Photoshop How To Use: Mar 6, 2009

Friday, March 6, 2009

HayalDunyamiz Pink Floyd The Division Bell

Pink Floyd The Division Bell

Pink Floyd:
David Gilmour: guitars, vocals, bass, keyboards and programming
Nick Mason: drums and percussion
Richard Wright: keyboards and vocals

With...
Jon Carin: programming and additional keyboards
Guy Pratt: bass
Gary Wallis: Played and programmed percussion
Tim Renwick: guitars
Dick Parry: tenor saxophon
Bob Ezrin: keyboards and percussion

Dosyayı indireceğiniz adres:

http://rapidshare.com/files/188449980/Pink_Floyd_-_The_Division_Bell.zip | 57513 KB

--
Arsive gitmeniz icin linki tiklayin.
http://groups.google.com.tr/group/acikalan?hl=tr

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
Bizim "Hayaldunyamiz"
Mail gönderme adresimiz:hayaldunyamiz@googlegroups.com
Üye olma adresimiz:hayaldunyamiz-subscribe@googlegroups.com
Üyeliğinizi sonlandırma adresimiz:
hayaldunyamiz-unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

[PSP-Snags] Curly Brushes for PSP

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
PSP-Snags Google group: http://groups.google.com/group/PSP-Snags
Send to: psp-snags@googlegroups.com
Uunsubscribe: psp-snags-unsubscribe@googlegroups.com

http://groups.google.com/group/Cartoon-PSP * http://groups.google.com/group/Disney-Tubes * http://groups.google.com/group/PSP-Snags-Adult * http://I-Love-Tutorials.com/chat * http://I-Love-PSP.com * http://PSP.I-Love-Disney.com * http://I-Love-Cartoons.com * http://I-Love-Disney.com * http://KTimothy.com * http://Disney-Stationary.com * http://Disney-Kingdom.com * http://Disney-Clipart.com

This is a private email and is covered by TITLE 18, PART I, CHAPTER 47, Sec. 1030 and Internet Privacy Law. Sharing done, within this group, is for personal use only - NOT FOR PROFIT
NO COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT IS INTENDED.
Group owner is not responsible for the sends/opinions of its members
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

[PSP-Snags] Landseer the Arabian

[PSP-Snags] accent corners

[PSP-Snags] Gradients

--
My Blog:
http://jantcreations.blogspot.com/

JanTCreations
http://www.freewebs.com/jantcreations

[PSP-Snags] FIredog ss t/p

A Good Credit Score is 700 or Above. See yours in just 2 easy steps!

[PSP-Snags] laundrey dalmation ss t/p

A Good Credit Score is 700 or Above. See yours in just 2 easy steps!

[ellenspsp_sharing] S&S; Font - LD Stardust

adobe.photoshop.windows - 25 new messages in 15 topics - digest

adobe.photoshop.windows
http://groups.google.com/group/adobe.photoshop.windows?hl=en

adobe.photoshop.windows@googlegroups.com

Today's topics:

==============================================================================
TOPIC: Eraser and Clone Stamp issues
http://groups.google.com/group/adobe.photoshop.windows/t/2aaaaf1998d95edd?hl=en
==============================================================================

== 1 of 5 ==
Date: Fri, Mar 6 2009 10:42 am
From: Susan_Sherman@adobeforums.com

I do, a Wacom Tablet. But I didn't experience this issue with CS2 (we skipped over CS3)? Is this a new "feature" of CS4?

== 2 of 5 ==
Date: Fri, Mar 6 2009 1:14 pm
From: BILL_HUNT@adobeforums.com

Susan,

Have you checked for an updated driver from Wacom? Around the release of new versions of PS, they usually have some new ones, that better utilize the features (the REAL ones) in PS.

Also, you should have complete access to your Wacom controls (Control Panel>Wacom) and I'd check to see that nothing has been changed, or reconfigured.

I do not have CS4, but there also might be tablet controls in Preferences?

Last, though you have checked your Brush settings, you might want to look at everything there very closely. I had a similar sounding issue when one aspect of Brush Dynamics was reset. Unfortunately, that was so very long ago, and I do not recall the exact setting that messed things up.

Good luck,

Hunt

== 3 of 5 ==
Date: Fri, Mar 6 2009 1:21 pm
From: Buko

how many layers?

are you cloning on a visible layer?

do you have a selection made? that you are trying to clone outside of?

== 4 of 5 ==
Date: Fri, Mar 6 2009 1:22 pm
From: Buko

are you sampling from a layer with something on it?

== 5 of 5 ==
Date: Fri, Mar 6 2009 2:47 pm
From: Chris_Cox@adobeforums.com

Also, make sure you didn't leave an unused pen sitting on the tablet (reporting zero pressure).

==============================================================================
TOPIC: Nvidia March 3rd drivers with PS CS4 fixes
http://groups.google.com/group/adobe.photoshop.windows/t/914f59ec66f16686?hl=en
==============================================================================

== 1 of 1 ==
Date: Fri, Mar 6 2009 10:47 am
From: Dennis_Hallinan@adobeforums.com

Thanks, David...got it.

Dennis Hallinan

==============================================================================
TOPIC: White is no longer!
http://groups.google.com/group/adobe.photoshop.windows/t/0a9b156eccc24d1e?hl=en
==============================================================================

== 1 of 1 ==
Date: Fri, Mar 6 2009 10:48 am
From: Susan_Sherman@adobeforums.com

Well, I believe I solved the issue. I downloaded updated drivers for the monitor, which seems to have corrected the problem.

My PS Color Settings are set to - RGB: Adobe RGB (1998); CMYK: U.S. Web Coated (SWOP) v2; Gray: Dot Gain 20%; and Spot: Dot Gain 20% and that my color management policies were set to - RGB: Convert to Working RGB; CMYK: Preserve Embedded Profiles; Gray: Preserve Embedded Profiles.

So my last question is, if all appears to be fine to my eye, are there any of the above settings you recommend that I change?

==============================================================================
TOPIC: Adding a layer mask using an existing layer
http://groups.google.com/group/adobe.photoshop.windows/t/6a76359da46cf9fc?hl=en
==============================================================================

== 1 of 3 ==
Date: Fri, Mar 6 2009 10:48 am
From: KatWoman@adobeforums.com

on the B&W layer
make a selection of the black or white areas (select color range)
then hit the mask icon at bottom of layer palette
you might want to inverse the selection first depending what you wanted to
mask off

== 2 of 3 ==
Date: Fri, Mar 6 2009 1:18 pm
From: BILL_HUNT@adobeforums.com

Though probably an extra click, or two, you can create your Selection, as KatWoman suggests, then choose Selection>Save Selection and choose Layer Mask. This has the added advantage of allowing you to easily Invert.

As I use this method most often (old habits), I often forget about the icon, that Dave mentioned.

Hunt

== 3 of 3 ==
Date: Fri, Mar 6 2009 1:27 pm
From: dave_milbut@adobeforums.com

there are at least 3 ways to do anything in photoshop! :)

==============================================================================
TOPIC: Photoshop for Illustrators
http://groups.google.com/group/adobe.photoshop.windows/t/9195ff3f54eec78d?hl=en
==============================================================================

== 1 of 1 ==
Date: Fri, Mar 6 2009 10:58 am
From: Alex_Dukal@adobeforums.com

So ... I'm thinking a lot if my next pack of brushes will be as "free" as the others in my blog or if I will charge some price for a Collection of Resources, not sure yet, but brushes are allways the same: a shape and a couple of settings, that combination could be magic or ugly.

==============================================================================
TOPIC: A problem caused this program to stop interacting with Windows
http://groups.google.com/group/adobe.photoshop.windows/t/80d19d64cc5afcf3?hl=en
==============================================================================

== 1 of 2 ==
Date: Fri, Mar 6 2009 11:00 am
From: myphotoshop@adobeforums.com

I try to run Photoshop.exe, but it doesn't respond. I get this error message. How to fix it? I have no idea where is a problem? I had no problems with it earlier.

ERROR MESSAGE:

Description:
A problem caused this program to stop interacting with Windows.

Problem signature:
Problem Event Name: AppHangB1
Application Name: Photoshop.exe
Application Version: 8.0.0.0
Application Timestamp: 3fce5708
Hang Signature: 1875
Hang Type: 0
OS Version: 6.0.6001.2.1.0.256.1
Locale ID: 1063
Additional Hang Signature 1: 3732c99c21cdca196fbfee3cc7094b85
Additional Hang Signature 2: 848c
Additional Hang Signature 3: 5c7261f725b6a443e8327138a3fe0208
Additional Hang Signature 4: 1875
Additional Hang Signature 5: 3732c99c21cdca196fbfee3cc7094b85
Additional Hang Signature 6: 848c
Additional Hang Signature 7: 5c7261f725b6a443e8327138a3fe0208

Read our privacy statement:
<http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?linkid=50163&clcid=0x0409>

== 2 of 2 ==
Date: Fri, Mar 6 2009 11:33 am
From: "semoi"

These "hang" messages occur with many programs, and I believe even drivers,
not just Photoshop.
Like many things Microsoft they are not well documented and there are no
easy solutions. Try searching the Microsoft Knowlessthannothing Base and you
will see. Googling gets the same lack of answers.
I presume some running process is blocking a program from accessing the
memory it needs to operate but the potential causes for that are endless.
First see is you have a system restore point prior to when the problem
started and go back there to see if it solves the problem. Unfortunately
System Restore is a great idea but something of a crap shoot about whether
it will work or if there will be the system restore point you need when you
need it.
Right click on the photoshop executable and click on run as administrator
(in Vista)--east to try but not likely to work.
You can deactivate, uninstall, reboot and reinstall Photoshop but this often
does not solve the problem if it was not caused by corruption of your
Photoshop program files, which it probably was not.
Uninstall your current video drivers, reboot and reinstall the latest
updated drivers: it is astounding how many problems this cures in windows.
Turn of all un-necessary background programs, including antivirus programs
(unplug the network cable if you are paranoid) and see if that solves the
problem.
Scan for malware.
I presume you have contacted Adobe support: they are not as good as they
used to be, who is, but they probably don't have an answer for this one
anyway.

==============================================================================
TOPIC: CS4 bug: brush cursor display is incomplete
http://groups.google.com/group/adobe.photoshop.windows/t/0f0a423a3ebbdc20?hl=en
==============================================================================

== 1 of 1 ==
Date: Fri, Mar 6 2009 11:18 am
From: Mark_Clarkson@adobeforums.com

The very newest drivers *do* fix the broken cursor problem on my second screen (WinXP Pro X64).

==============================================================================
TOPIC: Photoshop CS4 ACE exam
http://groups.google.com/group/adobe.photoshop.windows/t/eab2013ef26d45c9?hl=en
==============================================================================

== 1 of 1 ==
Date: Fri, Mar 6 2009 11:21 am
From: Luiz_Maklouf@adobeforums.com

The Adobe Photoshop CS4 ACE exam is available for scheduling at the Pearson Vue website since last tuesday.
I'm waiting for the preparation guide. How long it takes for Adobe to release a prep guide since the exam is out?

==============================================================================
TOPIC: Best way to remove noise and artifact - CS3
http://groups.google.com/group/adobe.photoshop.windows/t/686caee244cd6484?hl=en
==============================================================================

== 1 of 1 ==
Date: Fri, Mar 6 2009 12:14 pm
From: Dennis_S@adobeforums.com

I see two particular things in your pic that could be considered "artifacts":

- You have several sensor dust spots that show up in the sky. These should be cloned or healed out.
- You have pretty high edge sharpening applied to this image. What sharpening setting are you using in DPP? You need to be careful with DPP sharpening because it can be deceiving. Even a low amount of sharpening in DPP is the equivalent of fairly high USM sharpening in Photoshop. The difference is that DPP uses a threshold that applies the sharpening only to edges.

Regarding noise, I don't see much if any. In fact, it looks to me that a fair amount of noise reduction, possibly in DPP, has been applied that is smearing the detail to some extent. Check the noise reduction settings you are using in DPP. For an ISO 100 image, you should be able to get away with almost zero noise reduction unless you are having to push the exposure.

Finally, and please take this as constructive criticism, the composition of the image leaves a little bit to be desired. My first reaction was "this would be a fantastic image if it wasn't for those trees and buildings". I mention this because that may be playing an indirect role in the rejection - they may feel that the minor defects are enough to disqualify a less-than-compelling image. If you have the pixels and it meets their submission guidelines, I would suggest cropping the image to include only the mountains and the tops of the trees (without the buildings). That might help you along also.

Hope that helps.

==============================================================================
TOPIC: A PSD which do not want to open any more
http://groups.google.com/group/adobe.photoshop.windows/t/2ec9eee736b38a87?hl=en
==============================================================================

== 1 of 3 ==
Date: Fri, Mar 6 2009 12:16 pm
From: dave_milbut@adobeforums.com

if that's his address, i would. or you could wait a few days for him to pop in here, if he sees this thread. like i said, your file may be toast, but toby MIGHT be able to get something out of it for you...

== 2 of 3 ==
Date: Fri, Mar 6 2009 12:53 pm
From: Buko

do you think Toby wants his email published like this.

== 3 of 3 ==
Date: Fri, Mar 6 2009 1:28 pm
From: dave_milbut@adobeforums.com

maybe not. if bob can edit it to the usual at and dot format...

==============================================================================
TOPIC: Crop tool chooses reverse
http://groups.google.com/group/adobe.photoshop.windows/t/c2291c1f7be1a9d1?hl=en
==============================================================================

== 1 of 1 ==
Date: Fri, Mar 6 2009 12:26 pm
From: DeerRaven@adobeforums.com

I got it, never mind. I'm just working on an exercise and wasn't satisfied that it didn't look like it does in the book. Thought I was doing something wrong.

Thanks, guys. Have a good weekend.:-)

Martha

==============================================================================
TOPIC: Custom brushes slow down CS4
http://groups.google.com/group/adobe.photoshop.windows/t/6d8fe5c83463aa20?hl=en
==============================================================================

== 1 of 1 ==
Date: Fri, Mar 6 2009 1:17 pm
From: David_E_Crawford@adobeforums.com

Try the usual .net update, directx 9c, 2008 C++ update.

==============================================================================
TOPIC: no brush, after using pen
http://groups.google.com/group/adobe.photoshop.windows/t/888352d52a8a8270?hl=en
==============================================================================

== 1 of 1 ==
Date: Fri, Mar 6 2009 1:30 pm
From: BILL_HUNT@adobeforums.com

Howie,

Just as a test, choose the Path of your Shape in the Paths Palette. Choose Stroke Path and choose Brush. What happens?

Though Chris might be correct, I'm leaning towards Ed's explanation. Maybe also tell us a bit more about the Layer that you have active.

Good luck,

Hunt

==============================================================================
TOPIC: Cannot install CS4
http://groups.google.com/group/adobe.photoshop.windows/t/0410e46d2cf55e31?hl=en
==============================================================================

== 1 of 2 ==
Date: Fri, Mar 6 2009 2:30 pm
From: Vito_Smolej@adobeforums.com

I had the following run-up of problems on a vista (Siemens Fujitsu, 6 months old): except for one of the four none of the disks in the package could be read. I tried it on the system DVD reader/burner and on an external (Philips) DVD rdr/burner.

Looks pretty much the same as as top of the thread.

In an act of quiet desperation I stuck one of the DVD (Application 1) into my McMini - AND IT OPENED WITHOUT A HITCH.

Looks like there's DVD units and then again DVD units.

smo

== 2 of 2 ==
Date: Fri, Mar 6 2009 2:37 pm
From: Vito_Smolej@adobeforums.com

Pretty much the same symptoms as discussed all the ways from the top of the thread, I would say.

In an act of quiet desperation I stuck one of the DVD (Application 1) into my McMini - AND IT OPENED WITHOUT A HITCH.

Right now I am following the common-sense procedure of backing it all up on the network drive.

Moral: looks like there's DVD units and then again DVD units. Wonder at ADOBE's policies though. Could it be, that DVDs have been produced with some kind of green technology? This side of the tunnel there's not much green left, given the amount of (electrical and human) energy spent so far. Note I have yet to start to install.

Regards

smo

==============================================================================
TOPIC: Video Stills
http://groups.google.com/group/adobe.photoshop.windows/t/3f2515ef3fd4872c?hl=en
==============================================================================

== 1 of 1 ==
Date: Fri, Mar 6 2009 2:57 pm
From: Paul_W@adobeforums.com

How do you capture still frames from Video in Photoshop CS3 Extended? I've searched high and low for the correct menu combination but can't find it.

==============================================================================

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "adobe.photoshop.windows"
group.

To post to this group, visit http://groups.google.com/group/adobe.photoshop.windows?hl=en

To unsubscribe from this group, send email to adobe.photoshop.windows+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com

To change the way you get mail from this group, visit:
http://groups.google.com/group/adobe.photoshop.windows/subscribe?hl=en

To report abuse, send email explaining the problem to abuse@googlegroups.com

==============================================================================
Google Groups: http://groups.google.com/?hl=en

[ellenspsp_sharing] S&S: Tube Unzipped Pink Rosebud

[ellenspsp_sharing] Pretty amazing photos! Cat and Lynx, S&S

[fnftwo] MARTALIP - EDEN - ATTACHED

BEGIN:VCARD
VERSION:2.1
N:;hola
FN:hola
REV:20090306T223245Z
END:VCARD

Tube by Jet. No Copyright infringement intended. For Learning purposes only.
Please, don't change or remove images and credits when using my stationeries.
You can add your name on my tags, but don't add images or tubes.
©martalip

TUTORIAL LINK

[fnftwo] MARTALIP - EDEN

BEGIN:VCARD
VERSION:2.1
N:;hola
FN:hola
REV:20090306T223147Z
END:VCARD

your message goes here!

TUTORIAL LINK
Alice's Stationery

[ellenspsp_sharing] Sharing misc. fonts

HayalDunyamiz Özledim Seni/Murat Evgin/Cehennemgülü

BEGIN:VCARD
VERSION:2.1
N:;benimgrafiklerim
FN:benimgrafiklerim
EMAIL;PREF;INTERNET:hacergurcan@gmail.com
REV:20090306T221729Z
END:VCARD

Murat Evgin - Özledim Seni

Özledim gülüm özledim seni
El ele olsak eskisi gibi

Her yeni güne senle başlamak varken
Neden ayrı düşdük inanki hiç bilmem
Benim için öyledsine bir aşk değilki
Seninle yaşananlar ömrümde ilkti

Özledim gülüm özledim seni
El ele olsak eskisi gibi
Özledim gülüm özledim seni
El ele olsak eskisi gibi

Özledim gülüm özledim seni
El ele olsak eskisi gibi

Cehennemgülü

TURKIYE-Mardin
http://groups.google.com.tr/group/hayaldunyamiz/

adobe.photography - 25 new messages in 8 topics - digest

adobe.photography
http://groups.google.com/group/adobe.photography?hl=en

adobe.photography@googlegroups.com

Today's topics:

==============================================================================
TOPIC: Traveling is it Better to Rent or Transport?
http://groups.google.com/group/adobe.photography/t/24a93a312e90b6cf?hl=en
==============================================================================

== 1 of 3 ==
Date: Thurs, Mar 5 2009 11:42 pm
From: Ozpeter@adobeforums.com

Nice indeed. Shades of the Thames Barrier in those 'shells'.

== 2 of 3 ==
Date: Fri, Mar 6 2009 6:48 am
From: Wade_Zimmerman@adobeforums.com

Shades of the Thames Barrier in those 'shells'.

Actually one would probably find it hard to avoid that effect with this subject.

== 3 of 3 ==
Date: Fri, Mar 6 2009 9:44 am
From: Laurentiu_G_Todie@adobeforums.com

backlight

==============================================================================
TOPIC: Epson Stylus R1900 special buy
http://groups.google.com/group/adobe.photography/t/ec147a00fbb0bf1f?hl=en
==============================================================================

== 1 of 10 ==
Date: Fri, Mar 6 2009 1:01 am
From: ashleykaryl@adobeforums.com

I had a whole long message here which somehow got lost when I had problems logging in, so here is the short version!

The old printer packed up, so I did some research and bought a used R1800 rather than the new R1900. The R1900 sometimes gets mentioned with banding issues and I can't live with that in a printer. Then I did some more research and decided to get a CIS from inkjetfly which took about 45 minutes to install taking care and deliberately going slowly. I get great results with no problems and save roughly 90% in ink costs which is the single biggest cost on printers. I now get results which knock spots off anything I could achieve with my previous printers such as the Canon i9100, Epson 1290 or the Epson 2100. For anybody doing lots of printing I'd seriously consider getting a good CIS.

== 2 of 10 ==
Date: Fri, Mar 6 2009 1:08 am
From: ashleykaryl@adobeforums.com

For those who aren't aware CIS stands for continuous ink system

== 3 of 10 ==
Date: Fri, Mar 6 2009 1:36 am
From: Fred_Nirque@adobeforums.com

I've run CIS since 1999 (Conetech's Piezography B&W back then, on an Epson 1100), and then installed a colour CIS on my R2400 soon after I bought it about four years ago.

Sure it saved in ink costs (and in the day there was no real alternative to the Piezography system), but in both cases the ink blockages that increased in frequency and stubbornness with age became a hassle not worth the effort.

The 1100 eventually expired with a complete failure of the electronics, but the R1200 was rendered useless when the LLK head blocked up. No amount of cleaning with every forced cleaning method I can find has been able to free up the head, with at least 50% of the nozzles permanently blocked.

My Epson 7800 meanwhile, bought a few months after the R2400, has never had anything more than temporary blockages in one or two of the M, C, and LK heads, always cleared by a single clean and a few hours rest. Only genuine Epson inks have gone through this printer, and it has had at least as much if not more use than the R2400.

The Epson ink in the large cartridges in the wide format printer range is only marginally dearer than the CIS bulk inks for the smaller printers, so perhaps the best answer is to buy a larger format printer for an admittedly higher initial cost, but with similar running costs with genuine ink as a small printer has with CIS and non-genuine inks.

== 4 of 10 ==
Date: Fri, Mar 6 2009 1:43 am
From: ashleykaryl@adobeforums.com

You may well be right on that score and only time will tell how this works out in the long run but so far its been smooth sailing and I read an awful lot of reviews and spoke to several experts before I opted for this combination. Regarding the big beasts like the 7800 I just wouldn't have the space in my office to keep one.

== 5 of 10 ==
Date: Fri, Mar 6 2009 7:40 am
From: john_passaneau@adobeforums.com

On a good note, my rebate card for the R1900 came today. The printer is
working very well. The prints look great. The ink carts don't last all
that long and I'm really using up the black but much of what I do has a
pure black background. I really like the printer wish it had bigger ink
carts.

John Passaneau

== 6 of 10 ==
Date: Fri, Mar 6 2009 10:25 am
From: Allen_Wicks@adobeforums.com

The Epson ink in the large cartridges in the wide format printer range
is only marginally dearer than the CIS bulk inks for the smaller printers,
so perhaps the best answer is to buy a larger format printer for an admittedly
higher initial cost

Regarding the big beasts like the 7800 I just wouldn't have the space
in my office to keep one.

Space is also an issue for me, but the SP3800 provides a reasonable footprint at reasonable price and takes all kinds of sheet fed paper up to A2/17x22.

I did some research and bought a used R1800 rather than the new R1900...
Then I did some more research and decided to get a pigment ink CIS...
The prints with this set up knock spots off anything I could achieve with
my previous printers such as the Canon i9100, Epson 1290 or the Epson
2100.

I don't know about the i9100 but the 1290 and 2100 are legacy printers. Out-printing them is a given. Comparing to the R1900 or SP3800 would be the meaningful comparisons. In my Epson experience (1200, 1270, 1280, 2200, 3800) each new model has printed better than the last, the step from 12xx to 2200 being really huge.

...save roughly 90% in ink costs which is the single biggest cost on printers.

I would be interested in seeing the raw cost data over a long period of time, including time spent maintaining the CIS system vs. a printer like the SP3800. Also how many prints per day are involved. E.g. in my case a few years ago I literally print constantly but not as much today. My guess is that there is a daily volume break point where CIS becomes long term cost effective.

== 7 of 10 ==
Date: Fri, Mar 6 2009 11:02 am
From: ashleykaryl@adobeforums.com

I work from home and my office area is basically a converted bedroom which has all my computer stuff on one long desk but then I also have some big shelf wall units that are laden with paperwork, lighting equipment, camera gear and all the rest. Its fine but I have to stay organised and there really wouldn't be space for anything bigger than a large A3 printer here on the desk.

The i9100 produced fairly decent colours but it was plagued by micro banding and it was a dye ink printer so the prints never lasted any kind of reasonable period unless they were mounted behind glass. The old Epson 2100 I had printed images as flat as a pancake and this put me off the pigment printers for quite a while even though I really wanted the longer life prints. I remember the 2100 also seemed to suffer from all sorts of other problems like ink leakage and an inability to feed paper properly which eventually became really annoying since I was spending a small fortune in Epson inks. The new set up I have seems to combine the best of all worlds so far and its a much more refined machine in every way.

Yes I really need to measure the costs here over an extended period but after the cost of the initial CIS you'll generally find that 1 Epson cartridge costs roughly the same as one CIS colour refill but the CIS refill will contain 100ml of ink. As far as maintenance goes there has been none at all so far.

I do switch on the printer once every couple of days if its not being used just to stop the heads from blocking up but I had to do the same thing with the Epson or Canon cartridges and the R1800 always seems to print a perfect or near perfect nozzle check with no additional cleaning required. This particular system has auto resetting chips, so you never lose that big chunk of ink which normally occurs when you change a single cartridge and it goes through a big cleaning cycle for all the colours. Like everything I think the better CIS systems have improved a lot over the years.

== 8 of 10 ==
Date: Fri, Mar 6 2009 11:07 am
From: Nick_Decker@adobeforums.com

Space is also an issue for me, but the SP3800 provides a reasonable footprint
at reasonable price and takes all kinds of sheet fed paper up to A2/17x22.

Actually, you can print much longer than 22". The actual length limit is more like 37" (I don't have the computer that's hooked up to my 3800 fired up at the moment, so I'm not sure of the exact figure.) Of course, you won't likely find cut-sheets at that size, but you can certainly find 17" rolls of a variety of papers. Since the 3800 isn't really intended to be roll-fed, you'll need jury-rig a method of holding the tail-end of the paper before it goes into the printer, but that's not hard. I love my 3800.

== 9 of 10 ==
Date: Fri, Mar 6 2009 11:39 am
From: Allen_Wicks@adobeforums.com

Yeah, early on I considered cutting roll paper for the 3800 and decided it was too much trouble. However I should relook at that and do the math on costs.

And I too sure do like the printer.

== 10 of 10 ==
Date: Fri, Mar 6 2009 1:15 pm
From: Wade_Zimmerman@adobeforums.com

I actually just printed the image of Peter's portrait from Photoshop and that was very good but it was really excellent from ID CS4.

I sent Peter the one from Photoshop but will send him this one as well I think he will related much better to the image printed from ID though there really is only a small difference.

==============================================================================
TOPIC: to make my image into watermark
http://groups.google.com/group/adobe.photography/t/07acc1f70818710e?hl=en
==============================================================================

== 1 of 2 ==
Date: Fri, Mar 6 2009 4:43 am
From: cjmah@adobeforums.com

how to make my image into watermark

== 2 of 2 ==
Date: Fri, Mar 6 2009 6:55 am
From: Wade_Zimmerman@adobeforums.com

For what purpose how do you wish to apply the watermark?

==============================================================================
TOPIC: overlay images?
http://groups.google.com/group/adobe.photography/t/c4efe85928509289?hl=en
==============================================================================

== 1 of 4 ==
Date: Fri, Mar 6 2009 6:18 am
From: LRK@adobeforums.com

I like what you ended up doing Donald.

As as side note, it's been refreshing to see the camaraderie in this forum recently. And generous advice both here and in the Mac thread, and others. This is the kind of spirit that made these forums so special in the first place. So happy to see it returning.

== 2 of 4 ==
Date: Fri, Mar 6 2009 6:50 am
From: Wade_Zimmerman@adobeforums.com

So happy to see it returning.

I think I can fix this…let me think about the best and strongest way of going about this

== 3 of 4 ==
Date: Fri, Mar 6 2009 6:59 am
From: LRK@adobeforums.com

I think I can fix this…let me think about the best and strongest way of
going about this

:-)

== 4 of 4 ==
Date: Fri, Mar 6 2009 9:31 am
From: Donald_Reese@adobeforums.com

Thanks, i am always amazed how your perception can change when you see someone else put their spin on something. I definitely like my second attempt better, but i dont know if i could repeat it if i had too.

==============================================================================
TOPIC: Adobe Articles at Pro Photo Solutions page
http://groups.google.com/group/adobe.photography/t/23770ceb935024da?hl=en
==============================================================================

== 1 of 1 ==
Date: Fri, Mar 6 2009 6:35 am
From: PerfectMoney@adobeforums.com

I already use Adobe CS3 for editing,so far so good.but combining with that resources I certainly learn something to use my skill at CS at higher level

==============================================================================
TOPIC: How to compress Huge file output?
http://groups.google.com/group/adobe.photography/t/943e277767e44283?hl=en
==============================================================================

== 1 of 3 ==
Date: Fri, Mar 6 2009 6:40 am
From: PerfectMoney@adobeforums.com

I know I am a newbie here in digital printing,and my simple question is.I have build a good banner with adobe flash combine with photoshop CS,and my problem is at the result the file is to huge and need to compress,but I don't know how.any advice to compress it

== 2 of 3 ==
Date: Fri, Mar 6 2009 6:46 am
From: Wade_Zimmerman@adobeforums.com

I am not certain what you have done and where you should post this but the photography forum does not seem like the right place and your description of what you have doe is not specific enough

== 3 of 3 ==
Date: Fri, Mar 6 2009 1:10 pm
From: pfigen

How are you printing this banner, and what is the current image size of you file? Your file might be larger than in needs to be for how you're printing it. If it is, then sizing it down to a more appropriate size will shrink the file size.

What file format is the file in now? If it's a tiff, you can open the file and do a Save As and check the zip compression options in the save dialog. That will compress your file too.

Alternatively, you can save a zipped archive of the file, which may save space too.

==============================================================================
TOPIC: Where were you? (part four)
http://groups.google.com/group/adobe.photography/t/ab8c6a7a2987240a?hl=en
==============================================================================

== 1 of 1 ==
Date: Fri, Mar 6 2009 6:44 am
From: Wade_Zimmerman@adobeforums.com

Writers do! They hate to write but love to have written!

==============================================================================
TOPIC: Good Photograph Selfphone<any idea>
http://groups.google.com/group/adobe.photography/t/3c768d20911dec35?hl=en
==============================================================================

== 1 of 1 ==
Date: Fri, Mar 6 2009 6:55 am
From: PerfectMoney@adobeforums.com

I plan to go out and need to documents "good picture quality "with no heavy gadget from Canon ,do you have any idea,is that cybershot as sample"reliable for mobile use.or is there any self phone can do this job,I am sorry if I have a bad English.I look here recommendation ,tools to shoot that is light and reliable

Thanks to read

==============================================================================

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "adobe.photography"
group.

To post to this group, visit http://groups.google.com/group/adobe.photography?hl=en

To unsubscribe from this group, send email to adobe.photography+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com

To change the way you get mail from this group, visit:
http://groups.google.com/group/adobe.photography/subscribe?hl=en

To report abuse, send email explaining the problem to abuse@googlegroups.com

==============================================================================
Google Groups: http://groups.google.com/?hl=en

HayalDunyamiz Ozgurluk icimizde-Tarkan-Neslihan

Özgürlük İçimizde

Bir elimde düslerim
Digerinde ümitlerim
Aradım durdum senelerce
Yankılandı uzaklardan
Sesi geldi ufuklardan
Yine de rastlayamadım izine
Çaresiz
Rüzgara, yıldızlara sordum
"yorulma bosuna; aldanma
O zaten hep seninle." dediler
Ne yasaklar, ne tuzaklar
Yılmadım;ne yollar astım
Bulamadım rastlayamadım izine
Çaresiz
Rüzgâra, yıldızlara sordum
"yorulma boşuna;aldanma
O zaten hep seninle." dediler
Kuslara, yagmurlara sordum
"özgürlük içinde, kalbinde
Uzaklarda arama." dediler
Bir hazine ki; o en kıymetli
O en tatlı! ama kimde anahtarı
Nerde saklı