Photoshop How To Use

Thank you so much :D

Tammy.png picture by Little_feather_cherokee

From: Lydia <lydiacabrera@gmail.com>
To: PSP-Snags@googlegroups.com
Sent: Monday, June 15, 2009 12:25:38 PM
Subject: [PSP-Snags] Re: Request for SW 35 & 36

Here you go :)

http://rapidshare.com/files/244499555/SWpack35.zip
http://rapidshare.com/files/244500061/SWpack36.zip

On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 5:59 AM, Tammy Knott <little_feather_is_cherokee@yahoo.com> wrote:

Does anyone have the new SW packs 35 and 36?

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
PSP-Snags Google group: http://groups.google.com/group/PSP-Snags
Send to: psp-snags@googlegroups.com
Uunsubscribe: psp-snags-unsubscribe@googlegroups.com

http://groups.google.com/group/Cartoon-PSP * http://groups.google.com/group/Disney-Tubes * http://groups.google.com/group/PSP-Snags-Adult * http://I-Love-PSP.com * http://PSP.I-Love-Disney.com * http://I-Love-Cartoons.com * http://I-Love-Disney.com * http://KTimothy.com * http://Disney-Stationary.com * http://Disney-Kingdom.com * http://Disney-Clipart.com * http://twitter.com/ktimothy *

This is a private email and is covered by TITLE 18, PART I, CHAPTER 47, Sec. 1030 and Internet Privacy Law. Sharing done, within this group, is for personal use only - NOT FOR PROFIT
NO COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT IS INTENDED.
Group owner is not responsible for the sends/opinions of its members
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

HayalDunyamiz Andy Williams-El Condor Pasa_Iclal

BEGIN:VCARD
VERSION:2.1
N:;***iclal***
FN:***iclal***
EMAIL;PREF;INTERNET:iiclal98@yahoo.ca
REV:20090615T123608Z
END:VCARD

EL CONDOR PASA

I'd rather be a sparrow than a snail
Yes i would, if i could, i surely would
I'd rather be a hammer than a nail
Yes i would, if i only could, i surely would

Away, i'd rather sail away
Like a swan that's here and gone
A man gets tied up to the ground
He gives the world its saddest sound
Its saddest sound

I'd rather be a forest than a street
Yes i would, if i could, i surely would
I'd rather feel the earth beneath my feet
Yes i would, if i only could, i surely would

Andy Williams

İCLAL

TURKiYE / İstanbul
http://groups.google.com/group/hayaldunyamiz/

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
Bizim "Hayaldunyamiz"
Mail gönderme adresimiz:hayaldunyamiz@googlegroups.com
Üye olma adresimiz:hayaldunyamiz-subscribe@googlegroups.com
Üyeliğinizi sonlandırma adresimiz:
hayaldunyamiz-unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

[fnftwo] Marlie

Beautifully written Tut for Winni's Fun Group and I didn't change a thing. Loved the tut as it was.

Dawn

Tut

[PSP-Snags] Re: Misc QP & Cluster frame freebies previews / blog links 3

Much appreciated!
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
PSP-Snags Google group: http://groups.google.com/group/PSP-Snags
Send to: psp-snags@googlegroups.com
Uunsubscribe: psp-snags-unsubscribe@googlegroups.com

it.comp.grafica.photoshop - 6 nuovi messaggi in 5 argomenti - digest

it.comp.grafica.photoshop
http://groups.google.com/group/it.comp.grafica.photoshop?hl=it

it.comp.grafica.photoshop@googlegroups.com

Argomenti odierni:

* OT - Mai visto sulle reti merdaset! - 1 messaggi, 1 autore
http://groups.google.com/group/it.comp.grafica.photoshop/t/c5d39bd3789c80ae?hl=it
* Plug-in effetto "Urlo" di Munch - 1 messaggi, 1 autore
http://groups.google.com/group/it.comp.grafica.photoshop/t/7d638e6529a416a2?hl=it
* Scommetto che questo piace a parecchi ;o) - 2 messaggi, 2 autori
http://groups.google.com/group/it.comp.grafica.photoshop/t/880980d7fbd34034?hl=it
* CS4 VS CS3 una cosa sull'interfaccia. - 1 messaggi, 1 autore
http://groups.google.com/group/it.comp.grafica.photoshop/t/2cda86a69ff784c8?hl=it
* Acquisto licenza Photoshop CS2 a 50euro? possibile? - 1 messaggi, 1 autore
http://groups.google.com/group/it.comp.grafica.photoshop/t/8fdcc25261644e3c?hl=it

==============================================================================
ARGOMENTO: OT - Mai visto sulle reti merdaset!
http://groups.google.com/group/it.comp.grafica.photoshop/t/c5d39bd3789c80ae?hl=it
==============================================================================

== 1 di 1 ==
Data: Sab 13 Giu 2009 08:19
Da: "orpy"

Larsenio wrote:
> Andrea Vanacore ha scritto:
>> http://i42.tinypic.com/33fgx6t.jpg
>
> Bellissimo ^^

la brambilla sembra più la Carlucci ...

==============================================================================
ARGOMENTO: Plug-in effetto "Urlo" di Munch
http://groups.google.com/group/it.comp.grafica.photoshop/t/7d638e6529a416a2?hl=it
==============================================================================

== 1 di 1 ==
Data: Dom 14 Giu 2009 07:59
Da: "gs"

"_merlinO_" <bettyboop.toglimi@studioistanti.it> ha scritto nel messaggio
news:mn.1b287d9673af8826.55598@studioistanti.it...
> http://www.gertrudisgraphics.com/#
>

Grazie. Ora lo provo.

--
Giorgio

==============================================================================
ARGOMENTO: Scommetto che questo piace a parecchi ;o)
http://groups.google.com/group/it.comp.grafica.photoshop/t/880980d7fbd34034?hl=it
==============================================================================

== 1 di 2 ==
Data: Dom 14 Giu 2009 15:20
Da: "acca"

> Questo è più adatto. ;o)
>
> http://i44.tinypic.com/5vun4n.jpg

cosa ne dite di:
magic pitaly?

== 2 di 2 ==
Data: Lun 15 Giu 2009 00:06
Da: "Andrea Vanacore"

acca wrote:
>> Questo è più adatto. ;o)
>>
>> http://i44.tinypic.com/5vun4n.jpg
>
>
> cosa ne dite di:
> magic pitaly?

ROTFL!

==============================================================================
ARGOMENTO: CS4 VS CS3 una cosa sull'interfaccia.
http://groups.google.com/group/it.comp.grafica.photoshop/t/2cda86a69ff784c8?hl=it
==============================================================================

== 1 di 1 ==
Data: Dom 14 Giu 2009 23:18
Da: danirobotti

comunque il tasto destro non mi fa più un bel niente. E'
> una impostazione modificabile? :-/

Ho fatto una ricerca per togliermi la curiosità, e si direbbe che il
tasto destro sia ancora perfettamente utilizzabile su CS4 x PC (io uso
mac e non posso controllare direttamente, comunque da me il Ctrl +
click funziona ancora).

Daniele
www.robotti.it

==============================================================================
ARGOMENTO: Acquisto licenza Photoshop CS2 a 50euro? possibile?
http://groups.google.com/group/it.comp.grafica.photoshop/t/8fdcc25261644e3c?hl=it
==============================================================================

== 1 di 1 ==
Data: Lun 15 Giu 2009 00:04
Da: Briareos Kerensky

On 11 Giu, 22:58, "DigiART ;)" <nu...@fatticazzitua.org> wrote:

> Oppure una licenza vecchia, che ha già usato per upgradare alla CS2 o
> CS4 e vuole rivendersi perchè non sa più cosa farci.. e magari è
> magnanimo e chiede poco.. Non può essere?

Non potrebbe. Se su una nuova macchina installi una qualsiasi licenza
di upgrade la Creative Suite controlla se ci sono versioni presenti
sul computer per validarsi oppure ti chiede il seriale della tua
licenza non-upgrade.
Certo, basta segnarsi il seriale su un foglio di carta, ma missà che
l'Adobe non è stupida e quando attivi il tuo upgrade fanno anche un
controllo sul seriale non-upgrade.

==============================================================================

Hai ricevuto questo messaggio in quanto sei iscritto al gruppo Google Gruppi "it.comp.grafica.photoshop"
gruppo.

Per postare in questo gruppo, visita la pagina http://groups.google.com/group/it.comp.grafica.photoshop?hl=it

Per annullare l'iscrizione a questo gruppo, invia un'email a it.comp.grafica.photoshop+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com

Per modificare il modo con cui ricevi le email da questo gruppo, visita:
http://groups.google.com/group/it.comp.grafica.photoshop/subscribe?hl=it

Per segnalare un illecito, invia un'email spiegando il problema a abuse@
googlegroups.com

==============================================================================
Google Gruppi: http://groups.google.com/?hl=it

alt.graphics.photoshop - 7 new messages in 2 topics - digest

alt.graphics.photoshop
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.graphics.photoshop?hl=en

alt.graphics.photoshop@googlegroups.com

Today's topics:

* Recommendation for a colour printer - 4 messages, 4 authors
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.graphics.photoshop/t/2d52644a5ca5db6a?hl=en
* Sizing after Crop - 3 messages, 3 authors
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.graphics.photoshop/t/b6a6e26ab801b7a5?hl=en

==============================================================================
TOPIC: Recommendation for a colour printer
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.graphics.photoshop/t/2d52644a5ca5db6a?hl=en
==============================================================================

== 1 of 4 ==
Date: Sat, Jun 13 2009 7:40 pm
From: Misifus

Les Desser wrote:
> I have a friend who is an illustrator - does hand drawings, scans them
> in and then does final touching up on Photoshop.
>
> He has asked me for a recommendation for a suitable colour printer that
> will do accurate prints.
>
> Volume is not high - maybe 25 - 50 pages a month.
>
> My gut feel is that he would be best served with an inkjet printer but I
> don't have a clue as to what features to look out for. I presume that
> the ability to calibrate the printer is important. Cost is an issue so
> not too expensive.
>
> Can anyone recommend a suitable printer?
>
> Thanks

Epson R1900

--
Misifus-
Rafael Seibert
Photos: http://www.flickr.com/photos/rafiii
home: http://www.rafandsioux.com

== 2 of 4 ==
Date: Sun, Jun 14 2009 5:35 am
From: High Priest

In article <87u435d7nhk20a4mha043krsegrog0sbcv@4ax.com>,
<mike@nosamm.org> wrote:

> Canon ink jets get the highest consumer ratings. I had an Epson for a
> number of years with no problems.
> Then purchased a deeply discounted Canon (about $50 IP4200) and refilled
> my own cartridges. After about 2 years I was unable to clean the ink
> heads in spite of using 'heroic' measures such as soaking it in hot
> ammonia overnight etc. One MUST use and ink jet every few days or else it
> dries up - permanently!
>
> I had a good supply of ink so I bought two (2) IP3500 that will use the
> same ink and cartridges. (about $55US ea with ink).
>
> Epson is a good brand. I have two dot matrix printers that never died.
> I prefer Canon software. Since the life seems to be that of the print
> head - buy cheap (grin).
>
> m

Woa wait a minute, cowboy.

Les said his friend wants to do "accurate" prints.

> Canon ink jets get the highest consumer ratings.

Yes, Canon gets good ratings from consumers. But I suggest you look at
ratings by professionals. Try the various FLAAR web sites where Epson
is consistently rated best or second best (to HP) depending on the
model and the year of evaluation. More=generically, all three are ok.

> [I] refilled my own cartridges

I urge Les to tell his friend never to do this. Just one reason:

> I was unable to clean the ink heads in spite of using 'heroic' measures

I experimented with refilling when I was just starting out learning
about printers. It was a never-ending nightmare.

Another reason: Les' friend wants accuracy. The inks in a refill system
are cheap because they're shit.

The best way, trouble-free, to get good, consistent, color-predictable,
permanent prints is to use the ink recommended by the printer
manufacturer. In the case of Epson, at least the medium- and high-end
printers I recommended, is Ultrachrome.

By the way, there are two broad categories of ink. Dye-based will give
you impressive colors and a wider gamut than pigment-based inks. But
they will fade in a very short time (sometimes measured in months or
even weeks. Days, if you're in strong sunlight.)

Furthermore,

> One MUST use and ink jet every few days or else it dries up - permanently!

Is simply not true for a good printer using correct inks.

Repeat: stay away from refill systems. Cheap and nasty.

Talker added

> That's why I prefer HP over the Epson...no more clogged heads.

I've been printing high quality giclée prints for over ten years and
mid-quality work for another decade before that. I've never had a
clogged head. Just use the right ink is all.

> The only down side to the HP is that the color cartridge contains
> three colors, so if one color runs out, you have to throw away the
> other two colors in order to change to a new cartridge.

An important consideration that immediately rules HP out of
consideration for me.

Les, here is a rule of thumb you cannot afford to ignore. If your
friend truly wants to produce quality work, he should not consider any
of the dinky little consumer-oriented printers found at the typical
retail store. The Epson 4880 I mentioned in my first post is really the
bottom of the range that he should be looking at. Cheaper models will
give in consistent work, meaning he will waste ink, paper and time
trying to get a "good" print. And the machine will not last as long.
But, if $2,500 is too much for him, at least look at the 3800 nothing
lower.

And, one more time, use good quality paper and the proper inks.

Les, there was apparently much interest in this topic so I and maybe
the other correspondents would be interested to read a postscript. What
did he buy, how did it perform etc.

== 3 of 4 ==
Date: Sun, Jun 14 2009 6:11 am
From: Dave

Misifus wrote:
>
>Epson R1900

No Misfit, wrong..!
Never buy any printer where the printheads are not on the cartridge.

The cost of replacing the heads was nearly what I paid for the Epson
where after I started buying HP, and now I am using Canon.

important note...
When doing Pro Prints, I am making use of a profesional printer
and the printer at home is for day to day work.

== 4 of 4 ==
Date: Sun, Jun 14 2009 7:10 am
From: Sir F. A. Rien

High Priest <HP@snotmail.com> found these unused words:

>> One MUST use and ink jet every few days or else it dries up - permanently!
>
>Is simply not true for a good printer using correct inks.
>
>Repeat: stay away from refill systems. Cheap and nasty.
>
>Talker added
>
>> That's why I prefer HP over the Epson...no more clogged heads.
>
>I've been printing high quality giclée prints for over ten years and
>mid-quality work for another decade before that. I've never had a
>clogged head. Just use the right ink is all.

Might tell that to Lexmark [IBM] Their inkjunks clog constantly!

FWIW, do a -=reference=- print with dye, then have -=real=- prints made on a
Fuji Photo machine!

The cost of the inks and paper just about equals the Fuji and it's far, far,
far better!

==============================================================================
TOPIC: Sizing after Crop
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.graphics.photoshop/t/b6a6e26ab801b7a5?hl=en
==============================================================================

== 1 of 3 ==
Date: Sun, Jun 14 2009 10:00 pm
From: RDOC

I am using Photoshop CS4

I have an image that is an 8''x10'' photo and I want it to remain that
size. It is an image of a turtle which has to much open space around
the turtle so I want to crop it to remove all that open space. Now
when I crop it to remove the open space the size of the photo becomes
smaller.

What is the proper way to now enlarged this cropped image back up to
the 8x10 size without causing any loss of quality in the photo? Thanks
for your help.

== 2 of 3 ==
Date: Sun, Jun 14 2009 10:12 pm
From: tony cooper

On Sun, 14 Jun 2009 22:00:40 -0700 (PDT), RDOC <rdoc2@comcast.net>
wrote:

>I am using Photoshop CS4
>
>I have an image that is an 8''x10'' photo and I want it to remain that
>size. It is an image of a turtle which has to much open space around
>the turtle so I want to crop it to remove all that open space. Now
>when I crop it to remove the open space the size of the photo becomes
>smaller.
>
>What is the proper way to now enlarged this cropped image back up to
>the 8x10 size without causing any loss of quality in the photo? Thanks
>for your help.

If you have an 8" x 10" photo that you want to crop, but you want the
resulting size to be 8" x 10", you set your crop tool to 8" x 10" in
the width and height boxes and the image - less the parts you cropped
out - will still be 8" x 10". The image will not be smaller.

If you did not specify the crop dimensions when applying the crop, the
image will be smaller.

If you have already done this, and not saved a copy of the pre-cropped
image, you can bring it back up to 8" x 10" by resizing the image.
(Provided that you cropped in a 2:5 ratio) There will be some loss of
quality, but it may not be noticeable.

--
Tony Cooper - Orlando, Florida

== 3 of 3 ==
Date: Sun, Jun 14 2009 10:29 pm
From: Rob

tony cooper wrote:
> On Sun, 14 Jun 2009 22:00:40 -0700 (PDT), RDOC <rdoc2@comcast.net>
> wrote:
>
>> I am using Photoshop CS4
>>
>> I have an image that is an 8''x10'' photo and I want it to remain that
>> size. It is an image of a turtle which has to much open space around
>> the turtle so I want to crop it to remove all that open space. Now
>> when I crop it to remove the open space the size of the photo becomes
>> smaller.
>>
>> What is the proper way to now enlarged this cropped image back up to
>> the 8x10 size without causing any loss of quality in the photo? Thanks
>> for your help.
>
> If you have an 8" x 10" photo that you want to crop, but you want the
> resulting size to be 8" x 10", you set your crop tool to 8" x 10" in
> the width and height boxes and the image - less the parts you cropped
> out - will still be 8" x 10". The image will not be smaller.
>
> If you did not specify the crop dimensions when applying the crop, the
> image will be smaller.
>
> If you have already done this, and not saved a copy of the pre-cropped
> image, you can bring it back up to 8" x 10" by resizing the image.
> (Provided that you cropped in a 2:5 ratio) There will be some loss of
> quality, but it may not be noticeable.
>
>
>
>
>
>
btw you should specify the resolution in the box aswell

==============================================================================

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "alt.graphics.photoshop"
group.

To post to this group, visit http://groups.google.com/group/alt.graphics.photoshop?hl=en

To unsubscribe from this group, send email to alt.graphics.photoshop+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com

To change the way you get mail from this group, visit:
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.graphics.photoshop/subscribe?hl=en

To report abuse, send email explaining the problem to abuse@googlegroups.com

==============================================================================
Google Groups: http://groups.google.com/?hl=en

adobe.photoshop.windows - 1 new message in 1 topic - digest

adobe.photoshop.windows
http://groups.google.com/group/adobe.photoshop.windows?hl=en

adobe.photoshop.windows@googlegroups.com

Today's topics:

* How do I insert metadata in TIFF files? Can this be done inside Photoshop? -
1 messages, 1 author
http://groups.google.com/group/adobe.photoshop.windows/t/dd532575c7869908?hl=en

==============================================================================
TOPIC: How do I insert metadata in TIFF files? Can this be done inside
Photoshop?
http://groups.google.com/group/adobe.photoshop.windows/t/dd532575c7869908?hl=en
==============================================================================

== 1 of 1 ==
Date: Sat, Jun 13 2009 4:29 pm
From: toby

On Jun 13, 3:05 pm, Ramon F Herrera <ra...@conexus.net> wrote:
> Please notice this property tab:
>
> http://patriot.net/~ramon/misc/TIFF-Metadata.png
>
> I would like to insert a short comment in any of those fields which
> are visible from the Windows shell. I have tried from inside Photoshop
> CS2 but I have only been able to make the copyright appear.

You can't do it with Photoshop. Work out which properties Windows is
looking for, then you can use a TIFF utility to set them.

>
> TIA,
>
> -Ramon

==============================================================================

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "adobe.photoshop.windows"
group.

To post to this group, visit http://groups.google.com/group/adobe.photoshop.windows?hl=en

To unsubscribe from this group, send email to adobe.photoshop.windows+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com

To change the way you get mail from this group, visit:
http://groups.google.com/group/adobe.photoshop.windows/subscribe?hl=en

To report abuse, send email explaining the problem to abuse@googlegroups.com

==============================================================================
Google Groups: http://groups.google.com/?hl=en

rec.photo.digital - 7 new messages in 5 topics - digest

rec.photo.digital
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.photo.digital?hl=en

rec.photo.digital@googlegroups.com

Today's topics:

* grim news for photographers tourism and rights - 3 messages, 1 author
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.photo.digital/t/f739094ebddaa70e?hl=en
* What a waste these groups are... - 1 messages, 1 author
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.photo.digital/t/ad679aa87d2eb7b1?hl=en
* Correct name for "pinhole lens" used in covert cameras? - 1 messages, 1
author
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.photo.digital/t/4a3f36ff97395b3f?hl=en
* Whatever happened to the "single pixel" camera idea? - 1 messages, 1 author
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.photo.digital/t/132ae2d328416321?hl=en
* A newbie request help selecting digital camera - 1 messages, 1 author
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.photo.digital/t/4222610fecc12359?hl=en

==============================================================================
TOPIC: grim news for photographers tourism and rights
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.photo.digital/t/f739094ebddaa70e?hl=en
==============================================================================

== 1 of 3 ==
Date: Sun, Jun 14 2009 11:15 pm
From: floyd@apaflo.com (Floyd L. Davidson)

tony cooper <tony_cooper213@earthlink.net> wrote:
>On Sun, 14 Jun 2009 18:03:35 -0800, floyd@apaflo.com (Floyd L.
>Davidson) wrote:
>
>>tony cooper <tony_cooper213@earthlink.net> wrote:
>>>On Sun, 14 Jun 2009 08:54:40 -0800, floyd@apaflo.com (Floyd L.
>>>Davidson) wrote:
>>>
>>>>>Ridiculous maybe but correct. A shop is PRIVATE property. The public is
>>>>>permitted to enter but the owner may place any (legal) restriction they
>>>>>wish on people entering. Such as no photography.
>>>>
>>>>They have to post it first, not after the fact.
>>>
>>>No they don't. Becker was not detained for taking a photograph, but
>>>your statement is incorrect.
>>
>>They don't??? They can charge someone for doing something
>>that was not prohibited until after it was done??? That is
>>so typical of your illogical responses here...
>>
>>Actually, the initial detainment *was* for taking a
>>photograph. He was arrested for not producing an ID.
>>
>>Get your facts straight.
>
>No, he was never detained for taking a photograph. Even Shane does
>not claim that in his narrative.

Straight facts:

"They saw me take the picture. After they were done
filling the machine with money, the one with the
shaved head came over to me in line and said:

Him
When you're done over here, come talk to me.

Me
No, thanks.

Him
Don't try to leave. I will tackle you."

At that point a Loomis guard, wearing a uniform with a
badge and in visible possession of a gun, has placed
Shane Becker under detention (arrest) and verbally
assaulted him. The only apparant reason is that Becker
took a picture.

Both the detention and the assault are criminal.

>>The Loomis guard ordered Becker to stay there, under
>>threat of violence. That is by definition detaining
>>him.
>
>No, that is a demand, but not a detention. The demand was not heeded.
>Becker walked away.

Becker did *not* walk away. He was in a line at the
Customer Service Counter, and he stayed there.. He also
did not try to leave the store, which is what it appears
he was told he could not do.

>Let's add "definition" to the list of words you don't understand.

You don't seem to understand that when a uniformed
person with a badge and a gun tells someone they cannot
leave at their own free will they are in fact under
"detention".

Black's Law Dictionary defines it as I've used it;
however, it is also interesting to note that Washington
State does *not* make the distinction between detainment
and arrest in the way that I have!

In the State of Washington, by definition, Becker was
placed under arrest by the Loomis Guard when he was told
not to leave.

Washington courts have cited this definition of "arrest":

"a show of authority sufficient to convey to any
reasonable person that voluntary departure from the
scene was not a reasonable alternative."
United States v Palmer, 603F.2d 1286, 1289 (8th Cir. 1979).

See also:

United States v. Mendenhall 446 U.S. 544 100
S.Ct. 1870, 64 Led 2d 497 (1980);

State v. Young, 135 Wn. 2d 498, 509, 957 P.2d 681
(1988);

>>It is not something that I made up.
>
>Of course it is. Read the narrative.

"They saw me take the picture. After they were done
filling the machine with money, the one with the
shaved head came over to me in line and said:

Him
When you're done over here, come talk to me.

Me
No, thanks.

Him
Don't try to leave. I will tackle you."

So you are lying, or what? You cite a narrative that
does not support your claims. You say that definitions
are not what the Washington State court (see Seattle
v. Sage) says they are.

What in the Heck is the matter with you Tony????

--
Floyd L. Davidson <http://www.apaflo.com/floyd_davidson>
Ukpeagvik (Barrow, Alaska) floyd@apaflo.com

== 2 of 3 ==
Date: Sun, Jun 14 2009 11:36 pm
From: floyd@apaflo.com (Floyd L. Davidson)

tony cooper <tony_cooper213@earthlink.net> wrote:
>On Sun, 14 Jun 2009 18:44:49 -0800, floyd@apaflo.com (Floyd L.
>Davidson) wrote:
>
>>Where is your "logical progression"? The guard told
>>Becker not to leave, and threatened him with physical
>>violence.
>>
>>That is a detetion by definition.
>
>We've covered this, haven't we? Becker walked away from the guard.
>He was not detained by the guard. He ignored the demand. It does not
>meet the definition of detention.

Becker did not walk away from the Loomis guard. The Loomis Guard
places him under detention and then the *Guard* walked away from
Becker, who was in line for the Customer Service Counter and stayed
there.

>>>You detain someone by force or by exercising the authority of law. The
>>>Loomis guard did neither. Telling someone not to leave is not
>>>detaining them.
>>
>>When the person doing so has a gun and a badge, and
>>threatens physical violence if any attempt is made to
>>leave, that *is* a detention.
>
>No, it's detention when the person is actually detained.

"a show of authority sufficient to convey to any
reasonable person that voluntary departure form the
scene was not a reasonable alternative."
United States v Palmer, 603F.2d 1286, 1289 (8th Cir. 1979).

Washington courts have cited the above definition
multiple times. It works for them, it works for me, and
it is the law of the land in Seattle.

But Tony Cooper says it isn't so??? Now, who cares what
Tony says if he can't get that straight? Do you see
what that sort of argument does to your credibility?

>>>Becker moved to the customer service line to pay for
>>>his lock (?). You can hardly say Becker was detained when he moved
>>>away from the Loomis guard and continued about his business.
>>
>>They told him not to leave the store. He didn't.
>
>No, he didn't, but not because of the guard's demand. It was because
>he stood there and argued until the police came. He could have walked
>out at any time before that. He chose not to.

He chose not to because he had clearly been, lawfully or otherwise,
placed under detention by a uniformed individual with a badge and a gun
who had threatened violence if he did. How can you say that any
reasonable person "could have walked out"???? Absurd!

>>
>>>>>>and swore
>>>>>>to a Seattle Police officer that he had broken a law.
>>>>>
>>>>>Where in the world do you get this?
>>>>
>>>>What do you suppose they told the officer? Some story
>>>>about how they were having fun picking on an innocent
>>>>guy??? Or what?
>>>
>>>I don't know. You want me to conjecture? OK, I *suppose* he told the
>>>officer what is in the police report: "He was concerned about his
>>>safety and was not sure if (Becker) was going to attempted (sic) to
>>>grab the money that was going into the ATM machine (sic)."
>>
>>You don't seem to be able to follow logical progression
>>Tony. That statement refers to what the guard claims
>>was the reason to question Becker to start with. By the
>>time the police officer arrived the money was in the
>>ATM, not available to for anyone to "grab", and the
>>officer certainly was not asking that Becker be arrested
>>for having grabbed money or at that point being a threat
>>to grab money.
>
>That's the only statement that is reported that the guard made. Your
>fabrication about swearing that he broke a law is just that: a
>fabrication.
>
>If you disagree, it's simple for you to prove that I'm wrong. Just
>point out any statement in Becker's own narrative or the police report
>where this is alleged. Go on...find a statement that supports your
>claim.

Lets explain something to you. A police officer cannot
just arrest someone as a casual matter of "questioning"
them. That violates the 4th Amendment and the courts
have been vociferous about it.

The Seattle Police officer needed "Reasonable Suspicion"
or "Probable Cause" to believe first that a crime had
been committed and second that Shane Becker could
reasonably be the perpetrator.

Failure to provide an ID and/or refused to answer
questions is not sufficient (due to the 5th Amendment).
Taking a photograph is not sufficient. And there has
been no allegation that Becker did *anything* illegal in
the presence of the Seattle Police officers. That
leaves only one single possible source for "Reasonable
Suspicion" or "Probably Cause": statements by another
uniformed police officer, such as the Loomis Guard.

Why? Well, because if the store's personnel or anyone
else said they saw Becker commit a crime it simply does
not rise to the same level that testimony of a police
officer does. If that had happened the officers need to
get a warrant from a judge.

All of which leaves only the possibility that the
Seattle Police officers took the statements of the
Loomis guards as their authority to make an arrest.

Lacking that, it is simply a case of harassment and
false arrest with no probably cause.

>Find anything in Becker's narrative or the police report that supports
>your statement. Find anything in Becker's narrative or the police
>report that states, infers, or hints at Becker being detained by
>anyone except the police officer.

"They saw me take the picture. After they were done
filling the machine with money, the one with the
shaved head came over to me in line and said:

Him
When you're done over here, come talk to me.

Me
No, thanks.

Him
Don't try to leave. I will tackle you."

Do you really need to be reminded of this again?

>Find anything that indicates that
>Becker could not have walked out of the store at any time prior to the
>arrival of the police.

"Don't try to leave. I will tackle you."

From a guy with a shaved head, a uniform, a badge, and a gun.

--
Floyd L. Davidson <http://www.apaflo.com/floyd_davidson>
Ukpeagvik (Barrow, Alaska) floyd@apaflo.com

== 3 of 3 ==
Date: Sun, Jun 14 2009 11:48 pm
From: floyd@apaflo.com (Floyd L. Davidson)

tony cooper <tony_cooper213@earthlink.net> wrote:
>On Sun, 14 Jun 2009 18:15:23 -0800, floyd@apaflo.com (Floyd L.
>Davidson) wrote:
>
>>"Susp Cir" is not a crime. He was told not to leave, therefore he
>>*cannot* be trespassing.
>
>I wanted to believe that, in all your posts, you've written something
>that is accurate. I figured Flim-Flam Floyd or not, he's got to be
>right about something.
>
>The closest I could come is your statement that he was told not to
>leave. I found this in Becker's narrative:
>
> Him
> When you're done over here, come talk to me.
> Me
> No, thanks.
> Him
> Don't try to leave. I will tackle you.
> Me
> No, you won't.
> Him
> I'll call the cops.
> Me
> I can't stop you.
>
>OK, the Loomis guard says "Don't try to leave". Floyd's right!
>
>Wait a minute, though. Becker says "No, thanks" to the guard's demand
>to come over and talk to him. And he doesn't return. He isn't
>intimidated by the man, the badge, or the gun. Obviously, then,
>Becker is aware that the Loomis guard's demand is meaningless
>rhetoric. Why would Becker think the demand "Don't try to leave" is
>any different?
>
>Becker says in another place "I was not told to leave. I was told in
>no uncertain terms that I could not leave", but he doesn't say who
>told him that. Spunky little guy that he is, trained anarchist and
>all, why does he accept that this demand must be obeyed? He refused
>the demand to come back and talk. He refused the demand to produce
>ID. Why does he accept the demand not to leave?
>
>Why does he not just walk out of the store? When he could, that is.
>It was too late when the police arrived.
>
>I can only come up with a couple of reasons. One, he was too thick to
>think of it. Two, he chose to stay. Not that he was detained, not
>that he was forced to stay, but that he decided to stay. On his own.
>
>Sorry, Floyd. I can't give you this one either.

But you have just totally discredited yourself, so you
*have* just given me that one.

He clearly did *not* walk out of there, and it very
clearly would have been a very unreasonable thing for
him to attempt. He did the only things he could:

1) He stayed there.
2) He refused to talk to the police (or the security guard).

Ask any lawyer you like, and that is very close to
exactly what the lawyer will tell you he *should* have
done. Indeed, the fact that he did it the way he did is
exactly the reason they were unable to bring charges
against him.

--
Floyd L. Davidson <http://www.apaflo.com/floyd_davidson>
Ukpeagvik (Barrow, Alaska) floyd@apaflo.com

==============================================================================
TOPIC: What a waste these groups are...
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.photo.digital/t/ad679aa87d2eb7b1?hl=en
==============================================================================

== 1 of 1 ==
Date: Sun, Jun 14 2009 11:16 pm
From: Rich

On Jun 14, 8:13 pm, "Bertram Paul" <d...@mail.me> wrote:
> You show some picture, you get none or just a few replies.
>
> You start talking about something trivial like card types and you get
> hundreds of replies. But all are fighting each other.
> It makes kinder garden look like a university!
>
> I'm out of here.
>
> --
> ---
> Bertram Paul

Kindergarten
I don't mind responding to pictures, but what I HATE is when some
ass---- says, "Look at this image" then directs you to a whole page of
images, or pages, (just to pump up their site hit rates) rather than
the specific image.

==============================================================================
TOPIC: Correct name for "pinhole lens" used in covert cameras?
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.photo.digital/t/4a3f36ff97395b3f?hl=en
==============================================================================

== 1 of 1 ==
Date: Sun, Jun 14 2009 11:23 pm
From: Rich

On Jun 14, 1:45 am, The Correction Police <t...@knowldegeisgood.com>
wrote:

>Anton van Leeuwenhoek would also disagree with you, when
> he was able to obtain sharp magnifications up to 500x by the use of only
> one of these miniature lenses, hand-ground. This also happening over 350
> years ago. Much has changed and improved since then.

Leeuwenhoek microscopes (on hand, few that there are) went up to about
266x. It is theorized he had them up to 500x. In addition, it is
very possible his lenses were ground aspherical, unlike small
spherical lenses you can buy today so the correction across the field
with his would have been superior. Which is how he was able to
observe small things in detail and even bacteria and detect Brownian
motion, while those using compound microscopes with spherical lenses
had no hope of seeing things in that detail, in those days.

==============================================================================
TOPIC: Whatever happened to the "single pixel" camera idea?
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.photo.digital/t/132ae2d328416321?hl=en
==============================================================================

== 1 of 1 ==
Date: Sun, Jun 14 2009 11:23 pm
From: Rich

I remember reading about it a few years back.

==============================================================================
TOPIC: A newbie request help selecting digital camera
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.photo.digital/t/4222610fecc12359?hl=en
==============================================================================

== 1 of 1 ==
Date: Sun, Jun 14 2009 11:56 pm
From: "David J Taylor"

Kris Krieger wrote:
[]
> My worrry, tho' is spending a couple hundred $$ on one, and finding
> out that it doesn't take crips pictures, or that the colors are off,
> or some other flaw, because I didn't know what I was buying...

Kris,

I think you will find that any of today's DSLRs will do what you want.
They all have fine control over the colour rendering - but it may be up to
you to get the colour temperature correct for your shots or using manual
colour balance and a white card. You can usually adjust the sharpness for
the JPEGs produced by the camera.

My prime camera is a Nikon D60 - the bottom of the range - and I've been
very pleased with it. I usually carry the 16-85mm and 70-300mm VR (image
stabilised) lenses, giving me a "35mm equivalent" focal length range of
24-450mm. I also carry a compact P&S camera - the Panasonic TZ3 - for
those times when I need a "pocket-sized" camera.

Cheers,
David

==============================================================================

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "rec.photo.digital"
group.

To post to this group, visit http://groups.google.com/group/rec.photo.digital?hl=en

To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rec.photo.digital+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com

To change the way you get mail from this group, visit:
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.photo.digital/subscribe?hl=en

To report abuse, send email explaining the problem to abuse@googlegroups.com

==============================================================================
Google Groups: http://groups.google.com/?hl=en

adobe.photoshop.elements - 2 new messages in 2 topics - digest

adobe.photoshop.elements
http://groups.google.com/group/adobe.photoshop.elements?hl=en

adobe.photoshop.elements@googlegroups.com

Today's topics:

* Corum Bubble XL Diamond Steel Blue Ladies Watch 163-157-47-F403-PN75R - 1
messages, 1 author
http://groups.google.com/group/adobe.photoshop.elements/t/3e4e53e1f09e4251?hl=en
* Adobe website consistently unavailable - 1 messages, 1 author
http://groups.google.com/group/adobe.photoshop.elements/t/ada3ed549acf67fc?hl=en

==============================================================================
TOPIC: Corum Bubble XL Diamond Steel Blue Ladies Watch 163-157-47-F403-PN75R
http://groups.google.com/group/adobe.photoshop.elements/t/3e4e53e1f09e4251?hl=en
==============================================================================

== 1 of 1 ==
Date: Thurs, Jun 4 2009 1:35 am
From: longines01@gmail.com

Corum Bubble XL Diamond Steel Blue Ladies Watch 163-157-47-F403-PN75R

Watches Collection Site : http://www.watchepay.com/
Corum Bubble XL Diamond Steel Blue Ladies Watch 163-157-47-F403-PN75R
View Full :
http://www.watchepay.com/watchs/watch_2454.html

Corum Bubble XL Diamond Steel Blue Ladies Watch 163-157-47-F403-PN75R
AdditionalInfo :

Brand : Corum Watches ( http://watchepay.com/watchs/Corum-watches.html)
Handbags Name : Corum Bubble XL Diamond Steel Blue Ladies
Watch 163-157-47-F403-PN75R 
Code : Corum Bubble XL Diamond Steel Blue Ladies Watch
163-157-47-F403-PN75R 
Gender : Ladies 
CaseMaterial : Stainless Steel 
Bezel : Diamond 
Movement :

Stainless Steel Case. Blue Leather Coated Rubber Strap. Blue Mother-of-
pearl With Diamond Arabic Numerals Dial. Diamond Bezel. Push Button
Deployment Clasp. Domed Scratch Resistant Sapphire Crystal. Date
Displays At 6 O'clock Position. Screw-down Crown. Case Diameter 45mm.
Case Thickness 20mm. Quartz Movement. Water Resistant At 50 meters
(165 feet).

Corum Watches Collection Series :

Bvlgari-Bvlgari Watches Collection :
http://www.watchepay.com/watchs/bvlgari-bvlgari-watches.html

Roger Dubuis watches Collection :
http://www.watchepay.com/watchs/roger_dubuis.html

Omega Constellation Double Eagle Watches Collection :
http://www.watchepay.com/watchs/omega-constellation-double-eagle-watches.html

Patek Philippe Calatrava Watches Collection :
http://www.watchepay.com/watchs/patek-philippe-calatrava-watches.html

Bvlgari Ergon Watches Collection :
http://www.watchepay.com/watchs/bvlgari-ergon-watches.html

Corum Admirals Cup Watches Collection :
http://www.watchepay.com/watchs/corum-admirals-cup-watches.html

Corum Coin Watches Collection :
http://www.watchepay.com/watchs/corum-coin-watches.html

Movado Valeto Watches Collection :
http://www.watchepay.com/watchs/movado-valeto-watches.html

Rolex Pearlmaster Watches Collection :
http://www.watchepay.com/watchs/rolex-pearlmaster-watches.html

Rolex Yacht-Master Watches Collection :
http://www.watchepay.com/watchs/rolex-yacht-master-watches.html

Movado Celestina Watches Collection :
http://www.watchepay.com/watchs/movado-celestina-watches.html

Movado Strato Watches Collection :
http://www.watchepay.com/watchs/movado-strato-watches.html

==============================================================================
TOPIC: Adobe website consistently unavailable
http://groups.google.com/group/adobe.photoshop.elements/t/ada3ed549acf67fc?hl=en
==============================================================================

== 1 of 1 ==
Date: Sun, Jun 14 2009 11:56 pm
From: mikeos

Why am I never, uniquely, able to connect to the Adobe web site? This is
a permanent state of affairs, and ONLY affects this site. I ALWAYS get a
"page load error". Is there any solution?

==============================================================================

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "adobe.photoshop.elements"
group.

To post to this group, visit http://groups.google.com/group/adobe.photoshop.elements?hl=en

To unsubscribe from this group, send email to adobe.photoshop.elements+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com

To change the way you get mail from this group, visit:
http://groups.google.com/group/adobe.photoshop.elements/subscribe?hl=en

To report abuse, send email explaining the problem to abuse@googlegroups.com

==============================================================================
Google Groups: http://groups.google.com/?hl=en

Photoshop How To Use

Categories

Blog Archive

About Me

Monday, June 15, 2009

[fnftwo] Kate's TTC from Roni

[PSP-Snags] Re: Request for SW 35 & 36

HayalDunyamiz Andy Williams-El Condor Pasa_Iclal

[fnftwo] Marlie

[PSP-Snags] Re: Misc QP & Cluster frame freebies previews / blog links 3

it.comp.grafica.photoshop - 6 nuovi messaggi in 5 argomenti - digest

alt.graphics.photoshop - 7 new messages in 2 topics - digest

adobe.photoshop.windows - 1 new message in 1 topic - digest

rec.photo.digital - 7 new messages in 5 topics - digest

adobe.photoshop.elements - 2 new messages in 2 topics - digest

Live Traffic

Categories

Blog Archive

About Me

Monday, June 15, 2009

Search

Live Traffic