Photoshop How To Use: rec.photo.digital - 25 new messages in 14 topics

rec.photo.digital
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.photo.digital?hl=en

rec.photo.digital@googlegroups.com

Today's topics:

==============================================================================
TOPIC: Wish I'd said this...about a hundred times already
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.photo.digital/t/fd0d9f3a64f5d251?hl=en
==============================================================================

== 1 of 1 ==
Date: Sun, Mar 15 2009 10:18 pm
From: Paul Furman

Chris Malcolm wrote:
> In rec.photo.digital.slr-systems Jeremy Nixon <~$!~( )@( )u.defocus.net> wrote:
>> J?rgen Exner <jurgenex@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>>> Don't tell my Nikon D80, doesn't know that it doesn't have a shutter
>>> speed dial.
>
>> What I find most sad is that people seem to have forgotten what a shutter
>> speed dial *is*.
>
> How do you feel about these new fangled electric keyboard thingies you
> have to type on when writing to the newsgroup? Not quite the same as
> the real old thing, are they?

The "carriage return" key is anticlimactic :-)

==============================================================================
TOPIC: Rechargable batteries
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.photo.digital/t/0b45617abfbf5918?hl=en
==============================================================================

== 1 of 2 ==
Date: Mon, Mar 16 2009 1:28 am
From: Martin Brown <|||newspam|||@nezumi.demon.co.uk>

Stormin Mormon wrote:
> Usually what happens is there is one weak cell develops in a
> set of 4.
> That weak cell gradually gets hammered by the others forcing
> current
> through it after it has become exhausted. The weak get
> weaker until they
> compromise a set containing 3 good cells after just a few
> minutes.
>
> CY: Yes, and the combined voltage drops off, to the voltage
> of three cells.
[snip]
>
> It is annoying trying to find the bad cell(s) in multiple
> sets of four
> without a voltmeter or a tester to hand.
>
> CY: I do have both voltmeter, and tester. I am also
> wondering. I changed chargers, a couple weeks ago. I'd been
> using a Sanyo wall charger, and switched to a Battery
> Manager Ultra. I read years ago, on the web, that the BMU
> doesn't charge, completely. I am going back to the Sanyo for
> a while. And will also someday do the test with the
> batteries in series.

Why did you buy a Battery Manager Ultra if you believed from the
reviewers that it was defective? Caveat emptor applies!

Retiring the bad cell out of each set extends the life of the remaining
ones. Otherwise they last no time at all under load.

Regards,
Martin Brown

== 2 of 2 ==
Date: Mon, Mar 16 2009 7:25 am
From: "Neil Harrington"

GMAN wrote:
> In article <47ydnUTmkvct_SDUnZ2dnUVZ_ofinZ2d@giganews.com>, "Neil
> Harrington" <not@home.today> wrote:
>> George Kerby wrote:
>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>> Thanks for the information. I may be buying the BC-700 because of
>>> the reduced price that you mentioned.
>>
>> You're welcome. I just ordered one last night.
>>
>>
> For a little more you should have got the better equipped BC900
>
> http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B00077AA5Q/ref=cm_cr_asin_lnk

I've already got two of the BC-900s. I love 'em. They do come with extra
goodies, some of which however are of doubtful value. Four NiMH AAs (useful)
and four AAAs (possibly useful), a case (mostly useless), and a set of C and
D cell adapters (pretty useless). So the extra rechargeables are good, but
I've got plenty of those. Other than that, the only thing the BC-900 has
over the -700 is the 1000mA charge rating, and I never use that anyway.

==============================================================================
TOPIC: AC chargers
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.photo.digital/t/93fdc2521f559b28?hl=en
==============================================================================

== 1 of 1 ==
Date: Mon, Mar 16 2009 2:05 am
From: Bob Larter

tnom@mucks.net wrote:
> On Sun, 15 Mar 2009 08:19:02 -0700, Miles
> <mileschap@REMOVEMEpacbell.net> wrote:
>
>> I have 2 chargers for my Nokia phone: One is a Nokia that charges 500
>> mA and the other is a BS that charges at 800 mA. FYI, the batteries
>> being charged are Samya BL-4C which is rated at 550mAh and a Nokia BL-4C
>> which doesn't provide the info, however I have another old Nokia charger
>> (European style plug) that reads 800mAh.
>>
>> Presumably the BS charging rate is slower. Difference in battery wear
>> and tear? Is there any harm in using a higher mAh rate, and if so, up
>> to what rate?
>>
>> Miles
>
> The Nokia BL-4C is a 720mah battery. You can use either charger.
> The battery being charged will only take the current it needs as the
> voltage between the two chargers is the same.

Um, no, it doesn't work like that. Chargers wind up the terminal voltage
to whatever it takes to generate the rated charging current. The 800mA
charger will be faster (& hotter) than the 550mA unit.

To the OP: No, there shouldn't be any problem with using the 800mA charger.

--
W
. | ,. w , "Some people are alive only because
\|/ \|/ it is illegal to kill them." Perna condita delenda est
---^----^---------------------------------------------------------------

==============================================================================
TOPIC: Lithium AA's in Panasonic DMC-LS80EB-S
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.photo.digital/t/c9fd8ad27c2c3e94?hl=en
==============================================================================

== 1 of 4 ==
Date: Mon, Mar 16 2009 4:14 am
From: Photo Mad

The Panasonic manual states you cannot use Lithium AA's in the
Panasonic DMC-LS80EB-S digital camera

It allows you to use nimh/ alkaline, or Oxyride (Panasonic own
brand !!) in a menu setting.

I think this is just so that the battery capacity remaining indication
is correct, as type is selected.

I do not see why you cannot use lithium, with their slightly higher
voltage, and greatly increased capacity.

I personally found Oxyrides in another camera not much better than
ordinary alkalines.

Anyone any experience of this ?

== 2 of 4 ==
Date: Mon, Mar 16 2009 7:58 am
From: ASAAR

On Mon, 16 Mar 2009 04:14:35 -0700 (PDT), Photo Mad wrote:

> I do not see why you cannot use lithium, with their slightly higher
> voltage, and greatly increased capacity.
>
> I personally found Oxyrides in another camera not much better than
> ordinary alkalines.

When fresh, oxyrides provide about the same voltage as lithiums.
When using them, lithiums generate more heat. If you shoot rapidly,
especially if the flash is used, the heat may damage your camera.

== 3 of 4 ==
Date: Mon, Mar 16 2009 11:55 am
From: tnom@mucks.net

On Mon, 16 Mar 2009 04:14:35 -0700 (PDT), Photo Mad
<DOITM60@googlemail.com> wrote:

>The Panasonic manual states you cannot use Lithium AA's in the
>Panasonic DMC-LS80EB-S digital camera
>
>It allows you to use nimh/ alkaline, or Oxyride (Panasonic own
>brand !!) in a menu setting.
>
>I think this is just so that the battery capacity remaining indication
>is correct, as type is selected.
>
>I do not see why you cannot use lithium, with their slightly higher
>voltage, and greatly increased capacity.
>
>I personally found Oxyrides in another camera not much better than
>ordinary alkalines.
>
>Anyone any experience of this ?

Lithium AA's are not recommended because they can leak and/or
release highly corrosive lithium hydroxide gas that will quickly
destroy a digital camera.

== 4 of 4 ==
Date: Mon, Mar 16 2009 1:20 pm
From: tnom@mucks.net

On Mon, 16 Mar 2009 10:58:56 -0400, ASAAR <caught@22.com> wrote:

>On Mon, 16 Mar 2009 04:14:35 -0700 (PDT), Photo Mad wrote:
>
>> I do not see why you cannot use lithium, with their slightly higher
>> voltage, and greatly increased capacity.
>>
>> I personally found Oxyrides in another camera not much better than
>> ordinary alkalines.
>
>
> When fresh, oxyrides provide about the same voltage as lithiums.
>When using them, lithiums generate more heat. If you shoot rapidly,
>especially if the flash is used, the heat may damage your camera.

In addition to heat generation, the possibility of corrosive leaking
and/or corrosive venting of gases there is another more likely
factor that keeps camera manufacturers from recommending
lithium AA's.

Lithium AA's have a PTC over current safety device built in.
The (positive temperature coefficient) safety device is used to
turn the battery off when its temperature gets above 185 degrees
Fahrenheit. This disruption of power can cause the camera to
shut down or cause data corruption. The temperature itself,185 will
most likely not harm the camera, but the power interruption may.

Using side by side lithium's can further increase the likely hood of
more heat generation. The fact that lithium AA's are less dense
than alkaline or NIMH further increases their chance of getting hot
because they have lesser ability to absorb the heat.

http://data.energizer.com/PDFs/lithiuml91l92_appman.pdf

==============================================================================
TOPIC: Brainstorm session for commercial photographers
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.photo.digital/t/d069aa1e06a38f65?hl=en
==============================================================================

== 1 of 1 ==
Date: Mon, Mar 16 2009 6:29 am
From: "Focus"

Most of the photographers here are far away from each other, geographical (I
live in Portugal, for example) so we won't "bite" each other by sharing some
idea's. I was thinking how to extend my / our business(es).
One thing I came up with, is to make a small studio / booth at my local
shopping mall and make free pictures. After all, it doesn't cost that much
to make and print pictures. After people have their picture taken, they can
come back another day to pick up the photo. I was thinking of giving my
business card to them, along with the picture, but maybe it's better to make
a watermark in the picture with my business card.
As an option, I (you) could offer to make more picture at a reasonable
price, without the watermark ;-)

Now there's the practical side of the whole thing and the challenges coming
with it:

1. how do you make sure you have the right photo number and give it to the
people, so thay can pick up the photo easily?

2. I was thinking of making the pictures with the computer attached (remote
controlled), so you can already have control over the name of the file. But
this seems unpractical, because if you need to make more pictures for one
person, you want to hold the camera in your hands. I don't think (but I'm
not sure) that you can transfer the photo's automatically thru a USB cable
(Nikon CCP in my case).

3. how and with what software can you make an extended watermark, with your
name and phone number, for example? PS comes to mind, but I never used that
feature. Batch seems logical.

4. because the printed photo's have no information and you're probably
dealing with a lot (I expect a few hundred) of people, how do you set up an
easy system, to retrieve the photo for each person?

5. anybody have different idea's or aditions, welcome!

--
---
Focus

==============================================================================
TOPIC: Taking The D3x Into The Valley Of Darkness To Tame The Beast!!
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.photo.digital/t/145e223d07f40589?hl=en
==============================================================================

== 1 of 1 ==
Date: Mon, Mar 16 2009 6:32 am
From: "bowzer"

"Larry Thong" <larry_thong@shitstring.com> wrote in message
news:_oWdnaywm41XBiDUnZ2dnUVZ_vWdnZ2d@supernews.com...
> bowser wrote:
>
>>> Considering the model train display is an exact reproduction of the
>>> 13 mile
>>> stretch from historic Ellicott City to Baltimore depicting the B&O
>>> Railroad
>>> line of yesteryear it is very impressive.
>>
>> Yeah, too bad the picture sucked. Damn shame.
>
> LOL! Coming from you I'll take that as a compliment. I'm so glad you
> liked
> it.

Take it however you like, Rita, you haven't changed. Still the same low-rent
troll.

==============================================================================
TOPIC: What kind of hawk is this?
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.photo.digital/t/f42575f01a723312?hl=en
==============================================================================

== 1 of 4 ==
Date: Mon, Mar 16 2009 6:34 am
From: JoelH

> >> Can someone tell me what kind of hawk this is:
>
> >>http://www.flickr.com/photos/joelmhoffman/3349387656/
>
> > I say its a red tail, I have coopers and redtail out my window and in
> > my yard trying to catch all the squirrels I fed all winter. The
> > Coopers are all grey and lighter and that one looks big, like a
> > redtail.
>
> That is a Cooper's Hawk, the 3 tail chevrons with the last one broader
> and darker is diagnostic.

It looks like hawks enjoy a wide variety of colorings. I found this
picture:

http://content.ornith.cornell.edu/UEWebApp/images/VIR_020403_100003_L.jpg

http://www.birds.cornell.edu/AllAboutBirds/BirdGuide/Red-tailed_Hawk_dtl.html

and to my eye they look a lot like mine:

http://www.flickr.com/photos/joelmhoffman/3349387656/

But the color pattern on the birds' chests is different.

I count four color stripes on the tail, not three.

-Joel

== 2 of 4 ==
Date: Mon, Mar 16 2009 8:02 am
From: Allen

Savageduck wrote:
> On 2009-03-15 16:03:01 -0700, ransley <Mark_Ransley@Yahoo.com> said:
>
>> On Mar 15, 3:24 pm, JoelH <JoelAtExc...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Can someone tell me what kind of hawk this is:
>>>
>>> http://www.flickr.com/photos/joelmhoffman/3349387656/
>>>
>>> Is it even a hawk?
>>>
>>> Thanks.
>>>
>>> -Joel
>> I say its a red tail, I have coopers and redtail out my window and in
>> my yard trying to catch all the squirrels I fed all winter. The
>> Coopers are all grey and lighter and that one looks big, like a
>> redtail.
>
> That is a Cooper's Hawk, the 3 tail chevrons with the last one broader
> and darker is diagnostic.
> This is much smaller than even a light morph Red Tail.
> If you were going to mistake it for anything else a possibility might be
> a Sharp Shinned Hawk, but it is smaller and there are 4 tail chevrons
> evenly colored, so Cooper's it is.
And its tail isn't red.
Allen

== 3 of 4 ==
Date: Mon, Mar 16 2009 8:04 am
From: JoelH

> >>> Can someone tell me what kind of hawk this is:
>
> >>>http://www.flickr.com/photos/joelmhoffman/3349387656/
>
> > That is a Cooper's Hawk, the 3 tail chevrons with the last one broader
> > and darker is diagnostic.
> > This is much smaller than even a light morph Red Tail.
> > If you were going to mistake it for anything else a possibility might be
> > a Sharp Shinned Hawk, but it is smaller and there are 4 tail chevrons
> > evenly colored, so Cooper's it is.
>
> And its tail isn't red.

Isn't the red part of the tail on the other side?

-Joel

== 4 of 4 ==
Date: Mon, Mar 16 2009 8:34 am
From: Savageduck

On 2009-03-16 08:02:59 -0700, Allen <allent@austin.rr.com> said:

> Savageduck wrote:
>> On 2009-03-15 16:03:01 -0700, ransley <Mark_Ransley@Yahoo.com> said:
>>
>>> On Mar 15, 3:24 pm, JoelH <JoelAtExc...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> Can someone tell me what kind of hawk this is:
>>>>
>>>> http://www.flickr.com/photos/joelmhoffman/3349387656/
>>>>
>>>> Is it even a hawk?
>>>>
>>>> Thanks.
>>>>
>>>> -Joel
>>> I say its a red tail, I have coopers and redtail out my window and in
>>> my yard trying to catch all the squirrels I fed all winter. The
>>> Coopers are all grey and lighter and that one looks big, like a
>>> redtail.
>>
>> That is a Cooper's Hawk, the 3 tail chevrons with the last one broader
>> and darker is diagnostic.
>> This is much smaller than even a light morph Red Tail.
>> If you were going to mistake it for anything else a possibility might
>> be a Sharp Shinned Hawk, but it is smaller and there are 4 tail
>> chevrons evenly colored, so Cooper's it is.
> And its tail isn't red.

Light morph RedTail Hawks can have light grey to light reddish brown
tails with light contrasting stripes. The mature dark morphs will have
the obvious "red" tail.

--
Regards,
Savageduck

==============================================================================
TOPIC: New Mandate: Close Up, Due April 5th, 2009
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.photo.digital/t/c790ca3f5e430bef?hl=en
==============================================================================

== 1 of 1 ==
Date: Mon, Mar 16 2009 6:33 am
From: "bowzer"

"Atheist Chaplain" <abused@cia.gov> wrote in message
news:49bdbe5b@news.x-privat.org...
> "bowser" <wh@tisgoing.on> wrote in message
> news:49bd8cee$0$14631$ec3e2dad@news.usenetmonster.com...
>>
>> "Atheist Chaplain" <abused@cia.gov> wrote in message
>> news:49bcd991@news.x-privat.org...
>>> "bowser" <wh@tisgoing.on> wrote in message
>>> news:49bbcb49$0$8344$ec3e2dad@news.usenetmonster.com...
>>>>
>>>> "Atheist Chaplain" <abused@cia.gov> wrote in message
>>>> news:49bb9be8@news.x-privat.org...
>>>>> "bowser" <wh@tisgoing.on> wrote in message
>>>>> news:49b998cf$0$2784$ec3e2dad@news.usenetmonster.com...
>>>>>> After the monthly board meeting, the Shoot-In Advisory Board
>>>>>> Committee Team Group has chosen Close Up as this month's photographic
>>>>>> mandate. However, this mandate has been Bowzerized, as usual. Here's
>>>>>> the idea: grab a lens, any lens, and shoot something at that lens'
>>>>>> closet possible focus point; OR submit a killer macro/micro shot
>>>>>> using some dedicated macro/micro lens. This gives those of you who do
>>>>>> not own a macro lens a chance to submit, and those of you who have
>>>>>> spent for that MP-E to show us what you can do with it. There were
>>>>>> other mandates considered, but rejected by the Board:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Man Date: great idea, but it gave Brett a huge advantage. No fair for
>>>>>> the rest of us.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Self-Portrait: maybe next month, but it's been done as Rogue's
>>>>>> Gallery, and besides that, nobody deserves to be subjected to my
>>>>>> face. Nobody.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It's all here:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> http://www.pbase.com/shootin
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This mandate, Close Up, is due April 5th, 2009. Please submit your
>>>>>> photos by 6PM, Eastern Daylight Time.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Fire!
>>>>>
>>>>> but does it have to be of your face ??
>>>>
>>>> No, but the alternatives are much, much worse...
>>>
>>> how bad can the back of your head be ??
>>
>> Well, it is a lot better than the front, no question. But that wouldn't
>> work, would it?
>>
>> OK, how about "self-portrait" for the next mandate? I'll be gentle.
>
> I would still be easily recognizable as I have a head like a smashed
> cabbage LOL
> and there are ways of putting yourself in a portrait without being
> recognizable ;-)
>
> This could be a real challenge, after all once it gets bowserised with
> little caveats and conditions who knows what the results might be like :-)
> and you have a whole month to formulate a set of cunning rules ;-)

How about a self portrait with no faces? You'd need to find some other way
to show who you are. Workable?

==============================================================================
TOPIC: Profiles
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.photo.digital/t/a7788eb9dc84c9a8?hl=en
==============================================================================

== 1 of 3 ==
Date: Mon, Mar 16 2009 7:33 am
From: "Gordo"

I am looking for a profile for a Canon S900 printer and Kirkland
Professional Glossy Inkjet Photo Paper.

Is there one available? If so, where could I obtain it?

Many thanks,

Gordo

== 2 of 3 ==
Date: Mon, Mar 16 2009 7:59 am
From: Allen

Gordo wrote:
> I am looking for a profile for a Canon S900 printer and Kirkland
> Professional Glossy Inkjet Photo Paper.
>
> Is there one available? If so, where could I obtain it?
>
> Many thanks,
>
> Gordo
>
>
I think you will need to find who makes the paper for Kirkland (a Costco
brand for those who aren't familiar with it) and work from there. At
onetime, as I recall, Ilford made some of their paper at one time, but
it might be from somewhere else now.
Allen

== 3 of 3 ==
Date: Mon, Mar 16 2009 12:41 pm
From: "pupick"

Generally start with the most closely matched profile that comes with your
printer.
In this case it would probably be Canon Photo Paper Plus Glossy.
Be sure you understand Canon's procedures for color managed printing in
Photoshop.
If you are not satisfied with the results compared to using Canon's own
paper, and do not want to pay for a custom profile (which would be sort of
nuts for using Costco brand paper) then try to analyze what you think is off
about the Kirkland paper print.
You can create a test strip with adjustments to brightness (the most common
issue) or color (far more difficult to do by eyeballing) and save whatever
works for you as an action that you can apply just prior to printing.
Most modern consumer higher grade glossy papers tend to print similarly in
my experience using the canned profile for the printer manufacturer's
comparable paper stock.

==============================================================================
TOPIC: Coogi,BAPE and BBC Apparels - discount
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.photo.digital/t/14269227f5521582?hl=en
==============================================================================

== 1 of 1 ==
Date: Mon, Mar 16 2009 9:01 am
From: admcepeter@gmail.com

Want to buy cheap and high quality Coogi,BAPE and BBC Apparels,please
view our store (www.luxury-fashion.org)
Our goods are the fine quality.

You can check them here:
http://www.luxury-fashion.org/static/Apparels/Coogi.html
http://www.luxury-fashion.org/static/Apparels/BBC.html
http://www.luxury-fashion.org/static/Apparels/Bape.html

Welcome check our site and feel free contact us.
Believe You can find what do you want here!

==============================================================================
TOPIC: Wetbacks Love The D3x!!
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.photo.digital/t/30f3b592afc750a7?hl=en
==============================================================================

== 1 of 1 ==
Date: Mon, Mar 16 2009 10:45 am
From: George Kerby

On 3/15/09 8:46 PM, in article
19fc7456-8e0b-4bdf-9ce0-11d9a0c669f2@e18g2000yqo.googlegroups.com, "Nicko"
<nervous.nick@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Mar 15, 7:19 pm, "Larry Thong" <larry_th...@shitstring.com> wrote:
>> We all know wetbacks are great with lawns, very cunning, incredible
>> swimmers, and love to migrate to find better opportunities for their family.
>> But who would have thought they would love the D3x so much?
>>
>> <http://i298.photobucket.com/albums/mm261/Ritaberk/Wetback.jpg>
>
> As your Wetback lawyer, I advise you that your posts are annoying as
> hell, although they contain links to some really great photos that
> would do well in speaking for themselves, without any hype via
> nauseating cutesy usenet posts or subject lines.
>
> I further advise you to take your references to specific photographic
> gear, and all of your exclamation marks, and violently cram them up
> your goddamn ugly, diseased, attention-whore ass until you shit blood
> for weeks.
>
> HAND.
>
> --
> YOP...
Why hold back? Why doncha tell him/her how you *really* feel?!?

==============================================================================
TOPIC: Flash for Olympus E-510
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.photo.digital/t/a20d30a996cc196f?hl=en
==============================================================================

== 1 of 2 ==
Date: Mon, Mar 16 2009 11:26 am
From: "Dan"

Does anyone know of a flash that will work with this camera other than the
Olympus or Metz flash? I really don't want to spend that much on a flash
that I won't use that much, but I still would like a decent flash unit. Any
help will be greatly appreciated.

== 2 of 2 ==
Date: Mon, Mar 16 2009 12:24 pm
From: Alfred Molon

In article <BRwvl.495$6%.381@nwrddc01.gnilink.net>, Dan says...
> Does anyone know of a flash that will work with this camera other than the
> Olympus or Metz flash? I really don't want to spend that much on a flash
> that I won't use that much, but I still would like a decent flash unit. Any
> help will be greatly appreciated.

Try asking here:
http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/MyOlympus/
--

Alfred Molon
------------------------
Olympus 50X0, 8080, E3X0, E4X0, E5X0, E620, E30, E3 forum at
http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/MyOlympus/
http://myolympus.org/ photo sharing site

==============================================================================
TOPIC: High pixels, low DPI ??
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.photo.digital/t/46e4c2dfc3c3b69a?hl=en
==============================================================================

== 1 of 1 ==
Date: Mon, Mar 16 2009 12:21 pm
From: Ted Shoemaker

Hello,

Our church is doing a photo directory.

The picture quality of the last directory was about half that of the
pictures that I supplied. That is, the printed pictures look as if
they have the same resolution as my on-screen photos when I view them
at 50%.

In response to this concern, someone (presumably the publisher) wrote
that I should send pictures at 220 DPI.

Well . . . last time they were at 220 dpi, IF a printer's dot is the
same as a screen pixel. That is, a 4-inch-wide photo was 880 pixels
wide. Is this the right way to get 220 dots? If not, what is the
right way? If so, why was the print resolutino about half that of the
screen picture? Should I use a higher resolution?

Thank you for all advice.

Ted Shoemaker

==============================================================================
TOPIC: Beware the Brides of March
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.photo.digital/t/f17645b0d016d152?hl=en
==============================================================================

== 1 of 2 ==
Date: Mon, Mar 16 2009 1:04 pm
From: Al Bar

Dozens of weirdos wearing wedding dresses, wondering drunk in downtown San Francisco:

http://www.flickr.com/photos/mesolimbo/sets/72157615262909521/

== 2 of 2 ==
Date: Mon, Mar 16 2009 1:45 pm
From: D-Mac

Al Bar wrote:
> Dozens of weirdos wearing wedding dresses, wondering drunk in downtown
> San Francisco:
>
> http://www.flickr.com/photos/mesolimbo/sets/72157615262909521/

More like beware the photographers of March judging by those pics!

==============================================================================

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "rec.photo.digital"
group.

To post to this group, visit http://groups.google.com/group/rec.photo.digital?hl=en

To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rec.photo.digital+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com

To change the way you get mail from this group, visit:
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.photo.digital/subscribe?hl=en

To report abuse, send email explaining the problem to abuse@googlegroups.com

==============================================================================
Google Groups: http://groups.google.com/?hl=en

Photoshop How To Use

Categories

Blog Archive

About Me

Monday, March 16, 2009

rec.photo.digital - 25 new messages in 14 topics - digest

0 comments:

Live Traffic