital/t/eee1f550dcc6ae4a?hl=en
==============================================================================

== 1 of 2 ==
Date: Fri, Feb 27 2009 7:33 am
From: Don Stauffer

I do NOT share your concern. To me the term reading does not limit the
medium. I read writing on billboards, movie screens, CRTs, or whatever.

I never could see why keyboarding was not typing :-(

danbloom wrote:
> Reading on paper vs "screening" online and "screening" on a Kindle
> Screener
>
> I am curious to know if any other people here share my concerns about
> the need for a new word in English, and other languages, too, for
> READING ONLINE, to differentiate this activity from reading on paper,
> which is a very different animal.
>
> See two blogs I am on here: one in China, the other in USA:
>
> http://zippy1300.blogspot.com
>
> http://www.36pr.com/2009/02/27/6-on-36-qa-with-taiwan-based-reporter-dan-bloom-on-screening/
>
> AND in other languages, how does one different reading text on paper
> surface to reading text on a screen online? Do tell.
>
> Email me offline for any followups too.
>
> danbloom AT gmail DOT com

== 2 of 2 ==
Date: Fri, Feb 27 2009 8:26 am
From: Spamm Trappe

On Fri, 27 Feb 2009 05:23:05 -0800 (PST), danbloom wrote:
>
> I am curious to know if any other people here share my concerns about
> the need for a new word in English, and other languages, too, for
> READING ONLINE,

sigh... Another frickin' google groper.

I am curious *why you think this is On Topic in rec.photo.digital* !!

==============================================================================
TOPIC: Abercrombie and Fitch Women Jeans & Pants - discount
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.photo.digital/t/effb3f349b2ccee1?hl=en
==============================================================================

== 1 of 1 ==
Date: Fri, Feb 27 2009 7:51 am
From: sxhhuangshuixian@gmail.com

Where can go to find Abercrombie and Fitch Women Jeans & Pants?
now We have a good collection of Abercrombie and Fitch Women Jeans &
Pants in different styles and different colors.

Please see them :
http://www.luxury-fashion.org/static/Apparels/Abercrombie-and-Fitch-Women-Pants-23.html
http://www.luxury-fashion.org/static/Apparels/Abercrombie-and-Fitch-Women-Pants-24.html

Our Abercrombie and Fitch Women Jeans & Pants are fine quality
And find more new fashion cloth,shoes and apparels please view :
http://www.luxury-fashion.org

Welcome check our other pages or feel free contact us.
You can find what do you want here!

==============================================================================
TOPIC: Your Favorite Photo Posting Sites? (Nope. Not Trolling.)
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.photo.digital/t/d6529156025c7f2f?hl=en
==============================================================================

== 1 of 11 ==
Date: Fri, Feb 27 2009 8:26 am
From: ray

On Thu, 26 Feb 2009 20:35:27 -0800, Twibil wrote:

> I understand that there are both free and pay sites, but I've yet to
> find a breakdown anywhere that compares services offered, user
> friendliness, bang for your buck (in the case of the pay sites),
> etcetera.
>
> So with some trepidation, and no little antici..................pation,
> I await your concensus.
>
> What sites do you personally use and recommend, and why?
>
> (Bear in mind that I can boot up a computer -and not a lot more.) ~Pete

I prefer my own personal web site where I can do what I want for a fixed
fee - $5/month with netfirms.

== 2 of 11 ==
Date: Fri, Feb 27 2009 8:43 am
From: zekfrivo@zekfrivolous.com (GregS)

In article <70qigtF8opnpU24@mid.individual.net>, ray <ray@zianet.com> wrote:
>On Thu, 26 Feb 2009 20:35:27 -0800, Twibil wrote:
>
>> I understand that there are both free and pay sites, but I've yet to
>> find a breakdown anywhere that compares services offered, user
>> friendliness, bang for your buck (in the case of the pay sites),
>> etcetera.
>>
>> So with some trepidation, and no little antici..................pation,
>> I await your concensus.
>>
>> What sites do you personally use and recommend, and why?
>>
>> (Bear in mind that I can boot up a computer -and not a lot more.) ~Pete
>
>I prefer my own personal web site where I can do what I want for a fixed
>fee - $5/month with netfirms.

I keep seeing an old website, I guess free, that has not been shut off since the owner died
on netfirms.

Well last I looked I have at least 300GB storage on my Ipower website.
If you pay on a 2 year basis, its about $6 mo.

What does Comcast give you, I have not figured that out because I have not investigated.
Its rare to see web pages on Comcast webspace. I know they took away USENET.
Its free. I see 1 GB from some source, but I have not been able to do anything
yeat after enabling Comcast webspace.

I mostly use ACDSee to generate thumnailed picture viewing.

greg

== 3 of 11 ==
Date: Fri, Feb 27 2009 8:45 am
From: zekfrivo@zekfrivolous.com (GregS)

In article <go9583$i77$1@usenet01.srv.cis.pitt.edu>, zekfrivo@zekfrivolous.com (GregS) wrote:
>In article <70qigtF8opnpU24@mid.individual.net>, ray <ray@zianet.com> wrote:
>>On Thu, 26 Feb 2009 20:35:27 -0800, Twibil wrote:
>>
>>> I understand that there are both free and pay sites, but I've yet to
>>> find a breakdown anywhere that compares services offered, user
>>> friendliness, bang for your buck (in the case of the pay sites),
>>> etcetera.
>>>
>>> So with some trepidation, and no little antici..................pation,
>>> I await your concensus.
>>>
>>> What sites do you personally use and recommend, and why?
>>>
>>> (Bear in mind that I can boot up a computer -and not a lot more.) ~Pete
>>
>>I prefer my own personal web site where I can do what I want for a fixed
>>fee - $5/month with netfirms.
>
>I keep seeing an old website, I guess free, that has not been shut off since
> the owner died
>on netfirms.
>
>Well last I looked I have at least 300GB storage on my Ipower website.
>If you pay on a 2 year basis, its about $6 mo.
>
>What does Comcast give you, I have not figured that out because I have not
> investigated.
>Its rare to see web pages on Comcast webspace. I know they took away USENET.
>Its free. I see 1 GB from some source, but I have not been able to do anything
>yeat after enabling Comcast webspace.
>
>I mostly use ACDSee to generate thumnailed picture viewing.
>

If you use your own site, you can make thumails any size and pictures any size.

greg

== 4 of 11 ==
Date: Fri, Feb 27 2009 9:08 am
From: zekfrivo@zekfrivolous.com (GregS)

In article <go95ac$i77$2@usenet01.srv.cis.pitt.edu>, zekfrivo@zekfrivolous.com (GregS) wrote:
>In article <go9583$i77$1@usenet01.srv.cis.pitt.edu>, zekfrivo@zekfrivolous.com
> (GregS) wrote:
>>In article <70qigtF8opnpU24@mid.individual.net>, ray <ray@zianet.com> wrote:
>>>On Thu, 26 Feb 2009 20:35:27 -0800, Twibil wrote:
>>>
>>>> I understand that there are both free and pay sites, but I've yet to
>>>> find a breakdown anywhere that compares services offered, user
>>>> friendliness, bang for your buck (in the case of the pay sites),
>>>> etcetera.
>>>>
>>>> So with some trepidation, and no little antici..................pation,
>>>> I await your concensus.
>>>>
>>>> What sites do you personally use and recommend, and why?
>>>>
>>>> (Bear in mind that I can boot up a computer -and not a lot more.) ~Pete
>>>
>>>I prefer my own personal web site where I can do what I want for a fixed
>>>fee - $5/month with netfirms.
>>
>>I keep seeing an old website, I guess free, that has not been shut off since
>> the owner died
>>on netfirms.
>>
>>Well last I looked I have at least 300GB storage on my Ipower website.
>>If you pay on a 2 year basis, its about $6 mo.
>>
>>What does Comcast give you, I have not figured that out because I have not
>> investigated.
>>Its rare to see web pages on Comcast webspace. I know they took away USENET.
>>Its free. I see 1 GB from some source, but I have not been able to do anything
>>yeat after enabling Comcast webspace.
>>
>>I mostly use ACDSee to generate thumnailed picture viewing.
>>
>
>If you use your own site, you can make thumails any size and pictures any size.
>

Most all web providers provide free web space. I took a few moments and
set up my FREE Comcast space.

Here is what I set up.

https://home.comcast.net/~zekor/home/page_01.htm

greg

== 5 of 11 ==
Date: Fri, Feb 27 2009 9:33 am
From: zekfrivo@zekfrivolous.com (GregS)

In article <go96ls$ins$1@usenet01.srv.cis.pitt.edu>, zekfrivo@zekfrivolous.com (GregS) wrote:
>In article <go95ac$i77$2@usenet01.srv.cis.pitt.edu>, zekfrivo@zekfrivolous.com
> (GregS) wrote:
>>In article <go9583$i77$1@usenet01.srv.cis.pitt.edu>, zekfrivo@zekfrivolous.com
>> (GregS) wrote:
>>>In article <70qigtF8opnpU24@mid.individual.net>, ray <ray@zianet.com> wrote:
>>>>On Thu, 26 Feb 2009 20:35:27 -0800, Twibil wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I understand that there are both free and pay sites, but I've yet to
>>>>> find a breakdown anywhere that compares services offered, user
>>>>> friendliness, bang for your buck (in the case of the pay sites),
>>>>> etcetera.
>>>>>
>>>>> So with some trepidation, and no little antici..................pation,
>>>>> I await your concensus.
>>>>>
>>>>> What sites do you personally use and recommend, and why?
>>>>>
>>>>> (Bear in mind that I can boot up a computer -and not a lot more.) ~Pete
>>>>
>>>>I prefer my own personal web site where I can do what I want for a fixed
>>>>fee - $5/month with netfirms.
>>>
>>>I keep seeing an old website, I guess free, that has not been shut off since
>>> the owner died
>>>on netfirms.
>>>
>>>Well last I looked I have at least 300GB storage on my Ipower website.
>>>If you pay on a 2 year basis, its about $6 mo.
>>>
>>>What does Comcast give you, I have not figured that out because I have not
>>> investigated.
>>>Its rare to see web pages on Comcast webspace. I know they took away USENET.
>>>Its free. I see 1 GB from some source, but I have not been able to do
> anything
>>>yeat after enabling Comcast webspace.
>>>
>>>I mostly use ACDSee to generate thumnailed picture viewing.
>>>
>>
>>If you use your own site, you can make thumails any size and pictures any
> size.
>>
>
>
>Most all web providers provide free web space. I took a few moments and
>set up my FREE Comcast space.
>
>Here is what I set up.
>
>https://home.comcast.net/~zekor/home/page_01.htm
>

Alternately, my new home page.......

https://home.comcast.net/~zekor/home/

== 6 of 11 ==
Date: Fri, Feb 27 2009 9:34 am
From: zekfrivo@zekfrivolous.com (GregS)

In article <go9855$j41$1@usenet01.srv.cis.pitt.edu>, zekfrivo@zekfrivolous.com (GregS) wrote:
>In article <go96ls$ins$1@usenet01.srv.cis.pitt.edu>, zekfrivo@zekfrivolous.com
> (GregS) wrote:
>>In article <go95ac$i77$2@usenet01.srv.cis.pitt.edu>, zekfrivo@zekfrivolous.com
>> (GregS) wrote:
>>>In article <go9583$i77$1@usenet01.srv.cis.pitt.edu>,
> zekfrivo@zekfrivolous.com
>>> (GregS) wrote:
>>>>In article <70qigtF8opnpU24@mid.individual.net>, ray <ray@zianet.com> wrote:
>>>>>On Thu, 26 Feb 2009 20:35:27 -0800, Twibil wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> I understand that there are both free and pay sites, but I've yet to
>>>>>> find a breakdown anywhere that compares services offered, user
>>>>>> friendliness, bang for your buck (in the case of the pay sites),
>>>>>> etcetera.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> So with some trepidation, and no little antici..................pation,
>>>>>> I await your concensus.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> What sites do you personally use and recommend, and why?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> (Bear in mind that I can boot up a computer -and not a lot more.) ~Pete
>>>>>
>>>>>I prefer my own personal web site where I can do what I want for a fixed
>>>>>fee - $5/month with netfirms.
>>>>
>>>>I keep seeing an old website, I guess free, that has not been shut off since
>>>> the owner died
>>>>on netfirms.
>>>>
>>>>Well last I looked I have at least 300GB storage on my Ipower website.
>>>>If you pay on a 2 year basis, its about $6 mo.
>>>>
>>>>What does Comcast give you, I have not figured that out because I have not
>>>> investigated.
>>>>Its rare to see web pages on Comcast webspace. I know they took away USENET.
>>>>Its free. I see 1 GB from some source, but I have not been able to do
>> anything
>>>>yeat after enabling Comcast webspace.
>>>>
>>>>I mostly use ACDSee to generate thumnailed picture viewing.
>>>>
>>>
>>>If you use your own site, you can make thumails any size and pictures any
>> size.
>>>
>>
>>
>>Most all web providers provide free web space. I took a few moments and
>>set up my FREE Comcast space.
>>
>>Here is what I set up.
>>
>>https://home.comcast.net/~zekor/home/page_01.htm
>>
>
>Alternately, my new home page.......
>
>https://home.comcast.net/~zekor/home/

It also works without the s https

http://home.comcast.net/~zekor/home/

== 7 of 11 ==
Date: Fri, Feb 27 2009 9:39 am
From: zekfrivo@zekfrivolous.com (GregS)

In article <go987d$j41$2@usenet01.srv.cis.pitt.edu>, zekfrivo@zekfrivolous.com (GregS) wrote:
>In article <go9855$j41$1@usenet01.srv.cis.pitt.edu>, zekfrivo@zekfrivolous.com
> (GregS) wrote:
>>In article <go96ls$ins$1@usenet01.srv.cis.pitt.edu>, zekfrivo@zekfrivolous.com
>> (GregS) wrote:
>>>In article <go95ac$i77$2@usenet01.srv.cis.pitt.edu>,
> zekfrivo@zekfrivolous.com
>>> (GregS) wrote:
>>>>In article <go9583$i77$1@usenet01.srv.cis.pitt.edu>,
>> zekfrivo@zekfrivolous.com
>>>> (GregS) wrote:
>>>>>In article <70qigtF8opnpU24@mid.individual.net>, ray <ray@zianet.com>
> wrote:
>>>>>>On Thu, 26 Feb 2009 20:35:27 -0800, Twibil wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I understand that there are both free and pay sites, but I've yet to
>>>>>>> find a breakdown anywhere that compares services offered, user
>>>>>>> friendliness, bang for your buck (in the case of the pay sites),
>>>>>>> etcetera.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> So with some trepidation, and no little antici..................pation,
>>>>>>> I await your concensus.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> What sites do you personally use and recommend, and why?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> (Bear in mind that I can boot up a computer -and not a lot more.) ~Pete
>>>>>>
>>>>>>I prefer my own personal web site where I can do what I want for a fixed
>>>>>>fee - $5/month with netfirms.
>>>>>
>>>>>I keep seeing an old website, I guess free, that has not been shut off
> since
>>>>> the owner died
>>>>>on netfirms.
>>>>>
>>>>>Well last I looked I have at least 300GB storage on my Ipower website.
>>>>>If you pay on a 2 year basis, its about $6 mo.
>>>>>
>>>>>What does Comcast give you, I have not figured that out because I have not
>>>>> investigated.
>>>>>Its rare to see web pages on Comcast webspace. I know they took away
> USENET.
>>>>>Its free. I see 1 GB from some source, but I have not been able to do
>>> anything
>>>>>yeat after enabling Comcast webspace.
>>>>>
>>>>>I mostly use ACDSee to generate thumnailed picture viewing.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>If you use your own site, you can make thumails any size and pictures any
>>> size.
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>Most all web providers provide free web space. I took a few moments and
>>>set up my FREE Comcast space.
>>>
>>>Here is what I set up.
>>>
>>>https://home.comcast.net/~zekor/home/page_01.htm
>>>
>>
>>Alternately, my new home page.......
>>
>>https://home.comcast.net/~zekor/home/
>
>
>It also works without the s https
>
>http://home.comcast.net/~zekor/home/

And I now added my pics to my new web page.....

https://home.comcast.net/~zekor/home/

== 8 of 11 ==
Date: Fri, Feb 27 2009 9:43 am
From: zekfrivo@zekfrivolous.com (GregS)

In article <go98gr$j45$1@usenet01.srv.cis.pitt.edu>, zekfrivo@zekfrivolous.com (GregS) wrote:
>In article <go987d$j41$2@usenet01.srv.cis.pitt.edu>, zekfrivo@zekfrivolous.com
> (GregS) wrote:
>>In article <go9855$j41$1@usenet01.srv.cis.pitt.edu>, zekfrivo@zekfrivolous.com
>> (GregS) wrote:
>>>In article <go96ls$ins$1@usenet01.srv.cis.pitt.edu>,
> zekfrivo@zekfrivolous.com
>>> (GregS) wrote:
>>>>In article <go95ac$i77$2@usenet01.srv.cis.pitt.edu>,
>> zekfrivo@zekfrivolous.com
>>>> (GregS) wrote:
>>>>>In article <go9583$i77$1@usenet01.srv.cis.pitt.edu>,
>>> zekfrivo@zekfrivolous.com
>>>>> (GregS) wrote:
>>>>>>In article <70qigtF8opnpU24@mid.individual.net>, ray <ray@zianet.com>
>> wrote:
>>>>>>>On Thu, 26 Feb 2009 20:35:27 -0800, Twibil wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I understand that there are both free and pay sites, but I've yet to
>>>>>>>> find a breakdown anywhere that compares services offered, user
>>>>>>>> friendliness, bang for your buck (in the case of the pay sites),
>>>>>>>> etcetera.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> So with some trepidation, and no little antici..................pation,
>>>>>>>> I await your concensus.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> What sites do you personally use and recommend, and why?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> (Bear in mind that I can boot up a computer -and not a lot more.) ~Pete
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>I prefer my own personal web site where I can do what I want for a fixed
>>>>>>>fee - $5/month with netfirms.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>I keep seeing an old website, I guess free, that has not been shut off
>> since
>>>>>> the owner died
>>>>>>on netfirms.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Well last I looked I have at least 300GB storage on my Ipower website.
>>>>>>If you pay on a 2 year basis, its about $6 mo.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>What does Comcast give you, I have not figured that out because I have not
>>>>>> investigated.
>>>>>>Its rare to see web pages on Comcast webspace. I know they took away
>> USENET.
>>>>>>Its free. I see 1 GB from some source, but I have not been able to do
>>>> anything
>>>>>>yeat after enabling Comcast webspace.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>I mostly use ACDSee to generate thumnailed picture viewing.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>If you use your own site, you can make thumails any size and pictures any
>>>> size.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Most all web providers provide free web space. I took a few moments and
>>>>set up my FREE Comcast space.
>>>>
>>>>Here is what I set up.
>>>>
>>>>https://home.comcast.net/~zekor/home/page_01.htm
>>>>
>>>
>>>Alternately, my new home page.......
>>>
>>>https://home.comcast.net/~zekor/home/
>>
>>
>>It also works without the s https
>>
>>http://home.comcast.net/~zekor/home/
>
>
>And I now added my pics to my new web page.....
>
>https://home.comcast.net/~zekor/home/
>

Right now my Ipower site seems at least 10 times faster than Comcast.

Both

http://zekfrivolous.com/280z/page_01.htm

https://home.comcast.net/~zekor/home/

== 9 of 11 ==
Date: Fri, Feb 27 2009 10:25 am
From: ray

On Fri, 27 Feb 2009 17:43:34 +0000, GregS wrote:

> In article <go98gr$j45$1@usenet01.srv.cis.pitt.edu>,
> zekfrivo@zekfrivolous.com (GregS) wrote:
>>In article <go987d$j41$2@usenet01.srv.cis.pitt.edu>,
>>zekfrivo@zekfrivolous.com
>> (GregS) wrote:
>>>In article <go9855$j41$1@usenet01.srv.cis.pitt.edu>,
>>>zekfrivo@zekfrivolous.com
>>> (GregS) wrote:
>>>>In article <go96ls$ins$1@usenet01.srv.cis.pitt.edu>,
>> zekfrivo@zekfrivolous.com
>>>> (GregS) wrote:
>>>>>In article <go95ac$i77$2@usenet01.srv.cis.pitt.edu>,
>>> zekfrivo@zekfrivolous.com
>>>>> (GregS) wrote:
>>>>>>In article <go9583$i77$1@usenet01.srv.cis.pitt.edu>,
>>>> zekfrivo@zekfrivolous.com
>>>>>> (GregS) wrote:
>>>>>>>In article <70qigtF8opnpU24@mid.individual.net>, ray
>>>>>>><ray@zianet.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>On Thu, 26 Feb 2009 20:35:27 -0800, Twibil wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I understand that there are both free and pay sites, but I've
>>>>>>>>> yet to find a breakdown anywhere that compares services offered,
>>>>>>>>> user friendliness, bang for your buck (in the case of the pay
>>>>>>>>> sites), etcetera.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> So with some trepidation, and no little
>>>>>>>>> antici..................pation, I await your concensus.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> What sites do you personally use and recommend, and why?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> (Bear in mind that I can boot up a computer -and not a lot
>>>>>>>>> more.) ~Pete
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>I prefer my own personal web site where I can do what I want for a
>>>>>>>>fixed fee - $5/month with netfirms.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>I keep seeing an old website, I guess free, that has not been shut
>>>>>>>off
>>> since
>>>>>>> the owner died
>>>>>>>on netfirms.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Well last I looked I have at least 300GB storage on my Ipower
>>>>>>>website. If you pay on a 2 year basis, its about $6 mo.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>What does Comcast give you, I have not figured that out because I
>>>>>>>have not
>>>>>>> investigated.
>>>>>>>Its rare to see web pages on Comcast webspace. I know they took
>>>>>>>away
>>> USENET.
>>>>>>>Its free. I see 1 GB from some source, but I have not been able to
>>>>>>>do
>>>>> anything
>>>>>>>yeat after enabling Comcast webspace.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>I mostly use ACDSee to generate thumnailed picture viewing.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>If you use your own site, you can make thumails any size and
>>>>>>pictures any
>>>>> size.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>Most all web providers provide free web space. I took a few moments
>>>>>and set up my FREE Comcast space.
>>>>>
>>>>>Here is what I set up.
>>>>>
>>>>>https://home.comcast.net/~zekor/home/page_01.htm
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>Alternately, my new home page.......
>>>>
>>>>https://home.comcast.net/~zekor/home/
>>>
>>>
>>>It also works without the s https
>>>
>>>http://home.comcast.net/~zekor/home/
>>
>>
>>And I now added my pics to my new web page.....
>>
>>https://home.comcast.net/~zekor/home/
>>
>>
> Right now my Ipower site seems at least 10 times faster than Comcast.
>
> Both
>
> http://zekfrivolous.com/280z/page_01.htm
>
> https://home.comcast.net/~zekor/home/

You seem to talk to yourself a lot.

== 10 of 11 ==
Date: Fri, Feb 27 2009 10:56 am
From: Twibil

On Feb 27, 5:57 am, tony cooper <tony_cooper...@earthlink.net> wrote:

> So you failed the test. Here's a make-up question:

And here's one for you: In 250 words or less, explain exactly what
sort of ignorant twit thinks it's his job to assign homework to other
posters?

You have 30 seconds from............now.

== 11 of 11 ==
Date: Fri, Feb 27 2009 11:59 am
From: tony cooper

On Fri, 27 Feb 2009 10:56:28 -0800 (PST), Twibil
<nowayjose6@gmail.com> wrote:

>On Feb 27, 5:57 am, tony cooper <tony_cooper...@earthlink.net> wrote:
>
>> So you failed the test. Here's a make-up question:
>
>And here's one for you: In 250 words or less, explain exactly what
>sort of ignorant twit thinks it's his job to assign homework to other
>posters?
>
>You have 30 seconds from............now.

Is that an assignment?

--
Tony Cooper - Orlando, Florida

==============================================================================
TOPIC: And on and on it goes...
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.photo.digital/t/690e5c6701256988?hl=en
==============================================================================

== 1 of 3 ==
Date: Fri, Feb 27 2009 8:28 am
From: Dave Cohen

Bob G wrote:
> A terrorist worth his salt would carry a sub-minature camera and take
> all the pictures he wanted unnoticed and with the greatest of ease.
>
> We all remember the legendary Minoxes but I'm sure today's technology
> has produced cameras a fraction of even their minute sizes and capable
> of much better resolution.

Bobby G, the guys that bombed the world trade center the first time were
caught because they returned to the truck rental place to claim their
deposit for the truck that I suppose they were claiming was stolen. Add
to that little piece of trivia those who actually believe they are going
to be sucked up to heaven where 69 virgins will await them (or perhaps
that should be a 69 year old virgin) when they blow themselves up.
Regardless, I find it hard to ascribe to your theory that we are dealing
with the brightest lights on the planet. (Note: I am aware that others
share equally ridiculous beliefs about being sucked up into heaven and
I'll leave it to the reader to figure out what I think of that bunch).
Dave Cohen

== 2 of 3 ==
Date: Fri, Feb 27 2009 9:50 am
From: C J Campbell

On 2009-02-26 10:26:07 -0800, "David Ruether" <d_ruether@thotmail.com> said:

>
> "RichA" <rander3127@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:a94f975c-d23b-4661-a6cc-2db557c8b1be@m24g2000vbp.googlegroups.com...
> PDN:
>
> http://tinyurl.com/c4jq2t
>
> Robert Taylor was arrested February 12 after taking this photograph of
> a 2 Train in The Bronx.
> Last week in New York City, a fan of trains was arrested for
> photographing a train. It might be funny if it didn't keep happening.
>
> Robert S. Taylor of Brooklyn was taking photos for fun last Thursday
> in a subway station. Police saw him and cited him for unauthorized
> photography, disorderly conduct/unreasonable voice and impeding
> traffic.
>
> The charge of unauthorized photography – a crime that doesn't exist –
> has already been dropped, Taylor says.
>
> [...]
>
> In 2004, the MTA proposed a ban on photography in the subway,
> justifying it as a way to protect the subway from terrorists. The
> proposal died after an outcry from photographers and the public.
>
> [...]
>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>
> While alone on a raised subway platform near NYC in the
> late '60's, I was struck by the sight of tall, closely-spaced grave
> stones in a nearby graveyard that resembled a view of a large
> city with many tall buildings. I got out my 35mm camera, put
> a 200mm lens on it, and while shooting a few frames, I heard
> footsteps approaching. Almost immediately, I was asked to
> stop taking pictures by a policeman who informed that doing
> what I was doing was illegal. Hmmm, perhaps it was my use
> of a compact tripod to help steady the camera what dunnit...;-)
> --DR

Carry a Photographer's Bust Card. Download it here:

http://www.krages.com/phoright.htm

--
Waddling Eagle
World Famous Flight Instructor

== 3 of 3 ==
Date: Fri, Feb 27 2009 10:21 am
From: "Bent Attorney Esq."

On Feb 27, 6:36 am, Get lost <rander3...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Feb 26, 9:21 am, "Daniel" <m...@privacy.net> wrote:
>
>
>
> > "RichA" <rander3...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>
> >news:a94f975c-d23b-4661-a6cc-2db557c8b1be@m24g2000vbp.googlegroups.com...
> > PDN:
>
> >http://tinyurl.com/c4jq2t
>
> > Not that I have ever had a problem, but with the recent publicity I've been
> > racking my brains to try and work out why the photography restriction is
> > being so heavily enforced under the terrorism regulations, when Google and
> > Geomapping seem to do what they want. The conclusion I have come to is that
> > there must be a reason for it, so just co-operate, after all it's only a
> > photo. For me, yeah ok, it would up*ss me off, but it's not the end of the
> > world.
>
> > The freedom fighters will get the hump with the above statement, but
> > remember it's only a photo. For those people, I would urge you to consider
> > that it's possible that they may know something that you don't? Who knows?
> > But I can guarantee you that you sure won't.
>
> Stupid sheep like you are the real problem.

That is so correct. This cat uses the term 'freedom fighters' in an
almost derogatory manner. He/she obviously enjoys his/her sheep pen.
I don't.

==============================================================================
TOPIC: Did the Canon boat sink?
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.photo.digital/t/b0dfb9b4ed431024?hl=en
==============================================================================

== 1 of 2 ==
Date: Fri, Feb 27 2009 8:39 am
From: "David J Taylor"

SMS wrote:
[]
>> And do you really think that the noise between ISO 1000 and ISO 1360
>> (i.e. between f/1.2 and f/1.4) is /that/ noticeable?
>
> Interesting that you're choosing ISO 1000 as a baseline.

I'm sure the same argument would apply between ISO 100 and ISO 136, except
that these are not the sort of ISOs one might need to use if an f/1.2 lens
was needed.

Interesting that you didn't answer my question.

David

== 2 of 2 ==
Date: Fri, Feb 27 2009 9:27 am
From: SMS

David J Taylor wrote:
> SMS wrote:
> []
>>> And do you really think that the noise between ISO 1000 and ISO 1360
>>> (i.e. between f/1.2 and f/1.4) is /that/ noticeable?
>>
>> Interesting that you're choosing ISO 1000 as a baseline.
>
> I'm sure the same argument would apply between ISO 100 and ISO 136,
> except that these are not the sort of ISOs one might need to use if an
> f/1.2 lens was needed.
>
> Interesting that you didn't answer my question.
>
> David

Interesting that you had to qualify your statement with "/that/" because
that really makes it a subjective call. Is it noticeable? Definitely. Is
it /that/ noticeable? Depends on the individual.

==============================================================================
TOPIC: Suggested name change for P&S's
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.photo.digital/t/3f27fbfb1f649c26?hl=en
==============================================================================

== 1 of 1 ==
Date: Fri, Feb 27 2009 9:31 am
From: "---------------"

That name is already taken, Rich. It is, in fact, yours.

"Rich" <none@nowhere.com> wrote in message
news:oaidnQQmVrVI9TvUnZ2dnUVZ_jyWnZ2d@giganews.com...
> PofS.

==============================================================================
TOPIC: How to take photos of martyrs?
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.photo.digital/t/adc17b011847ad8d?hl=en
==============================================================================

== 1 of 1 ==
Date: Fri, Feb 27 2009 10:04 am
From: George Kerby

On 2/27/09 8:29 AM, in article h5ufq4hm4invrgctfgnu78iqohagpedd1v@4ax.com,
"Geo" <hw9j-s5hw@dea.spamcon.org> wrote:

> Garbage troll.
No SHIT?

How'd you figure that out?

==============================================================================
TOPIC: Making DVD's
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.photo.digital/t/ec0467440c2ea7bb?hl=en
==============================================================================

== 1 of 1 ==
Date: Fri, Feb 27 2009 12:21 pm
From: Doug Jewell

Matt Ion wrote:
> boothmarcus@hotmail.com wrote:
>> Hi
>>
>> Which application is best for putting JPEG pictures onto DVD, Windowds
>> movie maker or Windows DVD maker.
>>
>> I have tried DVD maker but the finalised DVD will not play on some
>> older DVD players.
>
> What type of discs are you using? Most older players don't like DVD+R.
> And some simply don't like burned discs at all.
>
>> Will Windows movie maker convert the JPEG pics to a true DVD movie
>> that will play on any machine, like a movie you can rent for the
>> night, as these do play on any machine.
>
> I don't think Movie Maker can create DVDs - it will merely put a WMV
> file onto a data disc. That's WHY there's a separate "DVD Maker" program.
>
> As someone else noted, you should be able to simply place the JPEG files
> on a data disc (even a CD-R) and most players will be able to play them
> back in sequence (look for the "JPEG" logo on the front of the player).
Yeah, most DVD players from about the last 5 years (if not
longer) will play a CD filled with JPGs, however there are
often limitations on things like how many photos per folder,
how many folders deep the photos can go, and the size of the
JPGs.

Unfortunately these limitations are generally not well
documented in the user manual, so are pretty much determined
by trial and error.

Also, my last 3 DVD players (a samsung, pioneer, and some
chinese p.o.s.) would only play JPGs if they were on a CDR.
If they were on a DVD+/-R they wouldn't recognise them, as
they expected disks on a DVD disk to be in video format.
Likewise all 3 players would play a CDR of MP3 files, but
not a DVD of MP3s.

As to the OP's question about Windows Movie Maker, the
combination of Windows Movie Maker + Windows DVD Maker on
Vista will produce a DVD-Video format slideshow that is
playable on most DVD players. Unfortunately though, a lot of
older DVD players don't like DVD+R disks, some don't like
DVD-R disks, and some don't like recorded disks at all. Only
solution for this problem unfortunately is to put the DVD
player in landfill and replace it with a new unit.

==============================================================================

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "rec.photo.digital"
group.

To post to this group, visit http://groups.google.com/group/rec.photo.digital?hl=en

To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rec.photo.digital+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com

To change the way you get mail from this group, visit:
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.photo.digital/subscribe?hl=en

To report abuse, send email explaining the problem to abuse@googlegroups.com

==============================================================================
Google Groups: http://groups.google.com/?hl=en

[fnftwo] Graphic Pretty Purple Flowers

Actually combined this with another challenge.

Thanks For Looking.

A Good Credit Score is 700 or Above. See yours in just 2 easy steps!

HayalDunyamiz Uzakta Şehrin Işıkları.. Nişancı

Şehrin uzaktan ışıkları görünüyordu
Işıldayan alevleri vuruyordu gözlerimize
Yel yel süpürüyordu sırtını karanlığın/
Aydınlık bir pınar gibi akıyordu dalgalanan seslerinde yalnızlığın..

Kuşlar uçuyordu/sırtlarında rengini seçemediğim kanatları
Bir hoş rüzgâr esiyordu beyaz tüyleri arasından/
ufka doğru yel yel asırları geçiyorlardı
Ezan kokuları geliyordu ruhumuza/
Titreyen gölgeler gibi..uzakta ancak görebildiğimiz minareler arasından.

Gri bir hayat yükseliyordu o sessiz ve narin bacalarından
Mescitleri bekleyen evlerin,
Gittikçe ışığını yitiren,
kimsesiz görünen sarı alev gözlerinden.

Zaman yükseliyordu duman duman
Biliyorum ki gökyüzüne kıvrılan acı ve gri bir tondu uğurlanan.
Ağaç desenli seccadeler içerisinde cevval sesler saklıydı
Kendince içli dualar mırıldanıyordu dudaklar durmadan.

Dumanlar arasında savrulan
Tarifsiz beyaz ölümdü sanki
Mahzundu bulutları yırtan kıvrımları
Kalın bir duvardı öyküsü :
/ şehrin uzakta yalnızlığını
bir kemer gibi/ saran...ki kıştı zaman..

Delişmen bir gece gibi ayakta vakurdu seher
Şehrin görünmez içli hatırasına değerken sessizce elleri
Şiirler yağıyordu deliydi /şairlerin gizemli yüreğine
dizeler boyu elemli.dizeler boyu hasret dizeler boyu görkemli..

İnce bir nağmeydi uzaktan geçen tren sesleri
Gencecik kara benzeyen-
Düşerken doğaya henüz bembeyaz elleri
Dert olup ölüyordu sancılı ayaklarında
Taze bahar misali müjdeli..
Zikrin sancılarına garkolan gönülleri ..

Mor renkli zamanların şiirleriydi tüneyen
Kimselere diyemediğimiz içimizde coşan öfkemizdi
Böğrümüze vuran satırlardı/harf harf
Dizeler boyu kanıksadığımız /özlem duvarlarını yırtan
Kalabalık bir acıydı hep üzerimize gelen yalnızlığımız ..

Ne zaman uzaktan baksam:
Görsem bir sessiz şehrin ışıklarını
İçsem yudum yudum tüm devingenliğini griye çalan mavinin
Bir avuç günah sanarak hatırlarım,
Belki sana dönük belki senden ziyade
Kırarak kabuklarını rengini yitirmiş duygularımın..

Sana açılmış bir el gibi çalarım hep yüzüme
görmeden kimseler ağlarım,kıyılar boyu öksüz
gecenin seher yüzüne dökerek gözyaşlarımı
kendimi yalnızlığa saklarım..
..erir içimde bir garip olurum
Diyemem kimseye dertlerimi şiirden gayri..
kendimde kaybolurum..

İbrahim Zarifoğlu

NİSANCITURKiYE / İstanbul

http://groups.google.com/group/hayaldunyamiz/

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
Bizim "Hayaldunyamiz"
Mail gönderme adresimiz:hayaldunyamiz@googlegroups.com
Üye olma adresimiz:hayaldunyamiz-subscribe@googlegroups.com
Üyeliğinizi sonlandırma adresimiz:
hayaldunyamiz-unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

adobe.photoshop.macintosh - 26 new messages in 11 topics - digest

adobe.photoshop.macintosh
http://groups.google.com/group/adobe.photoshop.macintosh?hl=en

adobe.photoshop.macintosh@googlegroups.com

Today's topics:

==============================================================================
TOPIC: color question
http://groups.google.com/group/adobe.photoshop.macintosh/t/5e5581c2dcf8f906?hl=en
==============================================================================

== 1 of 10 ==
Date: Fri, Feb 27 2009 10:16 am
From: J_Maloney@adobeforums.com

Ann and the rest do feel sorry for you Steph. That's why they tried to help.

Post 34 is gibberish. Good luck with that.

And just for shits and giggles: how long has Chris with his unexplained authoritativeness (read: knowledge) been working in "the industry"?

I picked this up in 6 months. Get cracking, girl.

== 2 of 10 ==
Date: Fri, Feb 27 2009 10:21 am
From: g_ballard@adobeforums.com

> I made a file with sRGB and color off and filled it with 287. I did
the same thing for the next file but turned all color on to working. I
made a third file with color management on to working and a different
monitor file...Now that you all know...

Thanks for clear that up!

== 3 of 10 ==
Date: Fri, Feb 27 2009 10:22 am
From: J_Maloney@adobeforums.com

I misunderstood it perfectly. Seems very... trollish.

== 4 of 10 ==
Date: Fri, Feb 27 2009 10:26 am
From: "Tom Murray 1" <>

This is exactly why this place has such a negative reputation in so many
places.

I'm shocked! Shocked!

== 5 of 10 ==
Date: Fri, Feb 27 2009 10:32 am
From: Jim_Jordan@adobeforums.com

I want an apology from Ann and the rest.

We are sorry for trying to help you. You can be assured this will not happen again.

== 6 of 10 ==
Date: Fri, Feb 27 2009 10:36 am
From: Ann_Shelbourne@adobeforums.com

Who needs "Saturday Night Live" when they have "Friday Morning on the Forums"?!!

Hysterical! (In both senses!)

:) :)

== 7 of 10 ==
Date: Fri, Feb 27 2009 10:36 am
From: Buko

Sorry I missed all the fun till now.

I have 2 questions:

Are your monitors calibrated?

And are you blonde?

== 8 of 10 ==
Date: Fri, Feb 27 2009 10:42 am
From: Ramón_G_Castañeda@adobeforums.com

LOL @ #43 !

== 9 of 10 ==
Date: Fri, Feb 27 2009 10:52 am
From: Ramón_G_Castañeda@adobeforums.com

== 10 of 10 ==
Date: Fri, Feb 27 2009 10:50 am
From: Ann_Shelbourne@adobeforums.com

LOL @ the whole thread!

==============================================================================
TOPIC: Scale large image down and keep quality??
http://groups.google.com/group/adobe.photoshop.macintosh/t/86d9762ccaedcc48?hl=en
==============================================================================

== 1 of 3 ==
Date: Fri, Feb 27 2009 10:15 am
From: Ramón_G_Castañeda@adobeforums.com

Use Bicubic Sharper in a single step to downsample, Bicubic Smoother in a single step to upsample. Forget what you read.

[Doing it in increments multiplies the re-sampling artifacts.]

== 2 of 3 ==
Date: Fri, Feb 27 2009 10:53 am
From: Ann_Shelbourne@adobeforums.com

Do your Output Sharpening on the down-sized file.

== 3 of 3 ==
Date: Fri, Feb 27 2009 10:54 am
From: Ramón_G_Castañeda@adobeforums.com

Do your Output Sharpening on the down-sized file.

Right, but nevertheless, use Bicubic Sharper to downsample.

==============================================================================
TOPIC: New Adobe security bulletin -- all platforms
http://groups.google.com/group/adobe.photoshop.macintosh/t/c2eee593505594d0?hl=en
==============================================================================

== 1 of 2 ==
Date: Fri, Feb 27 2009 10:22 am
From: Jim_Jordan@adobeforums.com

Especially free ones

Also possibly some threat creators and certainly many of the folks who
make dire Mac threat warnings are actually involved in the business of
trying to sell a magic buy-this Mac-security panacea.

You acknowledge that an app is free but then you suspect commercial motives. Hmmm...

I'd love to know what 'in-the-wild' really means. Is there a ranch or sanctuary where viruses are kept safe from the public? Does it have a moat or just a cheap plank fence? That exploit list was not imagined. Only a few are 'proof of concepts' (there is, of course, some absurdity in protecting against the Classic viruses at the bottom of the list when the software only runs on 10.5 and Intel). Quite a few of the listed threats are keyloggers. Wouldn't you like to know if you had a keylogger on your system? Seeing that all it takes to gain administrative access to most Macs is a system DVD, a manager of multiple computers would likely be interested in some sort of protection or analysis tool.

== 2 of 2 ==
Date: Fri, Feb 27 2009 12:12 pm
From: Allen_Wicks@adobeforums.com

I'd love to know what 'in-the-wild' really means.

Agreed, the term is poorly defined. In my usage I meant instances where large numbers of random users are affected during their normal daily computer usage, such as the current 9 million Windows boxes estimated infected with the Conficker worm. As opposed for instance to in the lab or at a hack contest at a hackers conference.

a manager of multiple computers would likely be interested in some sort
of protection or analysis tool.

Of course we are interested in well proven tools. However the tools themselves are not risk-free, so security implementation is not simple. Tools can be unstable, vulnerable or even suspect.

You acknowledge that an app is free but then you suspect commercial motives.
Hmmm...

No. I am especially cautious as regards using free apps due to the probability of generally less stable less well tested code. As to commercial motives, I suspect virus/malware writers and perhaps some a/v firms as well.

==============================================================================
TOPIC: CS4 layer masks driving me nuts!
http://groups.google.com/group/adobe.photoshop.macintosh/t/c042de49966c7f2c?hl=en
==============================================================================

== 1 of 1 ==
Date: Fri, Feb 27 2009 10:35 am
From: rkny

I use a lot of adjustment layers and color fills. Previously, for as long as I can remember, upon creating a new adjustment layer or color fill, I could begin painting on the mask immediately after creating it. Furthermore, upon clicking on any layer with a mask, the mask would automatically become the "active" area.

Now with CS4, I find I have to click directly on a layer mask in order to paint on it EVERY time I create a masked layer or click on a different layer and click again on the masked layer.

Is there any way to tell Photoshop to automatically select a layer mask when working on a masked layer like it used to do? I'm clicking like 100x more than I used to.

Thanks.

rkny

==============================================================================
TOPIC: PS CS3 Web Gallery problem
http://groups.google.com/group/adobe.photoshop.macintosh/t/92592bd51de51b7d?hl=en
==============================================================================

== 1 of 3 ==
Date: Fri, Feb 27 2009 10:39 am
From: "Mark Weidman"

When I create a web gallery in PSCS3, the gallery does not include the fields I check off. For example, the Large Image in the Horizontal Simple format does not include the File Name or Description or Copyright, even though I have those fields checked off. This is a new problem, in that it was working fine until recently. I have restarted the Mac but the problem persists. Thanks for advise. Mark W.

== 2 of 3 ==
Date: Fri, Feb 27 2009 10:57 am
From: Ann_Shelbourne@adobeforums.com

That sounds as if the Template that you are using got changed or damaged in some way.

Try one of the other templates and see if that one works.

Also try trashing your Photoshop Prefs..

== 3 of 3 ==
Date: Fri, Feb 27 2009 11:17 am
From: "Mark Weidman"

Thanks Ann, I am having the same problem with other templates, but I just tried creating a gallery "from scratch", i.e. creating a new destination folder, and it finally worked OK. But, I will trash the PS Preferences and see if that helps.

==============================================================================
TOPIC: Any recommendation for online UK print shop with ICC paper/printer
profiles
http://groups.google.com/group/adobe.photoshop.macintosh/t/2eef59d81894b4ec?hl=en
==============================================================================

== 1 of 1 ==
Date: Fri, Feb 27 2009 10:47 am
From: Ann_Shelbourne@adobeforums.com

Talk to them because I got the impression from their web site that they offered a service to make Custom Profiles — in addition to making high quality prints for customers.

As they seem pretty Profile-savvy, I suspect that they can provide you with Profiles for their stock on their printers; as well as with instructions for using their services.

I also noticed that they are prepared to provide a Proof print before doing the full Print Run.

You might also send a print which you have made to them with a "Please match this" note attached.

==============================================================================
TOPIC: Path is sometimes inverting in CS2
http://groups.google.com/group/adobe.photoshop.macintosh/t/25feae28ab4117b6?hl=en
==============================================================================

== 1 of 1 ==
Date: Fri, Feb 27 2009 10:56 am
From: Carole_S@adobeforums.com

I'm working with another designer who is silhouetting images for use in InDesign using paths and clipping path. He's doing them all exactly the same, however some import as an inverted image...the background shows and the person is knocked out.

I have checked the path in his image and although they are all identical, the ones that place inverted are also inverted on the icon for the path. (portion silhouetted is grey, background white) In the images that work properly the silhouette is white and the background is grey.

This doesn't make any sense because the path is around the part of the image that is supposed to be visible in BOTH situations.

Is there some setting I'm not aware of that could be causing this?

Thanks,
Carole

==============================================================================
TOPIC: How to make it so layer effects pulldown isn't pulled down by default?
http://groups.google.com/group/adobe.photoshop.macintosh/t/945913f142177023?hl=en
==============================================================================

== 1 of 1 ==
Date: Fri, Feb 27 2009 11:04 am
From: GYG@adobeforums.com

Sorry for not mentioning what version of Photoshop i was using. It is CS3, and thanks Tom, that appears to be what I was looking for. I'm not sure how i missed it. Thanks again.

==============================================================================
TOPIC: Possible bug with zoom field in Application Bar
http://groups.google.com/group/adobe.photoshop.macintosh/t/7d9c69a62a2879d0?hl=en
==============================================================================

== 1 of 2 ==
Date: Fri, Feb 27 2009 11:24 am
From: v6v6v6@adobeforums.com

Portables, shmortables; laptops, shmaptops. We're talking real Macs here.

[EDIT: Really, if I'd known we were discussing MacBooks, I wouldn't even
had read the thread.]

Even if it applied to both desktops and notebooks? I didn't realize there was a pecking order amongst Mac owners. So how about the original topic which you so graciously thought to take way off-topic... Certianly you have an opinion on it?

== 2 of 2 ==
Date: Fri, Feb 27 2009 11:59 am
From: Ann_Shelbourne@adobeforums.com

v6:

Look in your Tool Bar and see which tool is active before typing in a zoom factor.

Actually, I never do that.

I just use Cmd Spacebar; or Cmd Option Spacebar; or Cmd+; or Cmd -; or Cmd Zero; or Cmd Option Zero or the the new OpenGL zooming — all of which work regardless of which Tool you are using.

==============================================================================
TOPIC: Redraw issues with CS4 and Leopard.
http://groups.google.com/group/adobe.photoshop.macintosh/t/f0905c73fa51493c?hl=en
==============================================================================

== 1 of 1 ==
Date: Fri, Feb 27 2009 11:42 am
From: Eric_i.e.@adobeforums.com

Chris that has to be just about the most unhelpful response that I keep seeing over and over in the forums. The fact is that for some reason CS4 doesn't work right in Spaces and nearly every other application (in my experience) does, including CS3. No matter whose fault that is Adobe is the one who looks like a fool when it happens and the onus is on them to get it working to avoiding looking so foolish/incompetent.

I'm sure you'll tell me "I've seen other applications with bugs in Spaces, even Apple products" and that may be but in my experience using Spaces with a ton of apps nothing even approaches the train wreck that happens with any CS4 app.

==============================================================================
TOPIC: 2009 Macs and Peripherals :: General Discussion :: Chapter III
http://groups.google.com/group/adobe.photoshop.macintosh/t/c2f0ebcc850b85d0?hl=en
==============================================================================

== 1 of 1 ==
Date: Fri, Feb 27 2009 12:15 pm
From: T._Schmidt@adobeforums.com

I'm going to buy a Mac Pro. Which graphic card is ideal for PsCS4? I also want to do some video editing and 3DSMax on Windows XP but mostly PsCS4 in Leopard. As I was just told there are four possible choices.

Thanks!

==============================================================================

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "adobe.photoshop.macintosh"
group.

To post to this group, visit http://groups.google.com/group/adobe.photoshop.macintosh?hl=en

To unsubscribe from this group, send email to adobe.photoshop.macintosh+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com

To change the way you get mail from this group, visit:
http://groups.google.com/group/adobe.photoshop.macintosh/subscribe?hl=en

To report abuse, send email explaining the problem to abuse@googlegroups.com

==============================================================================
Google Groups: http://groups.google.com/?hl=en

Template by - Abdul Munir | Daya Earth Blogger Template

Photoshop How To Use

Categories

Blog Archive

About Me

Friday, February 27, 2009

[ellenspsp_sharing] Clover's Daydream. Masks and Kit - by Sabre

[ellenspsp_sharing] FBRTubz_as blue as_sinanTR, S&S

RE: [photoshop-beginners] update help

[PSP-Snags] BONNE ET DOUCE NUIT GROS BISOUSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS

rec.photo.digital - 25 new messages in 9 topics - digest

[fnftwo] Graphic Pretty Purple Flowers

HayalDunyamiz Uzakta Şehrin Işıkları.. Nişancı

adobe.photoshop.macintosh - 26 new messages in 11 topics - digest

Live Traffic

Categories

Blog Archive

About Me

Friday, February 27, 2009

Search

Live Traffic