|
| |
|
Ma Joly Meli© 2008 |
En tu recuerdo...
Como no tenerte en mi …, ¡ estas en mi!
eres la bocanada de aire que mis labios rozas
el eterno pensamiento, colorido y anhelante,
el mundo perfecto que mantiene vivo mi recuerdo …
Duelen tus palabras…cuando no me sientes
No percibes mi calor , mi sed de madrugada
Las ansias de tenerte en mis brazos amándote sin fin…
estas viva en recuerdos...,en el hoy que nos junta …
Ya eres parte de mi piel, del sabor miel...
de tardes lánguidas como el sol de mayo…
al que le ponemos calor y ardor con un solo beso…
Eres mía, tuyo soy y seré…
Bajo mi piel palpitas, encarnas mi cuerpo…
Despiertas mis eternos momentos de pasión…
¿como no sentir mis besos ?
o mis manos acariciando tus cabellos….
¿Irreal? sueño…fantasía….
En mi siempre estas….como el agua en el mar
En olas impetuosas de amor que vienen y van…
Mi ojos brillan con tu luz
Humedezco tus labios con gotas de amor
Del roció matinal, dulce sabor de amor…
viendo no una fantasía solo renace
en cada roce el amor….
Nunca dejas de ser recuerdo…
Si me alejo un instante… ¡ te extraño ¡
Eres pasado, presente y futuro…
Jamás olvidarte, eres el manantial donde bebo
Pasión, ternura y amor….
Marcelo Romano
Salta-Argentina
Na sua Lembrança...
Como não terlo em mim...está em mim!
você é a bochechada de ar que meus lábios roçam
o eterno pensamento, colorido e anelante,
o mundo ferfeito que mantem viva minha lembrança...
Doem suas palavras... quando não me sinte...
não percibe meu calor, minha sede de madrugada...
as ansias de ter você em meus braços amando-a sem fim...
está viva em lembranças e em no hoje que nos junta...
Já é parte da minha pele, do sabor de mel...
de tardes lánguidas como o sol de maio...
ao que pusemos-lhe calor e ardor com um só beijo...
minha é você, seu sou e serei...
Baixo minha pele lateja, encarna meu corpo...
despierta meus eternos momentos de paixão...
como não sentir meus beijos?
ou minhas mãos acariciando seus cabelos...
irreal?...sonho...fantasía...
em mim sempre está... como a água no mar
em ondas impetuosas de amor que vem e vão...
Meus olhos brilham com sua luz
humideço seus lábios com gotas de amor...
vendo não uma fantasia só renasce
em cada roze o amor...
nunca deixe de ser lembrança
se me afasto um instante...a estranho!
é passado, presente e futuro...
jamais a esquecerei, é o manantial onde bebo
Paixão, ternura e amor...
Marcelo Romano
Salta-Argentina
¡ gracias Anna Paes ! , obrigado Anna !
Sana Çıkar Tüm Yollarım
O narin eline el süremeden
Sürmeli gözlerini süzemeden
Altın saçlarına hiç değemeden
Gidiyorum sana çıkar yollarım
İçimde bir sızı yoktur ilacım
Ne senden vaz geçtim nede sevginden
Bu yüzden birtanem ayrılma benden
Bu şehrin yağmurları benim göz yaşım
Yarim elde ben dillerde kalmışım
Bir yol çizmişim buna kader yazmışım
Gidiyorum sana çıkar yollarım
İçimde bir sızı yoktur ilacım
Ne senden vaz geçtim nede sevginden
Bu yüzden birtanem ayrılma benden
İlker Özcan
Yokluğun yüreğimin karanlığına itilmiş şehri
Gözyaşın, yalnızlığımın bulanık nehri
Ateşten çığlıklar yükseliyor gökyüzüne
Gözyaşında bestelenmiş hıçkırıklar süzülüyor yüreğine
Yanardağları sıcak ellerin sanıyor üşüyen ellerim
Bir damla gözyaşına kanıyor kuruyan çöllerim
Hasretinin zehiri sürülüyor yavan ekmeğime
Bulutlardan acılar süzülüyor kanayan yüreğime
Yorgun dönüyor sana yolladığım elçiler
Soluyor günden güne dilimdeki sana dair tüm heceler
Yokluğun, sanki ölümün soğuk nefesi
Gözyaşın, isyanımın acıya tutsak edilmiş son adresi
Yalnızlıktan türemiş cümlelerle anıyorum adını
Her yudumda başka tadıyorum ayrılığın acısını
Her rüzgarla yüzüme savrulan kimsesizliğim
Her nefeste yeniden yıkıldığım sensizliğim
Nice ağıtlar yakıyorum her bir soluğumda
Gözyaşımla zincirleri eritiyorum yalnızlık koğuşunda
Uçurumların gölgesinde tutunacak bir dal ararım kendime
Ölmeden taze dallardan bir sal yaparım yüreğime
Yokluğuna yenilmiş asker gibi sevdamla göm beni
Gözyaşında ıslanmış hançer gibi sil beni.
adobe.photoshop.windows
http://groups.google.com/group/adobe.photoshop.windows?hl=en
adobe.photoshop.windows@googlegroups.com
Today's topics:
* Photoshop 7.0.1 - 8 messages, 3 authors
http://groups.google.com/group/adobe.photoshop.windows/t/33f5b95b06418421?hl=en
* wacom tablet + CS4 + No pressure sensitivity - 2 messages, 2 authors
http://groups.google.com/group/adobe.photoshop.windows/t/6c0eaa75555008f5?hl=en
* Pixel Bender Filters - 1 messages, 1 author
http://groups.google.com/group/adobe.photoshop.windows/t/a739b5d2b70a7efe?hl=en
* CS4 Extended - Lenticular Printing - 1 messages, 1 author
http://groups.google.com/group/adobe.photoshop.windows/t/c946ea9ead734866?hl=en
* Photoshop CS4 is a disaster - 2 messages, 2 authors
http://groups.google.com/group/adobe.photoshop.windows/t/e9e63cd766f5577f?hl=en
* Why are some filters not available if an image is 16 bit? - 3 messages, 2
authors
http://groups.google.com/group/adobe.photoshop.windows/t/46b69d0fb8c61227?hl=en
* Missing Fonts - 1 messages, 1 author
http://groups.google.com/group/adobe.photoshop.windows/t/71da9084571363cb?hl=en
* Photoshop CS4 impressions: many problems - 1 messages, 1 author
http://groups.google.com/group/adobe.photoshop.windows/t/09c363a4111fa878?hl=en
* Monitor Woes - 3 messages, 3 authors
http://groups.google.com/group/adobe.photoshop.windows/t/5185e12f9b27beb7?hl=en
* Problem with Arrange Documents - 1 messages, 1 author
http://groups.google.com/group/adobe.photoshop.windows/t/86464940a17b58a1?hl=en
* JPEG problem - 1 messages, 1 author
http://groups.google.com/group/adobe.photoshop.windows/t/99033e5d67e0b895?hl=en
* CS4 Extended uses wrong graphic card - 1 messages, 1 author
http://groups.google.com/group/adobe.photoshop.windows/t/41348884655086d8?hl=en
==============================================================================
TOPIC: Photoshop 7.0.1
http://groups.google.com/group/adobe.photoshop.windows/t/33f5b95b06418421?hl=en
==============================================================================
== 1 of 8 ==
Date: Tues, Nov 18 2008 6:25 am
From: Nicolas_COQ@adobeforums.com
Hello,
I have a serious issue with Adobe Photoshop 7.0.1 (I had it before updating to 7.0.1) :
When I'm working, every 10-20 minutes, Photoshop makes randomly the computer reboot ...
My computer is a bit old, but it was a time i didn't have any problem, and no other software or game makes my computer reboot (I tried to reinstall windows (currently XP SP3) but this didn't change anything).
Is there a way to fix that please ? I'm very bothered, because i always lose data ...
Thanks a lot in advance :)
== 2 of 8 ==
Date: Tues, Nov 18 2008 7:07 am
From: dave_milbut@adobeforums.com
usually rebooting is a sign of a hardware problem. check to see if it's really rebooting or throwing a blue screen and rebooting by going into my computer> properties> advanced> startup & recovery and uncheck "automatically restart". if it still reboots, you have something wrong hardware wise, usually ram, cpu, mobo related. if it goes to a blue screen error, you probably have a bad driver somewhere.
== 3 of 8 ==
Date: Tues, Nov 18 2008 7:37 am
From: Nicolas_COQ@adobeforums.com
Thanks for your reply.
I'm absolutely sure it doesn't show any BSOD, but i don't think it is due to an hardware problem, because it's the only software that makes the computer rebooting (even softwares and games that uses a lot of CPU, RAM or GPU does't makes it rebooting).
== 4 of 8 ==
Date: Tues, Nov 18 2008 7:51 am
From: "Phos±four dots"
FAQ on the subject by Photoshop engineer Chris Cox:
"Computer locks up, shuts down, or reboots while running Photoshop"
<http://www.adobeforums.com/webx/.ef47fb1/2>
== 5 of 8 ==
Date: Tues, Nov 18 2008 7:51 am
From: dave_milbut@adobeforums.com
because it's the only software that makes the computer rebooting
software doesn't make a modern operating system reboot. xp and vista are "process isolated" which means that when a process (application) goes down, it can't take the rest down with it. something photoshop is doing is exposing a hardware problem you have. other apps may not hit that problem, or hit it in the same way, but PS does.
my last upgrade was due to something similar where only ps made the system reboot. i've since reused that old ram and the cpu in my daughter's system, which leads me to believe there was a fault somewhere on the mobo (after about 4 years of use).
== 6 of 8 ==
Date: Tues, Nov 18 2008 8:21 am
From: Nicolas_COQ@adobeforums.com
Ok thanks you two for your help.
So the only solution for me is replacing RAM ? (i'm on a laptop)
== 7 of 8 ==
Date: Tues, Nov 18 2008 8:53 am
From: dave_milbut@adobeforums.com
that's not what i said... :)
== 8 of 8 ==
Date: Tues, Nov 18 2008 10:39 am
From: Nicolas_COQ@adobeforums.com
Lol, so what could be the solution please ?
==============================================================================
TOPIC: wacom tablet + CS4 + No pressure sensitivity
http://groups.google.com/group/adobe.photoshop.windows/t/6c0eaa75555008f5?hl=en
==============================================================================
== 1 of 2 ==
Date: Tues, Nov 18 2008 6:35 am
From: Aldemar_Hernández@adobeforums.com
I'm checking frequently the manufacturer's site for an update but Nothing yet. I don't know if this issue for Wacom users is Now Solved?
== 2 of 2 ==
Date: Tues, Nov 18 2008 9:30 am
From: Kent_C@adobeforums.com
The issue of 'losing tools' is _not solved_ with Wacom afaik. I still have the issue and have checked occasionally for newer Wacom drivers. I'll check again today.
I stilll had CS3 installed and there was some notes that might be part of the problem, but my attempt to uninstall CS3 failed 3 times.
==============================================================================
TOPIC: Pixel Bender Filters
http://groups.google.com/group/adobe.photoshop.windows/t/a739b5d2b70a7efe?hl=en
==============================================================================
== 1 of 1 ==
Date: Tues, Nov 18 2008 7:31 am
From: David_E_Crawford@adobeforums.com
I am interested in Pixel Blender.
However, it does not mention my Vista 64 bit system. The site reads XP SP2 and above but unless it reads Vista 64 bit I am not biting. Vista gets very cranky over having certified drivers.
==============================================================================
TOPIC: CS4 Extended - Lenticular Printing
http://groups.google.com/group/adobe.photoshop.windows/t/c946ea9ead734866?hl=en
==============================================================================
== 1 of 1 ==
Date: Tues, Nov 18 2008 7:54 am
From: Angela_Wu@adobeforums.com
I haven't seen the video yet but that will be great if Photoshop can handle lenticular by itself. Normally we use Photoshop to do the prep work and then use 3rd party software to handle the interlacing.
Flip is actually easier then 3D. You just need to interlace two pictures and then combine them. My guess is you can treat the two pictures as the assets for 3D and let CS4 do the interlacing for you if it can do that.
In case you need to have print them, I found this company does a great job, www.newcyberian.com. This is a dvd duplication company but they also do lenticular printing for the DVD slip covers.
==============================================================================
TOPIC: Photoshop CS4 is a disaster
http://groups.google.com/group/adobe.photoshop.windows/t/e9e63cd766f5577f?hl=en
==============================================================================
== 1 of 2 ==
Date: Tues, Nov 18 2008 8:06 am
From: malojo@adobeforums.com
CS4 a disaster? No, I don't think so. It has its problems for sure and its really hard to figure all out in betatests because of the million different computers out there.
See my configuration: <http://www.adobeforums.com/webx/.59b7022d/21> for example. I am really sure that this kind of configuration is not for the common standard user.
If have also some problems and I am very sure that this will be fixed if it is possible.
I'm also involed in producing software ( computer games ) and I know what I am talking about.
You can do a lot with betatests but not all. Even when now all the availible graphic cards are added.
I think CS4 is a huge step ahead and for me the first time buying the Extended Edition to get all the cool 3d tools.
Of course there are other programs which might be better for 3d editing such as Bodypaint but you know what...it would cost me a lot more.
Photoshop is the standard I need and when I can get an edition where I can paint my 3d models and get the flexibility to use all photoshop functions ( I don't thing Bodypaint has the same functionallity ) for some bucks ( Upgrade ) more and even can paint directly or use the textures which are also stored in the same psd that is amazing.
As my texture coordinates are usally correct when I start using PS in the texturing process I am a lot more flexible. No more searching for the right position or switching between the applications.
To sum it up. Yes there might be other programs which can do some tasks faster then PS but I think with the complete functionality PS is alone. And this kind of programs are designed for just that task. PS wants to do all.
So before blaming Adobe, give them some time and help them to fix upcoming issues. Bugsearching is always not very easy in software development.
Greethings from Germany,
Matthias
== 2 of 2 ==
Date: Tues, Nov 18 2008 9:46 am
From: Phil_Flowers@adobeforums.com
Why have adobe stripped out the The Picture Package functions, Bridge CS4 is no substitute and light room 2 don't cut it either.
As a busy photographic studio Not having picture package is a reason NOT to go to CS4. The GUI issues are a side show compared to the throwing away the best auto production on the market. Adobe talk about cutting of your own Nose to Spite....? unless I'm missing something, it's good night CS4 you aint got what Photographers need
==============================================================================
TOPIC: Why are some filters not available if an image is 16 bit?
http://groups.google.com/group/adobe.photoshop.windows/t/46b69d0fb8c61227?hl=en
==============================================================================
== 1 of 3 ==
Date: Tues, Nov 18 2008 9:23 am
From: polara@adobeforums.com
Can someone give me the technical and/or practical reasons as to why many of the Artistic filters are not available and are "grayed out" if an image is in 16 bit mode? This limitation has always puzzled me and is continued in CS4, so I am assuming that Adobe intends things to be this way. Can anyone explain why Photoshop works this way for 16 bit images? Also, do you really gain anything by staying in 16 bit or lose any quality converting to 8 bit?
== 2 of 3 ==
Date: Tues, Nov 18 2008 9:40 am
From: Mylenium@adobeforums.com
Can someone give me the technical and/or practical reasons as to why many
of the Artistic filters are not available and are "grayed out" if an image
is in 16 bit mode?
Because they are 8bit!, but I think you knew that already. ;-) In simple words: Most of these filters are a combination of threshold, edge detection, dilation and blur operations, with some Fractal Noise thrown in here and there and there is no benefit in having them run in 16bit, as in most cases they will completely overwrite the previous pixel values. It would be possible, though.
Also, do you really gain anything by staying in 16 bit or lose any quality
converting to 8 bit?
It all depends on what you do. Higher bit depths provide greater precision which is in particular relevant for photo touch-up and color corrections. Depending on the resolution of your image it also affects smoothness of gradation for gradients, blurs and so on, which is a simple math thing - when the distance spanned by a gradation is greater then the number of available pixel values, not every pixel can have a unique color any more. Therefore neighboring pixels may be assigned the same colors (banding) or interwoven with alternating pixel colors (dithering). Once that has happened, there is no way to restore the original smooth gradients, so you may wish to keep that in mind...
Mylenium
== 3 of 3 ==
Date: Tues, Nov 18 2008 10:02 am
From: polara@adobeforums.com
there and there is no benefit in having them run in 16bit, as in most
cases they will completely overwrite the previous pixel values. It would
be possible, though.
OK then, this partially explains it, but if it is possible to make these filters work in 16 bit, then why don't they? I always assume that if something in PS is a certain way, then that is how Adobe intends me to do it. But the "8 bit only" filters thing seems to be at odds with keeping images at their highest quality throughout the work flow.
==============================================================================
TOPIC: Missing Fonts
http://groups.google.com/group/adobe.photoshop.windows/t/71da9084571363cb?hl=en
==============================================================================
== 1 of 1 ==
Date: Tues, Nov 18 2008 9:43 am
From: "Vinod Balakrishnan"
Looks like you have some valid text in the Type layer and got stuck with one of those symbol fonts like Digbats/WebDings. You got stuck with these fonts since you have the "Missing Font Protection" checked in the Type preference panel. If you turn off the "Missing Glyph Protection" in the Type preference, the problem will go away.
-Vinod
Photoshop Engineer
==============================================================================
TOPIC: Photoshop CS4 impressions: many problems
http://groups.google.com/group/adobe.photoshop.windows/t/09c363a4111fa878?hl=en
==============================================================================
== 1 of 1 ==
Date: Tues, Nov 18 2008 9:44 am
From: Oliver_H_Sparrow@adobeforums.com
However, two hour later, CS4 crashed, spent 30 senconds communicating with Microsoft and lost an hour's work. An error message pointed to incompatible drivers, and that it had disabled GPU drivers. I have no idea what that means, but it reinforces the sense that this is a beta product released far too soon.
==============================================================================
TOPIC: Monitor Woes
http://groups.google.com/group/adobe.photoshop.windows/t/5185e12f9b27beb7?hl=en
==============================================================================
== 1 of 3 ==
Date: Tues, Nov 18 2008 9:58 am
From: Karla_Kraus@adobeforums.com
I have a 146 gig hard drive with 3 gigs of ram. I�m currently using PS10 as part of CS3 to finish a job and will then be loading CS4 with the new Photoshop, which I have. I tried Vista Ultimate and after nearly cracking up, went back to XP Pro SP3. I had a Nec Multisynch CRT and decided to go for a new LCD monitor�a Lacie 320, which I�m most unhappy with.
The problem is screen resolution. According to the Lacie specs, monitors should be set at 1600 x 1200. At that resolution, Photoshop as well as the rest of the CS, and the visuals that I create in PS, are all minuscule, and my three websites look stupid. I called Lacie tech support, and they said that I could go down to 1400 x 1050 but no further without distortion.
There are three problems: 1) Even with adjustments in XP, I still have to keep my nose to the screen at 1400 x 1050 to see PS menus, read PS help etc., and would like the resolution to be at 1024 x 768; 2) indeed, 48+ % of computer users have monitors set at 1024 x 768 or lower and will have the pleasure of seeing what I cannot see and would like to see; 3) 38 % of computer users have monitors set at 1920 x 1200 and will see my work as postage stamps, I think
Qs:
1) Should I go for another LCD monitor that will give me an undistorted 1024 x 768, if such a thing exists?
2) Any other solution invited.
== 2 of 3 ==
Date: Tues, Nov 18 2008 10:12 am
From: Bob Levine
LCDs MUST be run at their native resolution especially for work as
critical as Photoshop.
My advice...get yourself to the eye doctor.
Bob
== 3 of 3 ==
Date: Tues, Nov 18 2008 10:24 am
From: Jim_Jordan@adobeforums.com
3) Test a monitor before buying so that it suits your eyes.
While I wasn't looking for a high end display for color critical work, I just found a perfectly usable piece of junk that has roughly the same resolution, roughly the same size, and probably made by the same child labor in China... but with a better response time and higher contrast ratio for about $150. That's a little cheaper than the $950 you paid.
The question about 'an undistorted 1024 x 768, if such a thing exists?' indicates you could do a bit more shopping. There are plenty of options out there.
==============================================================================
TOPIC: Problem with Arrange Documents
http://groups.google.com/group/adobe.photoshop.windows/t/86464940a17b58a1?hl=en
==============================================================================
== 1 of 1 ==
Date: Tues, Nov 18 2008 9:59 am
From: Mylenium@adobeforums.com
No. These issues occur on other systems as well. However, there is no clear way to reproduce this, so it never got resolved during testing. I've had this happen a number of times. In my cases it seems to depend on how long the program has been used without switching layouts and possibly whether e.g. the adjustment panel has been used multiple times during a session. but as I said - this is sporadic and seems arbitrary. I'd keep watching it and when you encounter a situation where it makes sense, write a note on the bug report form ( <http://www.adobe.com/go/wish> ).
Mylenium
==============================================================================
TOPIC: JPEG problem
http://groups.google.com/group/adobe.photoshop.windows/t/99033e5d67e0b895?hl=en
==============================================================================
== 1 of 1 ==
Date: Tues, Nov 18 2008 10:24 am
From: "Tom A Elliott"
Cant save as a jpeg due to program error.
I rest preferences still cant save as jpeg in CS2 V9
==============================================================================
TOPIC: CS4 Extended uses wrong graphic card
http://groups.google.com/group/adobe.photoshop.windows/t/41348884655086d8?hl=en
==============================================================================
== 1 of 1 ==
Date: Tues, Nov 18 2008 10:37 am
From: malojo@adobeforums.com
No additional ideas at all? :(
Regards,
Matthias
==============================================================================
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "adobe.photoshop.windows"
group.
To post to this group, visit http://groups.google.com/group/adobe.photoshop.windows?hl=en
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to adobe.photoshop.windows+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
To change the way you get mail from this group, visit:
http://groups.google.com/group/adobe.photoshop.windows/subscribe?hl=en
To report abuse, send email explaining the problem to abuse@googlegroups.com
==============================================================================
Google Groups: http://groups.google.com/?hl=en
 Boyut: 31,6 MB http://rapidshare.com/files/162649699/Yaris_Oyunlari_240x320_Java.rar
| ||
| |
BEGIN:VCARD
VERSION:2.1
N:AKONA;Sandy
FN:Sandy AKONA
EMAIL;PREF;INTERNET:sdavenp1@nycap.rr.com
REV:20081118T175501Z
END:VCARD
BEGIN:VCARD
VERSION:2.1
N:AKONA;Sandy
FN:Sandy AKONA
EMAIL;PREF;INTERNET:sdavenp1@nycap.rr.com
REV:20081118T175545Z
END:VCARD
| Size: | 124741 KB |
| ||||||
| Oops, I forgot to put an E at the end of the text! Oh well, it is going the way it is.... This was an easy tutorial, and I probably might have spelled this correctly if it was in English. I have no idea what legere means! LOL. Huggers, Bobbi | ||||||
|
I appreciatively request wisdom regarding a few questions on scanning (and PS cleanup of some of them). Especially on just how high a resolution scan I really need to do.
I have to scan about 25-40 images from several historical books. All are printed b&w, none are color. The scans will include the (historical) captions in elegant script writing. Some of the images are reproductions of woodcuts. The others are halftone reproductions of old paintings. (All are long out of copyright).
The woodcut scans don't require much in PS. Cropping, cleaning up in levels, and maybe a little sharpening. Same with the halftones, except that I'm not sure whether it's better to try to get good "levels" by adjusting the scan, or doing it later in PS.
The images will be used in a book, first in downloadable electronic form, probably PDF and Kindle. Then later the same book will be put out as a physical book.
I've done some test scans. My scanner is an Epson Stylus Photo RX620 flatbed. For "destination image type" I have a choice of 16-bit Grayscale, 8-bit Grayscale, and "B&W." So far I've used the B&W setting for the woodcuts, and it worked fine. As for the stuff that's half-toned, I don't know whether 8-bit is good enough, or whether I should do 16-bit Grayscale.
I also have questions about format of the resulting scan. I have a choice of Bitmap, JPG, multi-Tiff (whatever that is), PDF, or Tiff. I assume that a purist would want the scan in Tiff (or multi-Tiff?) because it's lossless and I think you can make a JPG or PDF as needed later. I dunno anything about Bitmap.
I expect that a professional will later take the text which we're writing, and put it together with the images, doing cleanup and formatting as needed.
I also have questions, significant question, about resolution. How much resolution do I REALLY need for the intended use of a downloadable book and eventually a physical book? My scanner gives me settings all the way up to 12,800 dpi! But even at 2,400 dpi, the scans which are typically 4" x 4" are enormous files, and my poor computer really chokes on them. For my purpose, what's the real minimum scan I need to use? Can I get away with 600 dpi?
So, the questions:
1. For the woodcuts, which output file type (Bitmap...Tiff? What?) to choose? And what dpi resolution?
2. For the already-half toned images, which output file type (Bitmap...Tiff? What?) to choose? And what dpi resolution?
3. Should I try to get a scan result that looks perfect, or figure on cleaning up levels and such in PS later?
And any other comments, advice, admonitions, would be greatly appreciated.
Thank you.
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
------------------------------------
------------------- Photoshop-Haven --------------------~-~>
BlogViewsByRoz.com<br>
http://www.BlogViewsByRoz.com<br>
---------------------------------------------------------------_->
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Photoshop-Haven/
<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional
<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Photoshop-Haven/join
(Yahoo! ID required)
<*> To change settings via email:
mailto:Photoshop-Haven-digest@yahoogroups.com
mailto:Photoshop-Haven-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Photoshop-Haven-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
I took some shots for a law firm - and I am so mad with myself that there is
a picture on the wall that i need to remove and i have tried to remove it by
using the patch tool - but it keeps patching a darker color than tha
wall.....any suggestions would be great.
thanks.
margie
--
Margie Strickland
434-989-0646
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
------------------------------------
------------------- Photoshop-Haven --------------------~-~>
BlogViewsByRoz.com<br>
http://www.BlogViewsByRoz.com<br>
---------------------------------------------------------------_->
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Photoshop-Haven/
<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional
<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Photoshop-Haven/join
(Yahoo! ID required)
<*> To change settings via email:
mailto:Photoshop-Haven-digest@yahoogroups.com
mailto:Photoshop-Haven-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Photoshop-Haven-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Vladimir
those are amazing - what were you shooting with? how many of them were
re-touched? thnaks for sharing.
margie
On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 4:48 PM, GOTVLAD <gotvlad@comcast.net> wrote:
> Hello Everybody!
> When you look at pictures you can click with the mouse to look at full size
> of your screen.
> I just uploaded some new photos of Rome that I want you to see:
> http://www.dropshots.com/gotvlad
> Thanks
> Vladimir.
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
--
Margie Strickland
434-989-0646
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
------------------------------------
------------------- Photoshop-Haven --------------------~-~>
BlogViewsByRoz.com<br>
http://www.BlogViewsByRoz.com<br>
---------------------------------------------------------------_->
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Photoshop-Haven/
<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional
<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Photoshop-Haven/join
(Yahoo! ID required)
<*> To change settings via email:
mailto:Photoshop-Haven-digest@yahoogroups.com
mailto:Photoshop-Haven-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Photoshop-Haven-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
BEGIN:VCARD
VERSION:2.1
N:;macartedevisite
FN:macartedevisite
EMAIL;PREF;INTERNET:macartedevisite
REV:20081118T172843Z
END:VCARD
