rec.photo.digital
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.photo.digital?hl=en
rec.photo.digital@googlegroups.com
Today's topics:
* Scenic areas in England - 23 messages, 4 authors
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.photo.digital/t/1076be556766c491?hl=en
* Why EVFs will replace reflex systems - 1 messages, 1 author
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.photo.digital/t/ddb39c7b20935920?hl=en
* Spanking For A Good Cause - 1 messages, 1 author
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.photo.digital/t/213486fd88e75dfb?hl=en
* New Mandate: Filters! - 1 messages, 1 author
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.photo.digital/t/6ca44008ad5d3083?hl=en
==============================================================================
TOPIC: Scenic areas in England
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.photo.digital/t/1076be556766c491?hl=en
==============================================================================
== 1 of 23 ==
Date: Tues, May 12 2009 11:57 pm
From: Chris H
In message <moKdnUwzSZ02aJTXnZ2dnUVZ_i1i4p2d@giganews.com>, Ron Hunter
<rphunter@charter.net> writes
>Savageduck wrote:
>> On 2009-05-12 13:33:10 -0700, "Stormin Mormon" <cayoung61**spamblock
>>##@hotmail.com> said:
>>
>>> Mostly I use socialism as a descriptor for excessive
>>> government regulation.
>> ...and therein lies your problem.
>> You are actually ignorant as to what "socialism" is or means.
>> You are not even aware there are Marxist and non-Marxist social
>>theories, and none of the accepted definitions meet your personal
>>fabrication.
>> I have a feeling your idea of socialism grew from over exposure to
>>the Cheney/Limbaugh postulation.
>>
>
>In a practical sense, a country practices socialism when it takes money
>from someone via taxes, and gives it to someone else who didn't earn
>it. Under than definition, both the US, and UK are socialist
>countries.
By that definition ALL countries are socialist and all countries since
the beginning of time,.
Clearly your definition of socialism is different to that used by the
rest of the world
--
\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\
\/\/\/\/\ Chris Hills Staffs England /\/\/\/\/
\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/
== 2 of 23 ==
Date: Wed, May 13 2009 12:01 am
From: Chris H
In message <bogus-5863ED.23241912052009@news.albasani.net>, Jack Campin
- bogus address <bogus@purr.demon.co.uk> writes
>>> I am sure there are plenty of UK citizens who DON'T believe in
>>> gun control,
>> sorry, I misread that, no, there are not more than a handfull,
>> that's the interesting point.
>
>It's a bit stronger than that. It's not just an abstract matter of
>rights, it's about what sort of *people* gun owners are perceived as
>being, and even more so, self-righteously argumentative gun owners.
>I very much doubt if any British reader of this group would let Chris
>H anywhere near their children.
Don't know about that but I have worked with youth groups.
>The general perception is that private gun owners are either Nazis,
>criminals, or paedophiles, and of the three,
Depends in which tabloid you read:-)
> the criminals are the
>least unwholesome - at least they need them for their job.
:-)
>The other stereotype is "ex-squaddie coming back from Iraq with
>a gun and blowing away his family in a psychotic frenzy", but
>people tend to be more sympathetic to such mental illness.
True.
--
\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\
\/\/\/\/\ Chris Hills Staffs England /\/\/\/\/
\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/
== 3 of 23 ==
Date: Wed, May 13 2009 12:27 am
From: Ron Hunter
Jack Campin - bogus address wrote:
>>> I am sure there are plenty of UK citizens who DON'T believe in
>>> gun control,
>> sorry, I misread that, no, there are not more than a handfull,
>> that's the interesting point.
>
> It's a bit stronger than that. It's not just an abstract matter of
> rights, it's about what sort of *people* gun owners are perceived as
> being, and even more so, self-righteously argumentative gun owners.
> I very much doubt if any British reader of this group would let Chris
> H anywhere near their children.
>
> The general perception is that private gun owners are either Nazis,
> criminals, or paedophiles, and of the three, the criminals are the
> least unwholesome - at least they need them for their job.
>
> The other stereotype is "ex-squaddie coming back from Iraq with
> a gun and blowing away his family in a psychotic frenzy", but
> people tend to be more sympathetic to such mental illness.
>
So, it's ok to come home from a war and blow away your family, but
keeping a handgun in order to protect your family, and property from
criminals is a bad thing, relegating one to the status of Nazis, or
pedophiles? You guys have a rather strange way of looking a things.
== 4 of 23 ==
Date: Wed, May 13 2009 12:36 am
From: Ron Hunter
Jack Campin - bogus address wrote:
>>>> Drive from Hood River, Oregon to 'The Dalles'. The climate, and
>>>> topography will change from sub-tropical to desert, in 20 miles!
>>> Something most Americans don't appreciate is ALL countries are like
>>> that. The variations in the US are not really any more different to the
>>> variations in most other countries.
>> I have been a lot of places, and I have never seen such a drastic change
>> in the nature of vegetation, and temperature/humidity as there.
>
> Rize to Yusufeli via the Kackar mountains. Temperate rainforest
> climate with tea plantations to calcite crystals sticking out of
> sunbaked clay with 3000-metre permanent Alpine snow in between.
> With three non-Turkish-speaking linguistic minorities who've been
> there for at least 3000 years.
>
In Oregon, the transition is quite flat. Which adds to the shock
factor. I was totally amazed. I am used to such changes over several
hundred miles, or when altitude causes the changes more abruptly, but
the Oregon experience was quite unique in my experience. It felt like I
was in a southwestern desert area, like Arizona or New Mexico. I REALLY
didn't like it.
== 5 of 23 ==
Date: Wed, May 13 2009 12:38 am
From: "Mike"
On 13 May 2009 00:50:40 GMT, Chris Malcolm <cam@holyrood.ed.ac.uk>
wrote:
>> I haven't noticed Brits bringing anything new to the medical treatment
>> payment discussion other than their general defensiviseness about their own
>> system.
>
>I learned long ago never to discuss health care in American dominated
>newsgroups.
a fact, along with gun control (which didn't thankfully get into the
nonsense about "only people are dangerous, guns are not dangerous"
which is an attempt by the gun lobby to redefine language and logic)
that proves there is a lot for Americans to find different by leaving
their culture, however much the shape of mailboxes varies from state
to state.
--
Mike
== 6 of 23 ==
Date: Wed, May 13 2009 12:40 am
From: "Mike"
On Tue, 12 May 2009 21:42:42 +0100, Jack Campin - bogus address
<bogus@purr.demon.co.uk> wrote:
> I would like to map the
>> places where the greatest change occurs in the shortest mileage. Its
>> probably going to be where sea or serious mountains block cultural
>> transfer or maybe totalitarian states. Then of course you could look
>> at purely landscape change.
>
>Gaza to Israel.
that's a pretty hot favourite, you might say Israel to anywhere around
it?
--
Mike
== 7 of 23 ==
Date: Wed, May 13 2009 12:41 am
From: "Mike"
On Tue, 12 May 2009 13:49:57 -0700, Savageduck
<savageduck1{REMOVESPAM}@me.com> wrote:
>>> One idea has occurred to me from this thread, I would like to map the
>>> places where the greatest change occurs in the shortest mileage. Its
>>> probably going to be where sea or serious mountains block cultural
>>> transfer or maybe totalitarian states. Then of course you could look
>>> at purely landscape change.
>>
>> Gaza to Israel.
>
>Wouldn't that come under cultural change?
Yes, I don't see how that debars it although it would nice to have
contenders on other bases.
--
Mike
== 8 of 23 ==
Date: Wed, May 13 2009 12:44 am
From: "Mike"
On Tue, 12 May 2009 11:15:34 -0700, Savageduck
<savageduck1{REMOVESPAM}@me.com> wrote:
>>> Strange, you guys don't sound Mexican :-)
>>
>> Lost me on that one...
>
>OK.
>It might be in bad taste, but it was meant to refer to one of those
>humorous racial stereotype interactions when dealing with mythical male
>endowment with regard to certain ethnicities.
we would need to travel outside our culture to somewhere that did anti
Mexican jokes to understand it.......
--
Mike
== 9 of 23 ==
Date: Wed, May 13 2009 12:49 am
From: "Mike"
On Tue, 12 May 2009 19:56:37 +0100, "Keith Willshaw"
<keith@nospam.kwillshaw.demon.co.uk> wrote:
>There are several in the Lake District and Peak District national parks
>to my certain knowledge as well as several in North Yorkshire that
>I have travelled down
>
>http://www.lake-district.gov.uk/gtga_dr_list.htm?callback=1&keyword=grd&department=Other&category=Leaflet&month=Month&year=Year&image.x=0&image.y=0&hidesearch=true
the green road in the ELD that I have seen was being used by two full
on 4x4s with some difficulty, with disgusted walkers looking on, I do
not want to be in that situation
>There are also a number of Forest Drives , the Kileder Forest Drive is a
>rather beautiful strecth of unsealed road that runs for 12 miles or so
>that takes you over a 1500 ft summit
thanks for reminding me, I did that in an MG Maestro many years back
and it ended up *completely* covered in mud :-)
>Dalby Forest Drive is rather shorter but also stunning
noted!
--
Mike
== 10 of 23 ==
Date: Wed, May 13 2009 12:51 am
From: "Mike"
On Tue, 12 May 2009 23:58:23 -0400, tony cooper
<tony_cooper213@earthlink.net> wrote:
> I really can't see how any ordinary US road
>is more or less difficult on a Harley or a Ducati. You just have to
>keep the leash on a Ducati.
exactly, the Harley is suited to cruising, the Ducati to racing.
--
Mike
== 11 of 23 ==
Date: Wed, May 13 2009 12:55 am
From: Savageduck
On 2009-05-13 00:41:53 -0700, "Mike" <rubbish@live.com> said:
> On Tue, 12 May 2009 13:49:57 -0700, Savageduck
> <savageduck1{REMOVESPAM}@me.com> wrote:
>
>>>> One idea has occurred to me from this thread, I would like to map the
>>>> places where the greatest change occurs in the shortest mileage. Its
>>>> probably going to be where sea or serious mountains block cultural
>>>> transfer or maybe totalitarian states. Then of course you could look
>>>> at purely landscape change.
>>>
>>> Gaza to Israel.
>>
>> Wouldn't that come under cultural change?
>
> Yes, I don't see how that debars it although it would nice to have
> contenders on other bases.
Debars? Why debar it?
It seems a cross wall, bi-lateral, Gaza-Israel tourist exchange would
provide a great and dynamic cultural experience for all.
Lately the truly dynamic borders are those between Zimbabwe and South Africa.
--
Regards,
Savageduck
== 12 of 23 ==
Date: Wed, May 13 2009 12:56 am
From: "Mike"
On Tue, 12 May 2009 17:06:03 -0500, Ron Hunter <rphunter@charter.net>
wrote:
>Yes, and completely suspect in the sense that there is no sign of any
>illegal use of them, or any need to collect them. Governments that seek
>to do that are highly suspect by anyone who values his freedom.
the association of gun freedom with political freedom is a very
American notion based on their conception of their history. The
important things are to make sure your officer corps and police are
trained to have allegiance to other than a political figure and have
strong separation of judiciary, politics and media.
If Italy were to fall into a dictatorship under barleycorn it would be
because he owns the press and manipulates the judiciary, not because
ordinary citizens don't have pop guns in their lofts.
--
Mike
== 13 of 23 ==
Date: Wed, May 13 2009 1:04 am
From: Savageduck
On 2009-05-13 00:44:02 -0700, "Mike" <rubbish@live.com> said:
> On Tue, 12 May 2009 11:15:34 -0700, Savageduck
> <savageduck1{REMOVESPAM}@me.com> wrote:
>
>>>> Strange, you guys don't sound Mexican :-)
>>>
>>> Lost me on that one...
>>
>> OK.
>> It might be in bad taste, but it was meant to refer to one of those
>> humorous racial stereotype interactions when dealing with mythical male
>> endowment with regard to certain ethnicities.
>
> we would need to travel outside our culture to somewhere that did anti
> Mexican jokes to understand it.......
So when can we expect a postcard from San Diego?
-- Regards,
Savageduck
== 14 of 23 ==
Date: Wed, May 13 2009 1:05 am
From: "Mike"
On Tue, 12 May 2009 17:12:32 -0500, Ron Hunter <rphunter@charter.net>
wrote:
>Really? I can think of several easier ways to kill myself, or others.
>Poison or prescription drug overdose, for instance. Guns are SO messy,
>make a lot of noise, and tend to send bullets places you didn't intend
>them to go.
>It's really pretty easy to kill someone with a butcher knife, of course
>you have to get close to them.
poison is difficult to apply in street crime, knives are up close
only. Why do you think armies choose guns over those things?
--
Mike
== 15 of 23 ==
Date: Wed, May 13 2009 1:06 am
From: "Mike"
On Tue, 12 May 2009 16:48:59 -0700, Savageduck
<savageduck1{REMOVESPAM}@me.com> wrote:
> However our Middle Eastern bretheren have developed a
>pretty surefire method, if only they would keep it personal and not try
>to share the experience.
they are so generous, however its spread beyond the middle east, the
tamils for instance.
--
Mike
== 16 of 23 ==
Date: Wed, May 13 2009 1:14 am
From: "Mike"
On Tue, 12 May 2009 17:18:18 -0500, Ron Hunter <rphunter@charter.net>
wrote:
>In a practical sense, a country practices socialism when it takes money
>from someone via taxes, and gives it to someone else who didn't earn it.
> Under than definition, both the US, and UK are socialist countries.
its a false definition only found in the US. Redistributive taxation
is a way of producing a fairer society. If you think the rich always
deserve to keep all their money have a look at banking.
socialism
a political and economic theory of social organization which advocates
that the means of production, distribution, and exchange should be
owned or regulated by the community as a whole.
In Marxism a transitional social state between the overthrow of
capitalism and the realization of Communism.
Communism
a theory or system of social organization in which all property is
vested in the community and each person contributes and receives
according to their ability and needs.
People outside of the US know all this.
--
Mike
== 17 of 23 ==
Date: Wed, May 13 2009 1:20 am
From: "Mike"
On Wed, 13 May 2009 08:05:54 +0200, Wolfgang Schwanke <see@sig.nature>
wrote:
>Here are two "European" definitions of socialism:
Europe often practices social democracy
social democracy
"A form of society in which democratic political methods are used to
create greater social equality through the redistribution of
resources. At the beginning of the 20th century, social democracy was
virtually synonymous with socialism. After the break with communism in
the 1920s, however, social democratic parties were distinguished by
their commitment to parliamentary democracy and their moderate
programmes of social change. They gradually abandoned their commitment
to public ownership of industry (see nationalization), seeking instead
to make capitalist economies work in a fairer way by implementing
equality of opportunity and by using progressive taxation to provide
social security and welfare programmes for the poorer members of
society. Most Western societies since World War II have adopted social
democratic policies to some degree, with the Scandinavian countries
going furthest in this direction."
If anybody still thinks americans dont need to travel more outside US,
they will never understand.
--
Mike
== 18 of 23 ==
Date: Wed, May 13 2009 1:23 am
From: "Mike"
On Tue, 12 May 2009 17:00:51 -0500, Ron Hunter <rphunter@charter.net>
wrote:
>Only last week, just a few miles from here a 17 year old got mad at a
>guy over a girl, and went over, and bashed down his front door, then
>approached the guy with a baseball bat. Bang, he's dead. No charges
>filed against the shooter.
>THAT'S why we guard that right.
and how often does the home owners gun get taken from him and used
against him and how often does the criminal come ready to shoot first
because the home owner has a gun, US gun ownership does not stop an
historically high murder rate. But I've had this debate before with US
gun nuts and logic always seems beyond them.
--
Mike
== 19 of 23 ==
Date: Wed, May 13 2009 1:28 am
From: "Mike"
On Tue, 12 May 2009 23:29:26 -0400, tony cooper
<tony_cooper213@earthlink.net> wrote:
>>Everything. If we were now sitting in a bar I would be interested that
>>you couldn't recall your president,
>
>We can. We can recall a President through the impeachment process.
I thought that and would have been interested in discussing that too
>>as you might be interested that
>>gun control (in the sense of reducing it) is a dead issue here. We
>>could also discuss how the idea Americans sometimes have that the
>>royals play some part in politics is wrong (although you can make a
>>small case the other way), but a Spaniard might chip in that the royal
>>family there saved democracy and "even the communists are royalists
>>now".
>>
>>Tourism isn't just looking at the sights, its finding the differences.
>
>That's not the way I do "tourist". While I may be wrong, I think I've
>spent more time in your country as a tourist than you have in mine. I
>have never initiated a political discussion in a pub. The few times
>I've been brought into one by someone approaching me on a political
>issue, I've restricted myself to doing the best I could to clear up
>misconceptions without presenting my personal opinions.
>
>I'm pretty well informed on your culture, but it doesn't come from
>arguing with someone in a pub when I'm on holiday.
It doesn't have to be an argument. Yes, you can learn by proxy, but
anything you know about British attitudes has to ultimately come from
speaking to British people, a pub is one of the places.
--
Mike
== 20 of 23 ==
Date: Wed, May 13 2009 1:22 am
From: Chris H
In message <o00l0555qolnhmaq41kk6mlpc5aagb48rm@4ax.com>, Mike
<rubbish@live.com> writes
>On Tue, 12 May 2009 17:18:18 -0500, Ron Hunter <rphunter@charter.net>
>wrote:
>
>>In a practical sense, a country practices socialism when it takes money
>>from someone via taxes, and gives it to someone else who didn't earn it.
>> Under than definition, both the US, and UK are socialist countries.
>
>its a false definition only found in the US. Redistributive taxation
>is a way of producing a fairer society. If you think the rich always
>deserve to keep all their money have a look at banking.
>
>socialism
>a political and economic theory of social organization which advocates
>that the means of production, distribution, and exchange should be
>owned or regulated by the community as a whole.
>
>In Marxism a transitional social state between the overthrow of
>capitalism and the realization of Communism.
>
>Communism
>a theory or system of social organization in which all property is
>vested in the community and each person contributes and receives
>according to their ability and needs.
>
>People outside of the US know all this.
Its because they don't travel out side the US.....
(here we go again :-)
--
\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\
\/\/\/\/\ Chris Hills Staffs England /\/\/\/\/
\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/
== 21 of 23 ==
Date: Wed, May 13 2009 1:24 am
From: Chris H
In message <N9Kdncsw7ovM65fXnZ2dnUVZ_hdi4p2d@giganews.com>, Ron Hunter
<rphunter@charter.net> writes
>
>So, it's ok to come home from a war and blow away your family,
No it is not. That is a mental illness but understandable given
circumstances.
> but keeping a handgun in order to protect your family, and property
>from criminals is a bad thing,
Yes.
Private guns were never held in the UK for the reason above.
--
\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\
\/\/\/\/\ Chris Hills Staffs England /\/\/\/\/
\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/
== 22 of 23 ==
Date: Wed, May 13 2009 1:21 am
From: Chris H
In message <11vk05dor4iecs77dl2kepm5ejbaae1jfr@4ax.com>, Mike
<rubbish@live.com> writes
>On Tue, 12 May 2009 17:06:03 -0500, Ron Hunter <rphunter@charter.net>
>wrote:
>
>>Yes, and completely suspect in the sense that there is no sign of any
>>illegal use of them, or any need to collect them. Governments that seek
>>to do that are highly suspect by anyone who values his freedom.
>
>the association of gun freedom with political freedom is a very
>American notion based on their conception of their history. The
>important things are to make sure your officer corps and police are
>trained to have allegiance to other than a political figure and have
>strong separation of judiciary, politics and media.
>
>If Italy were to fall into a dictatorship under barleycorn it would be
>because he owns the press and manipulates the judiciary, not because
>ordinary citizens don't have pop guns in their lofts.
I agree BUT usually the first sign of a democracy going bad is the
removal of any means of the people being able to stop the process.
Freedoms are reduced and one of these is usually the removal of weapons
from the population. Though to be honest it is more the insecurity of
the politicians than any real chance of armed insurrection. Because if
it does get that far the population will find weapons anyway...
usually the military (all of them or some of them). Turkey is a good
example of this.
On the other hand the US gun culture is very different to most others I
have come across. Certainly very different to the UK
--
\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\
\/\/\/\/\ Chris Hills Staffs England /\/\/\/\/
\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/
== 23 of 23 ==
Date: Wed, May 13 2009 1:31 am
From: "Mike"
On Tue, 12 May 2009 16:47:32 -0500, Ron Hunter <rphunter@charter.net>
wrote:
>> I'm not confused, I'm asking a question about an American using a
>> words that's much more common here.
>
>The thing is that 'Americans' come from so many diverse places, and
>often bring their expressions, and vocabulary with them. When Americans
>hear a word they like, they may embrace it with glee, and use it often.
> It is how the American version of English evolves.
ROFL, that's how *English* evolved for gods sake, only Americans think
they are specially diverse or did something special with English while
everything in this thread proves in many areas there is an American
non diverse view of the world.
--
Mike
==============================================================================
TOPIC: Why EVFs will replace reflex systems
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.photo.digital/t/ddb39c7b20935920?hl=en
==============================================================================
== 1 of 1 ==
Date: Wed, May 13 2009 12:05 am
From: "David J Taylor"
Alfred Molon wrote:
> In article <BcjOl.27985$OO7.5904@text.news.virginmedia.com>, David J
> Taylor says...
>
>> On a "good" day I can shoot well more than the 250 shots of the
>> Kodak, perhaps 500-600 if I'm at a race. I would /have/ to charge
>> and take a spare battery, probably two. This agrees with my
>> experience when using EVF cameras.
>
> Maybe you, but the overwhelming majority of people do not shoot
> hundreds of photos per day.
So different people have different requirements, meaning that blanket
statements such as "Battery life is no problem with LCD/EVF cameras" are
inaccurate, in that they may, or may not, apply to you.
Cheers,
David
==============================================================================
TOPIC: Spanking For A Good Cause
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.photo.digital/t/213486fd88e75dfb?hl=en
==============================================================================
== 1 of 1 ==
Date: Wed, May 13 2009 12:27 am
From: "Hari Seldon"
"Al Bar" <usenet@oaktowncrack.com> schreef in bericht
news:1tqdnT6Ke70yZpTXnZ2dnUVZ_jFi4p2d@giganews.com...
> George Kerby wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 5/12/09 1:33 PM, in article
>> Qt6dnYE145WUXJTXnZ2dnUVZ_jNi4p2d@giganews.com, "Al Bar"
>> <usenet@oaktowncrack.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Amanda's Dad died of AIDS, and to celebrate his birthday she raised
>>> money for AIDS Walk NY with a spanking party:
>>>
>>> http://www.flickr.com/photos/mesolimbo/sets/72157617957563539/
>>
>> Looks like they are carrying on the tradition that caused the man's
>> demise.
>>
>> R.I.P.
>>
>
> Spanking and unprotected sex are two different things ;)
What about unprotected spanking
==============================================================================
TOPIC: New Mandate: Filters!
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.photo.digital/t/6ca44008ad5d3083?hl=en
==============================================================================
== 1 of 1 ==
Date: Wed, May 13 2009 1:21 am
From: Paul Furman
Bertram Paul wrote:
> "Dudley Hanks" <dhanks@blind-apertures.ca> wrote in message
> news:DenOl.26630$Db2.15214@edtnps83...
>> "Troy Piggins" <usenet-0905@piggo.com> wrote in message
>> news:20090513084902@usenet.piggo.com...
>>> * Bowser wrote :
>>>> "Dudley Hanks" <dhanks@telus.net> wrote in message
>>>> news:MLmOl.26624$Db2.21342@edtnps83...
>>>> [---=| Quote block shrinked by t-prot: 15 lines snipped |=---]
>>>>>> filter. Trouble is, aside from the polarizer, I can't remember where I
>>>>>> put the damned things.
>>>>>
>>>>> If a guy uses a UV filter, just about anything goes ... :)
>>>> Sigh...
>>> Sounds like you need to use a coffee filter :)
>>>
>>> --
>>> Troy Piggins
>> I was thinking about using a soft focus filter, but nobody'll be able to
>> tell it from my usual ... :)
>>
>> Take Care,
>> Dudley
>
>
> I'll make one with a fuel filter, one with an oil filter and one with an air
> filter.
> After that one with a water filter and another with a spam filter.
> Of course I'll be smoking a sigarette with a cigarette filter while shooting
> ;-)
Open season for filter puns!
:-)
==============================================================================
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "rec.photo.digital"
group.
To post to this group, visit http://groups.google.com/group/rec.photo.digital?hl=en
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rec.photo.digital+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
To change the way you get mail from this group, visit:
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.photo.digital/subscribe?hl=en
To report abuse, send email explaining the problem to abuse@googlegroups.com
==============================================================================
Google Groups: http://groups.google.com/?hl=en
0 comments:
Post a Comment