Photoshop How To Use: May 26, 2009

Tuesday, May 26, 2009

HayalDunyamiz TIMBA PARA UNA NOCHECITA ALEGRE VAMOS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

11/07

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
Bizim "Hayaldunyamiz"
Mail gönderme adresimiz:hayaldunyamiz@googlegroups.com
Üye olma adresimiz:hayaldunyamiz-subscribe@googlegroups.com
Üyeliğinizi sonlandırma adresimiz:
hayaldunyamiz-unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

HayalDunyamiz O MELHOR DO SAMBA * ALMIR GUINETO * MEL NA BOCA * MAXIMIZAR

BEGIN:VCARD
VERSION:2.1
N:Trujillo;Mary
FN:Mary Trujillo
EMAIL;PREF;INTERNET:cigana.lua@superig.com.br
REV:20090526T225943Z
END:VCARD

Almir Guineto
Mel na boca

Composição: David Corrêa

Oh, quanta mentira suportei
Neste teu cinismo de doçura
Pode parar
Com essa idéia de representação
Os bastidores se

fecharam pra desilusão
Pode parar
Com essa idéia de representação
Os bastidores se

fecharam pra desilusão
É mentira
É mentira
Cadê toda promessa

de me dar felicidade
Bota mel em minha boca
Me ama, depois deixa a saudade,

Será...Será que o amor é isso?
Se é feitiço vou jogar flores no mar
Um raio de luz
Do sol voltará a brilhar
Que se apagou e deixou noite em meu olhar
Meu olhar
Um raio de luz
Do sol voltará a brilhar
Que se apagou e deixou noite em meu olhar

É mentira
É mentira

Oh, quanta mentira suportei
Neste teu cinismo de doçura
Pode parar
Com essa idéia de representação
Os bastidores se

fecharam pra desilusão
Pode parar
Com essa idéia de representação
Os bastidores se

fecharam pra desilusão
É mentira
É mentira
Cadê toda promessa

de me dar felicidade
Bota mel em minha boca
Me ama, depois deixa a saudade,

Será...Será que o amor é isso?
Se é feitiço vou jogar flores no mar
Um raio de luz
Do sol voltará a brilhar
Que se apagou e deixou noite em meu olhar
Meu olhar
Um raio de luz
Do sol voltará a brilhar
Que se apagou e deixou noite em meu olhar

É mentira
É mentira

Atenção por favor!
Não são permitidas no grupo,
imagens eróticas, gifs
eróticas e nem poesias eróticas.

Venha fazer parte do grupo
"Doce Mistério", "A Paixão da Net".
O grupo mais alegre e gostoso da Net!
http://br.groups.yahoo.com/group/Doce_Misterio

Owners:
Roberta Viana (Sollua)
Mary Trujillo

Moderadores:
Alberto Peyrano
Adelia Mateus
Lúcia Trigueiro
Zilca Tricerri

Assessores Musicais:
Ógui L.Mauri
Alberto Peyrano

Lúcia Viana

Colaboradora de Eventos
Eunice Ap. Domingos "Nice"

Ao repassar... Não retire os créditos em hipótese alguma.
Trabalho exclusivo do Grupo "Doce Mistério"

Música também é cultura!

Art & formatação by Mary Trujillo

---

[fnftwo] Abysses

BEGIN:VCARD
VERSION:2.1
N:AKONA;Sandy
FN:Sandy AKONA
EMAIL;PREF;INTERNET:konajill2@frontiernet.net
REV:20090526T221104Z
END:VCARD

Hi,

This is the only thing I have done so far today in psp and more than likely may not get any others done as I am beat. Decided to shampoo carpets today and what a job that is although they were not that bad being that the carpet is a very light beige did not want any stains to get in it that would not come out later on and then spent time walking the dog and yakking with some of the other tenants outside which we seem to do a lot of now that it is nicer weather although it was cooler today and some light rain off and on.

Now will go and look at some of the mail on here and see what wonders will open up as always.

Sandy

http://www.fairymist.fr/tagabyssesanglais/tagabyssesanglais.htm

rec.photo.digital - 25 new messages in 10 topics - digest

rec.photo.digital
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.photo.digital?hl=en

rec.photo.digital@googlegroups.com

Today's topics:

==============================================================================
TOPIC: Phase One, bunch of damn fools?
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.photo.digital/t/f159cc458bc32c1d?hl=en
==============================================================================

== 1 of 2 ==
Date: Mon, May 25 2009 11:26 pm
From: DMac

Yuki wrote:
> On Mon, 25 May 2009 22:13:18 -0400, "Matt Clara" <none@myexpense.com> wrote:
>
>> I use PhaseOne's Capture One software, and have for several years. When
>> Capture One moved from version 3 to 4, there were many changes made. As in,
>> it's completely different. While I'm sure it's more powerful, it's also no
>> longer intuitive. How intuitive was it? I never once read a manual or
>> checked a helpfile with version 3. With version 4, I find myself consulting
>> it for even little things. BUT, that's not what I'm here to bitch about.
>> No, I'm not. I wanted to send a message to them, sharing my experience, and
>> I cannot, for the life of me, figure out how to simply send them an email.
>> There may be a way if I could remember my login info, or cared enough to dig
>> through back up discs to find it. Other than that, they want to send you to
>> their "partners," i.e., camera stores that sell their goods. Like they
>> care. All of this leave me a bit annoyed, and perplexed, as the, "we don't
>> give a shit what you have to say" treatment is what one might expect from a
>> really big corporation, like MS, not from a tiny niche player like PhaseOne.
>> That is all.
>
> Do this helps?
>
> http://www.phaseone.com/Content/ContactUs/AboutUs.aspx
>

That email address (info) never gets a reply (for me anyway) but thanks
for the effort.

== 2 of 2 ==
Date: Tues, May 26 2009 9:04 am
From: "Matt Clara"

"Yuki" <no-reply@nodomain.not> wrote in message
news:14rm159k7npr653irdk45lfltbamq919i0@4ax.com...
> On Mon, 25 May 2009 22:13:18 -0400, "Matt Clara" <none@myexpense.com>
> wrote:
>
>>I use PhaseOne's Capture One software, and have for several years. When
>>Capture One moved from version 3 to 4, there were many changes made. As
>>in,
>>it's completely different. While I'm sure it's more powerful, it's also
>>no
>>longer intuitive. How intuitive was it? I never once read a manual or
>>checked a helpfile with version 3. With version 4, I find myself
>>consulting
>>it for even little things. BUT, that's not what I'm here to bitch about.
>>No, I'm not. I wanted to send a message to them, sharing my experience,
>>and
>>I cannot, for the life of me, figure out how to simply send them an email.
>>There may be a way if I could remember my login info, or cared enough to
>>dig
>>through back up discs to find it. Other than that, they want to send you
>>to
>>their "partners," i.e., camera stores that sell their goods. Like they
>>care. All of this leave me a bit annoyed, and perplexed, as the, "we
>>don't
>>give a shit what you have to say" treatment is what one might expect from
>>a
>>really big corporation, like MS, not from a tiny niche player like
>>PhaseOne.
>>That is all.
>
> Do this helps?
>
> http://www.phaseone.com/Content/ContactUs/AboutUs.aspx
>
>

Thanks, Yuki. I guess clicking on Contact wasn't enough!

==============================================================================
TOPIC: Panasonic LZ-2 memory capacity
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.photo.digital/t/a623bd59781f29e3?hl=en
==============================================================================

== 1 of 7 ==
Date: Tues, May 26 2009 12:37 am
From: "David J Taylor"

isw wrote:
> The user manual says that 1GB is the maximum the camera can use, but
> I've seen places on line offering 2 and 4 GB SD cards for it.
>
> It may be that 1GB was just the largest thing available at the time
> the manual was written. Does anybody know for sure what the maximum
> card size is?
>
> Isaac

What age (design) is the camera, Isaac?

2GB would be the maximum for SD cards, if you want to go to 4GB you should
look for a statement that the camera will take SDHC cards, and that may be
missing from an older camera.

David

== 2 of 7 ==
Date: Tues, May 26 2009 12:51 am
From: Ofnuts

isw wrote:
> The user manual says that 1GB is the maximum the camera can use, but
> I've seen places on line offering 2 and 4 GB SD cards for it.
>
> It may be that 1GB was just the largest thing available at the time the
> manual was written. Does anybody know for sure what the maximum card
> size is?

2Gb card should work. 4Gb ones (of the plain SD variety, not the SDHC
ones) *may* work.
--
Bertrand

== 3 of 7 ==
Date: Tues, May 26 2009 6:35 am
From: "Stormin Mormon"

My Panasonic (LS-70) says it takes up to something, I'm
thinking 2 GB and then you have to use SDHC cards. I got a
couple SDHC in 4 and 8 GB, and they don't work. So, I got a
couple adaptors off Ebay and now I use the cards as flash
drives.

With storage cards being about ten bucks each, buy one or
two and try em out. Or, borrow a couple from a friend to
try.

With my camera plugged into my computer, I can use Windows
Explorer to view the pictures on my camera, rename them,
delete the ones I don't want. I can also defragment my
memory card using Disk Defragmenter, and then choosing the
camera drive.

I havn't had any need to, but it is possible to store
documents, and other files on my camera's memory card.

--
Christopher A. Young
Learn more about Jesus
www.lds.org
.

"isw" <isw@witzend.com> wrote in message
news:isw-FD53C4.21541525052009@[216.168.3.50]...
The user manual says that 1GB is the maximum the camera can
use, but
I've seen places on line offering 2 and 4 GB SD cards for
it.

It may be that 1GB was just the largest thing available at
the time the
manual was written. Does anybody know for sure what the
maximum card
size is?

Isaac

== 4 of 7 ==
Date: Tues, May 26 2009 8:00 am
From: ray

On Mon, 25 May 2009 21:54:15 -0700, isw wrote:

> The user manual says that 1GB is the maximum the camera can use, but
> I've seen places on line offering 2 and 4 GB SD cards for it.
>
> It may be that 1GB was just the largest thing available at the time the
> manual was written. Does anybody know for sure what the maximum card
> size is?
>
> Isaac

You'll probably not have any issues with larger cards, but can't say until
you try them. There is some good info on the wikipedia article about SD
cards. Make certain that they are not SDHC cards and you'll probably be
all right.

== 5 of 7 ==
Date: Tues, May 26 2009 10:10 am
From: isw

In article <a%MSl.34012$OO7.13908@text.news.virginmedia.com>,
"David J Taylor"
<david-taylor@blueyonder.not-this-part.nor-this.co.uk.invalid> wrote:

> isw wrote:
> > The user manual says that 1GB is the maximum the camera can use, but
> > I've seen places on line offering 2 and 4 GB SD cards for it.
> >
> > It may be that 1GB was just the largest thing available at the time
> > the manual was written. Does anybody know for sure what the maximum
> > card size is?
> >
> > Isaac
>
> What age (design) is the camera, Isaac?

Honestly, I don't know; I bought it used.

> 2GB would be the maximum for SD cards, if you want to go to 4GB you should
> look for a statement that the camera will take SDHC cards, and that may be
> missing from an older camera.

I'm pretty sure it won't handle SDHC cards; there's no mention of that
in the User Manual.

Isaac

== 6 of 7 ==
Date: Tues, May 26 2009 10:16 am
From: isw

In article <4a1b9f72$0$21815$426a74cc@news.free.fr>,
Ofnuts <o.f.n.u.t.s@la.poste.net> wrote:

> isw wrote:
> > The user manual says that 1GB is the maximum the camera can use, but
> > I've seen places on line offering 2 and 4 GB SD cards for it.
> >
> > It may be that 1GB was just the largest thing available at the time the
> > manual was written. Does anybody know for sure what the maximum card
> > size is?
>
> 2Gb card should work. 4Gb ones (of the plain SD variety, not the SDHC
> ones) *may* work.

I appreciate the info. Could you elaborate on why? I'm always interested
in knowing the reasons... (I know why SDHC won't work).

I once had a digital camera that used the old Compact Flash cards. The
User Manual cautioned that the camera software would scramble any card
with more than 32 Meg capacity; I just wondered if this camera might
have a similar "feature".

Isaac

== 7 of 7 ==
Date: Tues, May 26 2009 11:58 am
From: "David J Taylor"

isw wrote:
[]
> I appreciate the info. Could you elaborate on why? I'm always
> interested in knowing the reasons... (I know why SDHC won't work).
>
> I once had a digital camera that used the old Compact Flash cards. The
> User Manual cautioned that the camera software would scramble any card
> with more than 32 Meg capacity; I just wondered if this camera might
> have a similar "feature".
>
> Isaac

Take a look here:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Secure_Digital_card#Compatibility_issues_with_2_GB_and_larger_cards

Cheers,
David

==============================================================================
TOPIC: P&S Revenue predicted to fall by 24%, D-SLR revenue predicted to fall
by 12%
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.photo.digital/t/13c7f45bc1c23aa1?hl=en
==============================================================================

== 1 of 5 ==
Date: Tues, May 26 2009 12:59 am
From: Ron Hunter

SMS wrote:
> Ron Hunter wrote:
>
>> Well, people like that aren't worth much attention, which is what they
>> are after. I will just ignore him in the future.
>
> Filtering him works pretty well because despite the fact that he changes
> his identity constantly, there are some things in his headers, and even
> in the fake e-mail addresses he creates, that you can filter on.
>
> You need a better news reader than Thunderbird or Outlook, and you have
> to be willing to spend some time creating filters on unique attributes
> in his headers.
>
> One very good free Usnet news reader is 40tude Dialog, at
> "http://www.40tude.com/dialog/".
>
> I'm slowly migrating over from Thunderbird, copying my existing filters
> and adding new ones, but in reality you need less filters in 40tude
> Dialog because you can look at attributes other than just "from" or
> "subject" though fortunately, most posters you want to filter are not
> quite as obnoxious as our troll.

The filtering need not be perfect. I have no intention of switching
from Thunderbird. Better filtering is on the way, shortly. Such minor
irritations really aren't worth the trauma of switching newsreaders.

== 2 of 5 ==
Date: Tues, May 26 2009 6:51 am
From: SMS

Ron Hunter wrote:

> The filtering need not be perfect. I have no intention of switching
> from Thunderbird. Better filtering is on the way, shortly. Such minor
> irritations really aren't worth the trauma of switching newsreaders.

It's not just our troll, it's stuff like the recent rash of postings of
merchandise originating from "news.usenetmonster.com". Amazingly this
provider actually did recognize the problem eventually, and shut the
poster down, but it was really annoying while it lasted.

== 3 of 5 ==
Date: Tues, May 26 2009 9:38 am
From: Paul Furman

nospam wrote:
> In article <erednZN1O6xK-YbXnZ2dnVY3goidnZ2d@giganews.com>, David J.
> Littleboy <davidjl@gol.com> wrote:
>
>>> You mean that the refractive index of the glass is altered by the image
>>> stabilization mechanism? Do tell.
>> No. He means that by shifting one or more central elements in the lens, the
>> construction, and thus optical properties, of the lens change. Thus it's not
>> unreasonable to expect that the amount of CA will change also.
>
> it's possible, but it's insignificant and certainly something that
> would have been considered in the overall design.
>
>> Whether this is detectable or not is another question, of course.
>
> exactly. if it's not detectable, who cares.
>
>> Still, it's a good point that IS is another constraint, and implies worse
>> optical performance than one might otherwise get. Another reason in-camera
>> stabilization is a good idea.
>
> they both have advantages and disadvantages.

Both would tend to push at least one corner inward, improving one side,
making another worse. The troll just made this up though, it's a non-issue.

--
Paul Furman
www.edgehill.net
www.baynatives.com

all google groups messages filtered due to spam

== 4 of 5 ==
Date: Tues, May 26 2009 1:48 pm
From: Rob G

On 21 May, 19:18, SMS <scharf.ste...@geemail.com> wrote:
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
> Barclays Capital estimates that consumer-oriented point and shoot
> digital camera sales will shrink 24% in terms of revenue amid a global
> slump in demand. Casio and Olympus recently cut prices on point and
> shoot cameras, but analysts say that prices of point and shoot models
> have bottomed out in terms of the manufacturers being able to cut prices
> further, because margins are already close to zero. A shake out is
> imminent in the digital camera business, with other producers set to
> follow the lead of Konica-Minolta and abandon the business.
>
> Digital SLR revenue is predicted to shrink by 12%, as prices fall due to
> greater competition and the introduction of lower priced models. Digital
> SLR cameras used to be purchased mainly by hobbyists and professionals,
> but the addition of features such as "Live View" and video capability
> have boosted sales volumes in the mass market, according to analyst Tak
> Tomasako. "The main advantage of the digital SLR to the casual
> photographer is the lack of shutter lag, that annoying delay on point
> and shoot cameras between when the shutter release is pressed and the
> photograph is taken," said Tomasako.
>
> "The lack of live view and video recording capability also hurt demand
> for digital SLRs in the mass market," continued Tomasako. "These
> features were already present on point and shoot cameras, and consumers
> expected them on digital SLRs as well, even though hobbyists and
> professionals didn't care about those features. Now the digital SLR
> manufacturers have added these features and are penetrating into the
> mass market. For the manufacturer, there is the opportunity to sell not
> only the camera, but a variety of high margin lenses and accessories."
>
> Not all manufacturers will survive in the digital SLR business stressed
> Tomasako. "Canon and Nikon currently have over 80% market share between
> them, with Sony (who bought Konica-Minolta's digital SLR business) a
> distant third. Olympus and Pentax barely register at all and will find
> it difficult to continue. Olympus has teamed up with Panasonic to
> promote their 4:3 and micro 4:3 system with little success. Pentax has
> teamed up with Korea's Samsung to co-brand digital SLRs, also with
> little success."
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> What I don't get about this news item is that if D-SLRs are penetrating
> into the mass market, as they appear to be doing, won't the increase in
> sales more than make up for the lower ASP, _increasing_ revenue while
> decreasing margins?

I've read through most of the posts in this thread and am amazed at
the abuse that flows back and forth not only in this thread but
throughout this NG in general.

I'm not a troll as I will bring something of my observations on the
subject shortly, but I am a regular user of NG's and forums in the UK
and I've never come across such polarised opinion and poor quality
discussion in terms of argumentative emotion on the subjects raised.
You really all need to look at yourselves and wonder just who you are
and whom you are trying to convince that you are any wiser than anyone
else. You accuse posters of being trolls but is it hardly surprising
that you are being wound up when you all lay yourselves so open to
being seen as such pompous idiots.

I'm an amateur photographer - I'm old enough to remember as a child
using box brownies and developing my own 35mm b&w films. I enjoy
recording life as it goes past, but I'm not a pro-am unlike many here
make themselves out to be. Anyway I did a brief test today, totally
unrelated to this thread. I've a Canon 300D with it's native lens,
and I've a Panasonic FX01. My test ? I wanted to investigate
recording many family papers - I can either scan them or I can photo
them, so I tried the cameras this morning. What astonished me,
particularly in line with this thread, that in an identical shot, the
P & S was far superior in detail to the SLR. I had to Sharpen the SLR
shot to be able to read the text. which in the P & S was clear and
readable without significant zooming in.

If you regard the postings in favour of P & S cameras as trolls then
so be it, but my test with the equipment I have has been a bit of an
eye opener.

Rob

== 5 of 5 ==
Date: Tues, May 26 2009 2:46 pm
From: Savageduck

On 2009-05-26 13:48:46 -0700, Rob G <robkgraham@btinternet.com> said:

> On 21 May, 19:18, SMS <scharf.ste...@geemail.com> wrote:
> I've read through most of the posts in this thread and am amazed at
> the abuse that flows back and forth not only in this thread but
> throughout this NG in general.

Such is the nature of opinionated individuals, regardless of level of
knowledge in any particular subject.
>
> I'm not a troll as I will bring something of my observations on the
> subject shortly, but I am a regular user of NG's and forums in the UK
> and I've never come across such polarised opinion and poor quality
> discussion in terms of argumentative emotion on the subjects raised.
> You really all need to look at yourselves and wonder just who you are
> and whom you are trying to convince that you are any wiser than anyone
> else. You accuse posters of being trolls but is it hardly surprising
> that you are being wound up when you all lay yourselves so open to
> being seen as such pompous idiots.

There are individuals who deliberately provoke response in these groups
for the purpose of espousing an argument based in fantasy, and/or
ignorance.
Some of us react to these "trolls" in anger, as their efforts seem
designed to destroy the interaction and value of these NGs
Sometimes our reactions are reflexively reactionary, sometime a thread
degrades or develops into a discussion which has nothing to do with the
OP.
Sometimes we (and I include myself) are just plain wrong.
>
> I'm an amateur photographer - I'm old enough to remember as a child
> using box brownies and developing my own 35mm b&w films. I enjoy
> recording life as it goes past, but I'm not a pro-am unlike many here
> make themselves out to be.

It sounds as if you have a history similar to many here, myself
included. Many of us are just photographers, some have a need to
identify themselves as "Pros" and some actually are "Pros". Many come
from other fields and have different experiences which can from time to
time be enlightening, and from time to time provoke further argument.

> Anyway I did a brief test today, totally
> unrelated to this thread. I've a Canon 300D with it's native lens,

...and this "native" lens is what exactly?

> and I've a Panasonic FX01. My test ? I wanted to investigate
> recording many family papers - I can either scan them or I can photo
> them, so I tried the cameras this morning. What astonished me,
> particularly in line with this thread, that in an identical shot, the
> P & S was far superior in detail to the SLR. I had to Sharpen the SLR
> shot to be able to read the text. which in the P & S was clear and
> readable without significant zooming in.

This may be true in your given circumstances, however as I noted you
failed to tell us which lens you are using with your DSLR. There are
some lens choices (that is the beauty of the DSLR, choice, flexibility
& adaptability beyond the P&S capability,) which may serve your purpose
better.
>
> If you regard the postings in favour of P & S cameras as trolls then
> so be it, but my test with the equipment I have has been a bit of an
> eye opener.

None of us consider postings in favour of P&S cameras "trolls", however
once the posting develops into an irrational evangelizing effort based
in provocative ignorance, it can only be considered a troll.
A certain truly "trollish" individual, who has chosen to change his NG
identity constantly has provoked this P&S /DSLR polarization. Using his
personally developed arguments based on nothing, to provoke reaction.
This individual has yet to provide comparative evidence of his claims.

Many of us use both DSLR and P&S, they both have a purpose and both
can, and have produced great and awful images.
>
> Rob

--
Regards,
Savageduck

==============================================================================
TOPIC: www.niketrade08.cn ) BBC T-shirt cheap wholesaler (paypal payment
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.photo.digital/t/6d42cdd0d020868a?hl=en
==============================================================================

== 1 of 1 ==
Date: Tues, May 26 2009 2:19 am
From: lishirt4@163.com

We provide Abercrombie & Fitch,Lacoste,Ralph Lauren polo etc brand
cloth,like t-shirt,jacket,jeans,fleece,pants and so on), also provide
sports Jersey:NBA jersey,NFL jersey,NHL jersey,MLB jersey.
All of our products are in high quality with competitive price,safe
and fast delivery.You can mix brands and sizes and colors when place
orders.
www.sneaker-shop08.com
www.sneaker-shop08.com

T Shirt: Lacoste T Shirt $9,Ralph Lauren T Shirt $9, A&F T Shirts
$18,ED Hardry $13,

T-shirts(lacoste T-shirt,polo T-shirt,EVISU T-shirt,bape T-shirt,NBA
sport clothing),

please look our website ,have more mode shoes clothing hat cap bags !

wholesale Lacoste polo t shirt www.sneaker-shop08.com
wholesale Lacoste t shirt solid color www.sneaker-shop08.com
wholesale Lacoste sweater www.sneaker-shop08.com
wholesale Lacoste shirt www.sneaker-shop08.com
wholesale Lacoste www.sneaker-shop08.com
wholesale Ralph lauren www.sneaker-shop08.com
wholesale Ralph Lauren polo www.sneaker-shop08.com
wholesale Polo www.sneaker-shop08.com
wholesale Ralph lauren polo t shirt www.sneaker-shop08.com
wholesale Ralph lauren t shirt www.sneaker-shop08.com
wholesale Abercrombie & fitch shirt www.sneaker-shop08.com
wholesale Burberry shirt www.sneaker-shop08.com
wholesale Burberry t shirt www.sneaker-shop08.com
wholesale NBA sports jersey www.sneaker-shop08.com

T-Shirts
AFF T-shirt
ARMANI T-shirt www.sneaker-shop08.com
BAPE T-shirt
BBC T-shirt www.sneaker-shop08.com
BOSS T-shirt www.sneaker-shop08.com
Burberry T-shirt
CA T-shirt men's www.sneaker-shop08.com
CA T-shirt women's
COOGI T-shirt
CRYSTAL ROCK women's
D&G T-shirt www.sneaker-shop08.com
DIESEL T-shirt
DSQUARED T-shirt men's
DSQUARED T-shirt women's
Eck? Unltd T-shirt
ED T-shirt men's
ED T-shirt women's www.sneaker-shop08.com
EVISU T-shirt
GGG T-shirt
G-STAR T-shirt
HLST T-Shirt www.sneaker-shop08.com
Lacoste T-shirt
Lacoste T-shirt women's
LRG T-shirt
O&L T-shirt www.sneaker-shop08.com
POLO 3 T-shirt
POLO 4 T-shirt
POLO 5 T-shirt www.sneaker-shop08.com
POLO T-shirt men's
POLO T-shirt women's
Prada T-shirt
RUEHL T-Shirt www.sneaker-shop08.com
SMET T-Shirt men's
SMET T-Shirt women's www.sneaker-shop08.com
VERSACE T-shirt
A&F Abercrombie & Fitch T-shirt men's
A&F Abercrombie & Fitch T-shirt women's

wholesale Lacoste polo t shirt cheap wholesaler (paypal payment)
( www.niketrade08.cn )
wholesale Lacoste t shirt solid color cheap wholesaler (paypal payment)
( www.niketrade08.cn )
wholesale Lacoste sweater cheap wholesaler (paypal payment)
( www.niketrade08.cn )
wholesale Lacoste shirt cheap wholesaler (paypal payment)
( www.niketrade08.cn )
wholesale Lacoste cheap wholesaler (paypal payment)
( www.niketrade08.cn )
wholesale Ralph lauren cheap wholesaler (paypal payment)
( www.niketrade08.cn )
wholesale Ralph Lauren polo cheap wholesaler (paypal payment)
( www.niketrade08.cn )
wholesale Polo cheap wholesaler (paypal payment)( www.niketrade08.cn )
wholesale Ralph lauren polo t shirt cheap wholesaler (paypal payment)
( www.niketrade08.cn )
wholesale Ralph lauren t shirt cheap wholesaler (paypal payment)
( www.niketrade08.cn )
wholesale Abercrombie & fitch shirt cheap wholesaler (paypal payment)
( www.niketrade08.cn )
wholesale Burberry shirt cheap wholesaler (paypal payment)
( www.niketrade08.cn )
wholesale Burberry t shirt cheap wholesaler (paypal payment)
( www.niketrade08.cn )
wholesale NBA sports jersey cheap wholesaler (paypal payment)
( www.niketrade08.cn )

T-Shirts
AFF T-shirt
ARMANI T-shirt cheap wholesaler (paypal payment)
( www.niketrade08.cn )
BAPE T-shirt
BBC T-shirt cheap wholesaler (paypal payment)( www.niketrade08.cn )
BOSS T-shirt cheap wholesaler (paypal payment)( www.niketrade08.cn )
Burberry T-shirt
CA T-shirt men's cheap wholesaler (paypal payment)
( www.niketrade08.cn )
CA T-shirt women's
COOGI T-shirt
CRYSTAL ROCK women's
D&G T-shirt cheap wholesaler (paypal payment)( www.niketrade08.cn )
DIESEL T-shirt
DSQUARED T-shirt men's
DSQUARED T-shirt women's
Eck? Unltd T-shirt
ED T-shirt men's
ED T-shirt women's cheap wholesaler (paypal payment)
( www.niketrade08.cn )
EVISU T-shirt
GGG T-shirt
G-STAR T-shirt
HLST T-Shirt cheap wholesaler (paypal payment)( www.niketrade08.cn )
Lacoste T-shirt
Lacoste T-shirt women's
LRG T-shirt
O&L T-shirt cheap wholesaler (paypal payment)( www.niketrade08.cn )
POLO 3 T-shirt
POLO 4 T-shirt
POLO 5 T-shirt cheap wholesaler (paypal payment)
( www.niketrade08.cn )
POLO T-shirt men's
POLO T-shirt women's
Prada T-shirt
RUEHL T-Shirt cheap wholesaler (paypal payment)( www.niketrade08.cn )
SMET T-Shirt men's
SMET T-Shirt women's cheap wholesaler (paypal payment)
( www.niketrade08.cn )
VERSACE T-shirt
A&F Abercrombie & Fitch T-shirt men's
A&F Abercrombie & Fitch T-shirt women's