[fnftwo] Important Notice

I just saw my FNF mail and saw a message from "amazingnepalxgmaildotcom".....It had to do with Microsoft....I remember reading something about a virus in messages sent concerning Microsoft.   I did NOT open any of the links, and I unsubscribed the member.....it sure doesn't sound like this is a "creative PSP member".....so please take caution.   I may be mistaken about this, and I'll be the first to apologize, but until then.....   Huggers

[fnftwo] Sea Scrap

   I am by the sea again.lol....Mena

http://www.geocities.com/magstags10/215dreaming.htm

[fnftwo] Scrap Day

Today is Tuesday, and you all know what that is!  Scrap Day!!  Even though we'll be on hiatus for two months, we can still send through scraps, though it doesn't have to be on a Tuesday to share an element.  We all love making them, so  let's see if we can find more tutorial links during the next two months.   Have a great Tuesday everyone!   Huggers, Bobbi

Scrap Kit: Delft Subscription Only

[fnftwo] Kate's TTC Dreaming

What a beautiful Frame Kate....Mena

http://www.geocities.com/magstags10/215dreaming.htm

  

[fnftwo] Fw: Neurological test..lol

 

Subject: Neurological test..lol

 

1- Find the C below....Please do not use any cursor help. OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOCOOOOOOOOOOO OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO   2- If you already found the C, now find the 6 below. 99999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999 99999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999 99999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999 69999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999 99999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999 99999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999 3 - Now find the N below. It's a little more difficult. MMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMNMM MMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM MMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM MMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM MMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM This is NOT a joke. If you were able to pass these 3 tests, you can cancel your annual visit to your neurologist. Your brain is great and you're far from having a close?relationship with Alzheimer. Congratulations! Oh. One more test.... Find the 44th USA President.? Well, congratulations, you're not colour blind either!   SENIOR CITIZENS ARE THE NATION'S LEADING CARRIERS OF AIDS HEARING AIDS BAND AIDS ROLL AIDS WALKING AIDS MEDICAL AIDS GOVERNMENT AIDS MOST OF ALL, MONETARY AID TO THEIR KIDS Give me the grace to see a joke, To get some humor out of life, And pass it on to other folk. I'm only sending this to my 'old' friends.

 

[PSP-Snags] AT.Storm

no mail with banners

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

it.comp.grafica.photoshop - 5 nuovi messaggi in 2 argomenti - digest

it.comp.grafica.photoshop
http://groups.google.com/group/it.comp.grafica.photoshop?hl=it

it.comp.grafica.photoshop@googlegroups.com

Argomenti odierni:

* disegni - 2 messaggi, 2 autori
http://groups.google.com/group/it.comp.grafica.photoshop/t/67d969e057c47401?hl=it
* Come hanno fatto? - 3 messaggi, 3 autori
http://groups.google.com/group/it.comp.grafica.photoshop/t/80a04dc8869753fa?hl=it

==============================================================================
ARGOMENTO: disegni
http://groups.google.com/group/it.comp.grafica.photoshop/t/67d969e057c47401?hl=it
==============================================================================

== 1 di 2 ==
Data: Dom 28 Giu 2009 07:33
Da: "Alexander von Bach"

Buon giorno

Sono nuovo in Adobe Photoshop e vorrei imparare a lavorare su disegni
già fatti.
Potreste indicarmi dove si trovano semplici disegni riguardanti singole
piante o cespugli da scaricare gratuitamente?

Per una gentile risposta Vi sarei molto grato,
cordiali saluti A. Bach

== 2 di 2 ==
Data: Lun 29 Giu 2009 07:07
Da: Fiorelisa

Alexander von Bach ha scritto:
> Buon giorno
>
> Sono nuovo in Adobe Photoshop e vorrei imparare a lavorare su disegni
> già fatti.
> Potreste indicarmi dove si trovano semplici disegni riguardanti singole
> piante o cespugli da scaricare gratuitamente?
>
> Per una gentile risposta Vi sarei molto grato,
> cordiali saluti A. Bach

Disegni di piante? Non so se li preferisci a colori o in bianco e nero,
vettoriali o raster, stile realistico o fumetto. Se ti servono giusto
per fare delle prove tue personali, o se ne vuoi fare anche uso pubblico
(o anche commerciale).

Comunque puoi dare un occhio qui, dove ci sono delle immagini di
pubblico dominio:
http://www.pdclipart.org/
Vai nella sezione 'Plants'.

Un'altra fonte potrebbe essere Google Libri: non mancherà sicuramente
qualche libro di botanica con belle stampe.

==============================================================================
ARGOMENTO: Come hanno fatto?
http://groups.google.com/group/it.comp.grafica.photoshop/t/80a04dc8869753fa?hl=it
==============================================================================

== 1 di 3 ==
Data: Lun 29 Giu 2009 10:34
Da: "Il Nibbio"

Sono un principiante :(, come hanno fatto a fare questo:

http://www.flickr.com/photos/roobdaboot/3668258825/sizes/l/

ciao

== 2 di 3 ==
Data: Lun 29 Giu 2009 14:26
Da: "Technoboyz"

"Il Nibbio" <ilnibbio@iol.it> ha scritto nel messaggio
news:4a48fb42$0$18932$4fafbaef@reader2.news.tin.it...
> Sono un principiante :(, come hanno fatto a fare questo:
>
> http://www.flickr.com/photos/roobdaboot/3668258825/sizes/l/
>
> ciao
>
Bha. mi sfugge qualcosa, dove sta l'incomprensibile?

== 3 di 3 ==
Data: Lun 29 Giu 2009 22:02
Da: giorgio

Technoboyz ha scritto:
> "Il Nibbio" <ilnibbio@iol.it> ha scritto nel messaggio
> news:4a48fb42$0$18932$4fafbaef@reader2.news.tin.it...
>> Sono un principiante :(, come hanno fatto a fare questo:
>>
>> http://www.flickr.com/photos/roobdaboot/3668258825/sizes/l/
>>
>> ciao
>>
> Bha. mi sfugge qualcosa, dove sta l'incomprensibile?
>
>
I 3 personaggi sono replicati due volte. Interessante esperimento anche
se già visto- latcnica non la so.

==============================================================================

Hai ricevuto questo messaggio in quanto sei iscritto al gruppo Google Gruppi "it.comp.grafica.photoshop"
gruppo.

Per postare in questo gruppo, visita la pagina http://groups.google.com/group/it.comp.grafica.photoshop?hl=it

Per annullare l'iscrizione a questo gruppo, invia un'email a it.comp.grafica.photoshop+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com

Per modificare il modo con cui ricevi le email da questo gruppo, visita:
http://groups.google.com/group/it.comp.grafica.photoshop/subscribe?hl=it

Per segnalare un illecito, invia un'email spiegando il problema a abuse@
googlegroups.com


==============================================================================
Google Gruppi: http://groups.google.com/?hl=it

alt.graphics.photoshop - 8 new messages in 3 topics - digest

alt.graphics.photoshop
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.graphics.photoshop?hl=en

alt.graphics.photoshop@googlegroups.com

Today's topics:

* website photo query - 1 messages, 1 author
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.graphics.photoshop/t/0b8927e7a44b9538?hl=en
* How much would a good used Nikon ED5000 slide scanner be worth? - 6 messages,
3 authors
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.graphics.photoshop/t/13032bce01cb0177?hl=en
* out of scratch memory - 1 messages, 1 author
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.graphics.photoshop/t/6b4cca95c7c895a7?hl=en

==============================================================================
TOPIC: website photo query
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.graphics.photoshop/t/0b8927e7a44b9538?hl=en
==============================================================================

== 1 of 1 ==
Date: Sun, Jun 28 2009 5:15 pm
From: Sir F. A. Rien

That was 'true' eons ago when monitor technology was in its infancy.

Current monitors can easily go to 1600 x 1200, that being [on a 19" -
displayable at 18"] some 110 dpi.

As far as bothering to change the dpi setting, why?

Monitors read PIXELS not dpi !!!

I can set an image to 1 dpi and to 10,000 dpi image, put them up side by
side on the web and they will be exactly the same - unless I've resampled!

"CB" <CB@PrayForMe.com> found these unused words:

>
>"Paul Burdett" <pburdett@optusnet.com.au> wrote in message
>news:4a46e760$0$15277$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au...
>> Thank you to all for your feedback...much appreciated.
>>
>> Paul
>
>I was once told by a dude who worked with AOL and pioneered the 'gif' format
>that monitors can't read beyond 75 dpi so take raw image hit ctrl > i >i,
>change the dpi. Notice the dimensions change. Change the values to what you
>want as long as they're not bigger than from where you started and
>'constrain proportions' is checked, obviously.
>
>>
>>
>> "Sir F. A. Rien" <jaSPAMc@gbr.online.com> wrote in message
>> news:1l8c459ninlof2h9uvqf8ofkdr6t2t31tf@4ax.com...
>>> "Paul Burdett" <pburdett@optusnet.com.au> found these unused words:
>>>
>>>>Hi all,
>>>>
>>>>I've put together a website for my wife which displays photos of her
>>>>craft
>>>>items. I take the photos and edit in Photoshop CS3. The photos are 72dpi
>>>>when opened in Photoshop. I'm not sure if this is right, but I've been
>>>>cropping each photo as needed and saving as 300dpi, and then resampling
>>>>down
>>>>to the max allowed by the website host...which is 450dpi on the longest
>>>>side. This results in thumbnails on the website which can be clicked on
>>>>to
>>>>get a larger version. I'm thinking that I don't need to resample to
>>>>300dpi?
>>>>Is this correct? The file size of each thumbnail is around 40kb or so.
>>>>Any
>>>>advice appreciated.
>>>>Cheers,
>>>>
>>>>Paul
>>>>
>>>>The website is www.littleextras.net
>>>>
>>>
>>> For the web, the 'dpi' is unimportant !
>>>
>>> Crop, adjust, and SAVE AS [master].
>>> {Don't save over the original!]
>>>
>>> Resize to the thumbnail and SAVE AS [thumb].
>>>
>>> For me, I use a name with "_w" added for the full size WEB image and a
>>> "_t"
>>> for the thumbnail.
>>>
>>> This way they are 'stored' together and I can find them for uploading or
>>> later work.
>>>
>>> Example:
>>> cali-01_w.jpg 600x400 display page
>>> cali-01_t.jpg 188x125 thumbnail in the opening page.
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>

==============================================================================
TOPIC: How much would a good used Nikon ED5000 slide scanner be worth?
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.graphics.photoshop/t/13032bce01cb0177?hl=en
==============================================================================

== 1 of 6 ==
Date: Mon, Jun 29 2009 1:18 am
From: Peter

I bought one of these, with the bulk feeder, to scan in a few thousand
slides.

It paid for itself on that one job but I now want to sell it.

Obviously there is Ebay but this is a fairly pricey and specialised
item. I think the lot cost about £1500.

Does anybody have any better ideas?

== 2 of 6 ==
Date: Mon, Jun 29 2009 4:36 am
From: Dudley Simons

Peter wrote:
> I bought one of these, with the bulk feeder, to scan in a few thousand
> slides.
>
> It paid for itself on that one job but I now want to sell it.
>
> Obviously there is Ebay but this is a fairly pricey and specialised
> item. I think the lot cost about £1500.
>
> Does anybody have any better ideas?

Hi Peter

I am afraid i can't help you much with a value on your
scanner...................

but I was rather hoping that as you have actually used this unit
extensively you might be able to pass on some information about it! -
Rather than the twaddle that some spotty faced oik who has never seen
one outside of its box let alone actually used one would spout when asked!

I have a big digitisation project coming up at work and am trying to
persuade the bean counters that we should invest in a decent slide
scanner and bulk feed unit.

How did you get on with it? I assume that you ran it with the software
supplied (I assume that Nikon actually supply scanning software!)rather
than via Photoshop. I take it that the Nikon app scans and then saves
files as it goes rather than trying to leave them all open within
Photoshop or CS. Is the scanning ap any good?

Any problems with the bulk feed mechanism. I guess that any slightly dog
eared kodachromes will have to be remounted into plastic, but how does
it cope with ultra thin Leitz mounts and old GAF mounts that are as
thick as paving slabs? Did you run any glass mounted slides through it?
Or slides with sticky labels that are lifting at the corners etc?

Did you find any 'gotchas' - those less than endearing short comings in
the software, scanner design or functionality that you only find out
once you start using it in anger?

Any pointers would be much appreciated - and good luck with findig a
buyer. :o)

regards

Dudley

PS - remove THE.OBVIOUS to reply off group!

== 3 of 6 ==
Date: Mon, Jun 29 2009 5:23 am
From: Rob

Dudley Simons wrote:
> Peter wrote:
>> I bought one of these, with the bulk feeder, to scan in a few thousand
>> slides.
>>
>> It paid for itself on that one job but I now want to sell it.
>>
>> Obviously there is Ebay but this is a fairly pricey and specialised
>> item. I think the lot cost about £1500.
>>
>> Does anybody have any better ideas?
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Hi Peter
>
> I am afraid i can't help you much with a value on your
> scanner...................
>
> but I was rather hoping that as you have actually used this unit
> extensively you might be able to pass on some information about it! -
> Rather than the twaddle that some spotty faced oik who has never seen
> one outside of its box let alone actually used one would spout when asked!
>
> I have a big digitisation project coming up at work and am trying to
> persuade the bean counters that we should invest in a decent slide
> scanner and bulk feed unit.
>
> How did you get on with it? I assume that you ran it with the software
> supplied (I assume that Nikon actually supply scanning software!)rather
> than via Photoshop. I take it that the Nikon app scans and then saves
> files as it goes rather than trying to leave them all open within
> Photoshop or CS. Is the scanning ap any good?
>
> Any problems with the bulk feed mechanism. I guess that any slightly dog
> eared kodachromes will have to be remounted into plastic, but how does
> it cope with ultra thin Leitz mounts and old GAF mounts that are as
> thick as paving slabs? Did you run any glass mounted slides through it?
> Or slides with sticky labels that are lifting at the corners etc?
>
> Did you find any 'gotchas' - those less than endearing short comings in
> the software, scanner design or functionality that you only find out
> once you start using it in anger?
>
> Any pointers would be much appreciated - and good luck with findig a
> buyer. :o)
>
>
>
> regards
>
>
>
>
> Dudley
>
>
>
> PS - remove THE.OBVIOUS to reply off group!

What do you have to digitise are they only 35mm slides and what do your
require as the end result?

As a slide scanner may not be the answer.

r

== 4 of 6 ==
Date: Mon, Jun 29 2009 6:51 am
From: Dudley Simons

Rob wrote:
> Dudley Simons wrote:
>> Peter wrote:
>>> I bought one of these, with the bulk feeder, to scan in a few thousand
>>> slides.
>>>
>>> It paid for itself on that one job but I now want to sell it.
>>>
>>> Obviously there is Ebay but this is a fairly pricey and specialised
>>> item. I think the lot cost about £1500.
>>>
>>> Does anybody have any better ideas?
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Hi Peter
>>
>> I am afraid i can't help you much with a value on your
>> scanner...................
>>
>> but I was rather hoping that as you have actually used this unit
>> extensively you might be able to pass on some information about it! -
>> Rather than the twaddle that some spotty faced oik who has never seen
>> one outside of its box let alone actually used one would spout when
>> asked!
>>
>> I have a big digitisation project coming up at work and am trying to
>> persuade the bean counters that we should invest in a decent slide
>> scanner and bulk feed unit.
>>
>> How did you get on with it? I assume that you ran it with the software
>> supplied (I assume that Nikon actually supply scanning software!)rather
>> than via Photoshop. I take it that the Nikon app scans and then saves
>> files as it goes rather than trying to leave them all open within
>> Photoshop or CS. Is the scanning ap any good?
>>
>> Any problems with the bulk feed mechanism. I guess that any slightly dog
>> eared kodachromes will have to be remounted into plastic, but how does
>> it cope with ultra thin Leitz mounts and old GAF mounts that are as
>> thick as paving slabs? Did you run any glass mounted slides through it?
>> Or slides with sticky labels that are lifting at the corners etc?
>>
>> Did you find any 'gotchas' - those less than endearing short comings in
>> the software, scanner design or functionality that you only find out
>> once you start using it in anger?
>>
>> Any pointers would be much appreciated - and good luck with findig a
>> buyer. :o)
>>
>>
>>
>> regards
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Dudley
>>
>>
>>
>> PS - remove THE.OBVIOUS to reply off group!
>
> What do you have to digitise are they only 35mm slides and what do your
> require as the end result?
>
>
> As a slide scanner may not be the answer.
>
> r
>

I take it you mean digitising the slides by shooting them with a camera?

I have a Bowens Illumitran which I have used in the past to digitize
slides very successfully with a Nikon D2X.

regards

Dudley

== 5 of 6 ==
Date: Mon, Jun 29 2009 9:30 am
From: Rob

Dudley Simons wrote:
> Rob wrote:
>> Dudley Simons wrote:
>>> Peter wrote:
>>>> I bought one of these, with the bulk feeder, to scan in a few thousand
>>>> slides.
>>>>
>>>> It paid for itself on that one job but I now want to sell it.
>>>>
>>>> Obviously there is Ebay but this is a fairly pricey and specialised
>>>> item. I think the lot cost about £1500.
>>>>
>>>> Does anybody have any better ideas?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Hi Peter
>>>
>>> I am afraid i can't help you much with a value on your
>>> scanner...................
>>>
>>> but I was rather hoping that as you have actually used this unit
>>> extensively you might be able to pass on some information about it! -
>>> Rather than the twaddle that some spotty faced oik who has never seen
>>> one outside of its box let alone actually used one would spout when
>>> asked!
>>>
>>> I have a big digitisation project coming up at work and am trying to
>>> persuade the bean counters that we should invest in a decent slide
>>> scanner and bulk feed unit.
>>>
>>> How did you get on with it? I assume that you ran it with the software
>>> supplied (I assume that Nikon actually supply scanning software!)rather
>>> than via Photoshop. I take it that the Nikon app scans and then saves
>>> files as it goes rather than trying to leave them all open within
>>> Photoshop or CS. Is the scanning ap any good?
>>>
>>> Any problems with the bulk feed mechanism. I guess that any slightly dog
>>> eared kodachromes will have to be remounted into plastic, but how does
>>> it cope with ultra thin Leitz mounts and old GAF mounts that are as
>>> thick as paving slabs? Did you run any glass mounted slides through it?
>>> Or slides with sticky labels that are lifting at the corners etc?
>>>
>>> Did you find any 'gotchas' - those less than endearing short comings in
>>> the software, scanner design or functionality that you only find out
>>> once you start using it in anger?
>>>
>>> Any pointers would be much appreciated - and good luck with findig a
>>> buyer. :o)
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> regards
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Dudley
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> PS - remove THE.OBVIOUS to reply off group!
>>
>> What do you have to digitise are they only 35mm slides and what do
>> your require as the end result?
>>
>>
>> As a slide scanner may not be the answer.
>>
>> r
>>
>
>
> I take it you mean digitising the slides by shooting them with a camera?
>
> I have a Bowens Illumitran which I have used in the past to digitize
> slides very successfully with a Nikon D2X.
>
>
> regards
>
>
> Dudley

Thats what I use, results are satisfactory, quick to use, small file
size etc.

Slides or tranny stuff that's for critical use are scanned.

But for most yes just copy them with the Bowens with the bulbs.

Very rarely does the scanner get used.

r

== 6 of 6 ==
Date: Mon, Jun 29 2009 10:16 am
From: Peter

Dudley Simons <drs1005@esc.cam.ac.uk> wrote

>Peter wrote:
>> I bought one of these, with the bulk feeder, to scan in a few thousand
>> slides.
>>
>> It paid for itself on that one job but I now want to sell it.
>>
>> Obviously there is Ebay but this is a fairly pricey and specialised
>> item. I think the lot cost about £1500.
>>
>> Does anybody have any better ideas?
>
>
>
>
>
>
>Hi Peter
>
>I am afraid i can't help you much with a value on your
>scanner...................
>
>but I was rather hoping that as you have actually used this unit
>extensively you might be able to pass on some information about it! -
>Rather than the twaddle that some spotty faced oik who has never seen
>one outside of its box let alone actually used one would spout when asked!
>
>I have a big digitisation project coming up at work and am trying to
>persuade the bean counters that we should invest in a decent slide
>scanner and bulk feed unit.
>
>How did you get on with it? I assume that you ran it with the software
>supplied (I assume that Nikon actually supply scanning software!)rather
>than via Photoshop. I take it that the Nikon app scans and then saves
>files as it goes rather than trying to leave them all open within
>Photoshop or CS. Is the scanning ap any good?

The software is Nikon's own and can save to BMP, TIFF, Jpeg etc. It is
clunky but works. Loads of options for things like dust removal (does
a double scan) and enhancement which I never used.

I scanned the lot into uncompressed TIFFs, about 80MB each, and then
batch-reduced them in Photoshop into ~ 7MB Jpegs - simply because I
*hope* that PS does a better job of it than any other software out
there. It is certainly practically impossible to see a difference with
the naked eye, at 100% zoom.

>Any problems with the bulk feed mechanism. I guess that any slightly dog
>eared kodachromes will have to be remounted into plastic, but how does
>it cope with ultra thin Leitz mounts and old GAF mounts that are as
>thick as paving slabs? Did you run any glass mounted slides through it?
> Or slides with sticky labels that are lifting at the corners etc?

I didn't have problems with any slides, 1970s onwards. Damaged ones
won't work, sure, but I didn't have any of those. I did scan glass
mounted ones too. The feeder takes about 50 at a time.

I think if you will have problems then it might be with the very thin
paper ones. But for me everything worked.

>Did you find any 'gotchas' - those less than endearing short comings in
>the software, scanner design or functionality that you only find out
>once you start using it in anger?

The software is a bit odd in the way it works but once you suss it, it
just runs and runs.

The quality is stunning - as good as the film itself ever managed.

I am uploading some images here

http://www.zen74158.zen.co.uk/ed5000/

One of these, file3012.jpg, was used to compare the ED5000 against
another Nikon scanner costing about £5000 and neither myself nor the
shop could see any difference.

>Any pointers would be much appreciated - and good luck with findig a
>buyer. :o)

Well, mine will be for sale; looking for about £500 :) In original
packaging, with cables, software, etc.

I was quoted a min of 50p each for commercial scanning, and one firm
wanted £10 each!

My email is above but replace o with 0 and 0 with o.

>regards
>
>
>
>
>Dudley
>
>
>
>PS - remove THE.OBVIOUS to reply off group!

==============================================================================
TOPIC: out of scratch memory
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.graphics.photoshop/t/6b4cca95c7c895a7?hl=en
==============================================================================

== 1 of 1 ==
Date: Mon, Jun 29 2009 11:22 pm
From: pshaw@emmet.com

during various procedures in photoshop, like converting a bunch of
large raw files to jpg's, or using the magic wand on a large image, i
get a message "out of scratch memory" or a more generic "this
procedure cannot be done" (or something like this)

i have a separate hard drive being used just for photoshop's scratch
memory and have devoted 70% of free memory to photoshop (i'm running 4
gigs in windows xp pro) ....

i have turned off almost all ongoing programs (anti-virus etc) which
indeed does help ....

any suggestions to provide more scratch memory?

tia

steve

==============================================================================

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "alt.graphics.photoshop"
group.

To post to this group, visit http://groups.google.com/group/alt.graphics.photoshop?hl=en

To unsubscribe from this group, send email to alt.graphics.photoshop+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com

To change the way you get mail from this group, visit:
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.graphics.photoshop/subscribe?hl=en

To report abuse, send email explaining the problem to abuse@googlegroups.com

==============================================================================
Google Groups: http://groups.google.com/?hl=en

adobe.photoshop.windows - 5 new messages in 3 topics - digest

adobe.photoshop.windows
http://groups.google.com/group/adobe.photoshop.windows?hl=en

adobe.photoshop.windows@googlegroups.com

Today's topics:

* Help: how to create shadows? - 2 messages, 2 authors
http://groups.google.com/group/adobe.photoshop.windows/t/13be365e49350faa?hl=en
* dyeline.com - 1 messages, 1 author
http://groups.google.com/group/adobe.photoshop.windows/t/c3703ffa7806b10c?hl=en
* not enough scratch memory - 2 messages, 2 authors
http://groups.google.com/group/adobe.photoshop.windows/t/58d5f92e486faf3b?hl=en

==============================================================================
TOPIC: Help: how to create shadows?
http://groups.google.com/group/adobe.photoshop.windows/t/13be365e49350faa?hl=en
==============================================================================

== 1 of 2 ==
Date: Sat, Jun 27 2009 3:51 pm
From: blacklight

Have uploaded a shot 'THE NON-CONFORMIST' (http://www.oz-
greetings.com.au/photo). It shows many matchsticks in Australia's
outback. Each stick ought to have a shadow . I tried to paint it in by
hand - impossible. Does anyone know of a way to do it?
Thanks for help - Klaus and Rusty

== 2 of 2 ==
Date: Mon, Jun 29 2009 1:32 am
From: Bigguy

blacklight wrote:
> Have uploaded a shot 'THE NON-CONFORMIST' (http://www.oz-
> greetings.com.au/photo). It shows many matchsticks in Australia's
> outback. Each stick ought to have a shadow . I tried to paint it in by
> hand - impossible. Does anyone know of a way to do it?
> Thanks for help - Klaus and Rusty
Well....

Duplicate the matches onto a new layer.

Use levels /selection etc. to make matches black on a transparent
background.

Use free transform to align black matches to original image, scale and
give direction of shadow.

Use opacity etc. to blend shadows into image.

There are other ways too...

Guy

==============================================================================
TOPIC: dyeline.com
http://groups.google.com/group/adobe.photoshop.windows/t/c3703ffa7806b10c?hl=en
==============================================================================

== 1 of 1 ==
Date: Mon, Jun 29 2009 8:29 pm
From: ralph@dyeline.com

I just created a website for structural and graphic designers called
www.dyeline.com

The primary objective of the site is to allow people to download free
folding carton dieline templates in Adobe illustrator CS3 PDF format,
as well as DXF and DFT formats. Users of the site do not have to
register to download available files, but they have to register to
become a member of the forum. If you are looking for a specific
dieline template, email me at:

ralph@dyeline.com

Thanks,

Ralph

==============================================================================
TOPIC: not enough scratch memory
http://groups.google.com/group/adobe.photoshop.windows/t/58d5f92e486faf3b?hl=en
==============================================================================

== 1 of 2 ==
Date: Mon, Jun 29 2009 11:19 pm
From: pshaw@emmet.com

during various procedures in photoshop, like converting a bunch of
large raw files to jpg's, or using the magic wand on a large image, i
get a message "out of scratch memory" or a more generic "this
procedure cannot be done" (or something like this)

i have a separate hard drive being used just for photoshop's scratch
memory and have devoted 70% of free memory to photoshop (i'm running 4
gigs in windows xp pro) ....

i have turned off almost all ongoing programs (anti-virus etc) which
indeed does help ....

any suggestions to provide more scratch memory?

tia

steve

== 2 of 2 ==
Date: Tues, Jun 30 2009 12:04 am
From: Rob

pshaw@emmet.com wrote:
> during various procedures in photoshop, like converting a bunch of
> large raw files to jpg's, or using the magic wand on a large image, i
> get a message "out of scratch memory" or a more generic "this
> procedure cannot be done" (or something like this)
>
> i have a separate hard drive being used just for photoshop's scratch
> memory and have devoted 70% of free memory to photoshop (i'm running 4
> gigs in windows xp pro) ....
>
> i have turned off almost all ongoing programs (anti-virus etc) which
> indeed does help ....
>
> any suggestions to provide more scratch memory?
>
> tia
>
> steve

What version of PS?

==============================================================================

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "adobe.photoshop.windows"
group.

To post to this group, visit http://groups.google.com/group/adobe.photoshop.windows?hl=en

To unsubscribe from this group, send email to adobe.photoshop.windows+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com

To change the way you get mail from this group, visit:
http://groups.google.com/group/adobe.photoshop.windows/subscribe?hl=en

To report abuse, send email explaining the problem to abuse@googlegroups.com

==============================================================================
Google Groups: http://groups.google.com/?hl=en

alt.design.graphics - 2 new messages in 2 topics - digest

This summary is not available. Please click here to view the post.

adobe.photoshop.elements - 4 new messages in 3 topics - digest

adobe.photoshop.elements
http://groups.google.com/group/adobe.photoshop.elements?hl=en

adobe.photoshop.elements@googlegroups.com

Today's topics:

* F1 Help Key - Unexpected Behavior - 2 messages, 2 authors
http://groups.google.com/group/adobe.photoshop.elements/t/f5b64425a3c4fd9a?hl=en
* Half image washed out - 1 messages, 1 author
http://groups.google.com/group/adobe.photoshop.elements/t/805fb4cff56d46f6?hl=en
* Authentication - 1 messages, 1 author
http://groups.google.com/group/adobe.photoshop.elements/t/2a8460308b991495?hl=en

==============================================================================
TOPIC: F1 Help Key - Unexpected Behavior
http://groups.google.com/group/adobe.photoshop.elements/t/f5b64425a3c4fd9a?hl=en
==============================================================================

== 1 of 2 ==
Date: Sun, Jun 28 2009 12:10 pm
From: Greg

I understand pressing the F1 key in PSE7 is supposed to get me online help
from the Adobe website. However, when I press F1 the URL that appears in my
browser's address window (Firefox) is the following:
http://help.adobe.com/en_US/PhotoshopElements/7.0_Win/search.html?AH_ION=true

All that gets me is a browser window which displays this link:
http://community.adobe.com/help

This is a generic link to ALL Adobe products help. I believe F1 should
instead be taking me to this URL:
http://help.adobe.com/en_US/PhotoshopElements/7.0_Win

Anyone know how to fix this? Thanks.

Greg

== 2 of 2 ==
Date: Mon, Jun 29 2009 10:15 am
From: Jeffrey Kaplan

Previously on adobe.photoshop.elements, Greg said:

> I understand pressing the F1 key in PSE7 is supposed to get me online help
> from the Adobe website. However, when I press F1 the URL that appears in my
> browser's address window (Firefox) is the following:
> http://help.adobe.com/en_US/PhotoshopElements/7.0_Win/search.html?AH_ION=true
>
> All that gets me is a browser window which displays this link:
> http://community.adobe.com/help
>
> This is a generic link to ALL Adobe products help. I believe F1 should
> instead be taking me to this URL:
> http://help.adobe.com/en_US/PhotoshopElements/7.0_Win
>
> Anyone know how to fix this? Thanks.

Complain to Adobe?

The Adobe web site is redirecting the URL. The problem is on their
end, there is nothing you can do about it from your end.

--
Jeffrey Kaplan www.gordol.org
Double ROT13 encoded for your protection

"To know what people really think, pay regard to what they do, rather
than what they say." - Rene Descartes

==============================================================================
TOPIC: Half image washed out
http://groups.google.com/group/adobe.photoshop.elements/t/805fb4cff56d46f6?hl=en
==============================================================================

== 1 of 1 ==
Date: Mon, Jun 29 2009 2:00 pm
From: Jimbo

On Jun 22, 12:36 pm, "Leo Lichtman" <leo.licht...@att.net> wrote:
> "Jimbo" wrote:  (clip) This brings me to another question,
>
> what is the correct strategy for tackling a problem image like this?
> Apply general fix to background to optimize it followed by adjustment
> layers, etc.
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> Evidently you are serious, but I am still puzzled about this.  You attribute
> the unevenness in the image to a difference in indoor/outdoor temperature?
> I don't see how this is possible.  Please explain.  As to making the two
> parts look alike, I would make two layers, and work on work on each part
> separately--then use an eraser to make them blend so the seam does not show.

Why do you question my seriousness? Was my initial question really
so .... simplistic? If so, it shows how little I know :)
The camera was taken from the very warm indoors to the cold outdoors
and condensation formed on the optics. This cleared over the course
of 15 or 20 minutes so that later images from the same session were
fine but a few of the earlier ones were messed up. It is one of those
earlier ones that I am working on. Thanks for your suggestion.

==============================================================================
TOPIC: Authentication
http://groups.google.com/group/adobe.photoshop.elements/t/2a8460308b991495?hl=en
==============================================================================

== 1 of 1 ==
Date: Mon, Jun 29 2009 7:48 pm
From: "Larry B. Block"

I have been using APE 2 and am thinking about moving up to 5, 6 or 7 (used).
I have heard that Adobe has gone the authentication route that makes the
newer versions harder to install as used programs. Versions 2 and 3 required
no such authentication. Which versions do, which don't, and if they do, what
must one do to get them authenticated.

Thanks!! Lar

==============================================================================

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "adobe.photoshop.elements"
group.

To post to this group, visit http://groups.google.com/group/adobe.photoshop.elements?hl=en

To unsubscribe from this group, send email to adobe.photoshop.elements+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com

To change the way you get mail from this group, visit:
http://groups.google.com/group/adobe.photoshop.elements/subscribe?hl=en

To report abuse, send email explaining the problem to abuse@googlegroups.com

==============================================================================
Google Groups: http://groups.google.com/?hl=en