Sunday, January 18, 2009

alt.graphics.photoshop - 15 new messages in 5 topics - digest

alt.graphics.photoshop
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.graphics.photoshop?hl=en

alt.graphics.photoshop@googlegroups.com

Today's topics:

* How are you doing? - 1 messages, 1 author
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.graphics.photoshop/t/f615c2ad0388fdc8?hl=en
* manuel shutter release cable - 9 messages, 3 authors
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.graphics.photoshop/t/b26f93d00f35ecc6?hl=en
* huey pro - 1 messages, 1 author
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.graphics.photoshop/t/2ea852091bf11687?hl=en
* is this real - 1 messages, 1 author
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.graphics.photoshop/t/1a9de8e0336ac8eb?hl=en
* one or two graphics cards for CS 4? - 3 messages, 2 authors
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.graphics.photoshop/t/b6e85c05eaf2f06f?hl=en

==============================================================================
TOPIC: How are you doing?
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.graphics.photoshop/t/f615c2ad0388fdc8?hl=en
==============================================================================

== 1 of 1 ==
Date: Fri, Jan 16 2009 10:09 pm
From: Dave


On Fri, 16 Jan 2009 17:43:54 -0500, Voivod <Voi@vod.con> wrote:

>Because the humor was in this not that.

This was not overlooked, believe me

==============================================================================
TOPIC: manuel shutter release cable
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.graphics.photoshop/t/b26f93d00f35ecc6?hl=en
==============================================================================

== 1 of 9 ==
Date: Sat, Jan 17 2009 3:42 am
From: Dave

Since I'm living on the beachfront in Durban,
my (first) manual shutter release cable picked up a coarseness on the
inside of the casing, which could be nothing else than rust.
I had to find another one for my Fuji Finepix s9600.

This same release, seen under SHUTTER RELEASE CABLE at
http://www.alzodigital.com/online_store/digital_camera_fuji_s9000_kit.htm
became very very scarce. I battled finding one, would have ordered one
from abroad if necessary, but could not even find one internationally.
WOW!!! Then I was lucky enough to find one locally in Cape Town!

I ordered it and received it this morning and knowing how hard it was
finding it, it should be handled with satin gloves.

My question: Should I/ can I/ treat it with engine oil or gun oil
inside the casing? Or, are there any reason for not doing it?

== 2 of 9 ==
Date: Sat, Jan 17 2009 4:44 am
From: John J


Dave wrote:

> I ordered it and received it this morning and knowing how hard it was
> finding it, it should be handled with satin gloves.
>
> My question: Should I/ can I/ treat it with engine oil or gun oil
> inside the casing? Or, are there any reason for not doing it?

Those releases are very common elsewhere. I am always losing cable
releases so I have a dozen.

Do nothing to it. Any lube you put into the cable will find its way into
the camera. Graphite is the very worst! Oils trap dust. Do nothing. Get
a few spare releases.


== 3 of 9 ==
Date: Sat, Jan 17 2009 5:18 am
From: Dave


On Sat, 17 Jan 2009 06:44:26 -0600, John J <nohj@droffats.ten> wrote:

>Dave wrote:
>
>> I ordered it and received it this morning and knowing how hard it was
>> finding it, it should be handled with satin gloves.
>>
>> My question: Should I/ can I/ treat it with engine oil or gun oil
>> inside the casing? Or, are there any reason for not doing it?
>
>Those releases are very common elsewhere. I am always losing cable
>releases so I have a dozen.
>

Believe me John, they are not as common to find as you think.
I found forums with people complaining (not locally!) about not
finding it. Right here in Durban, 3 photo shops promised to help
finding it. Prove it to yourself - see how many ads (other than the
one I supplied) you can find (Manual versions remember).
The one I posted is in Spain I think.

I used weeks to make sure of my facts. You bought your dozen
when the were easier available.

I was searching for a Fuji product but I assume more of them would
fit.

>Do nothing to it. Any lube you put into the cable will find its way into
>the camera. Graphite is the very worst! Oils trap dust. Do nothing. Get
>a few spare releases.

Thanks for your advice. This is why I asked before doing anything to
it. Then, I should order another one while I know where to find it.
BUT... (!) the spare one(s) will be stored right here in this moist
atmosphere as well:-)

== 4 of 9 ==
Date: Sat, Jan 17 2009 8:37 am
From: "tweaked_eye"


You put it in a ziplock bag with some sawdust or flour.

> BUT... (!) the spare one(s) will be stored right here in this moist
> atmosphere as well:-)
>


== 5 of 9 ==
Date: Sat, Jan 17 2009 8:40 am
From: John J


Dave wrote:
> On Sat, 17 Jan 2009 06:44:26 -0600, John J <nohj@droffats.ten> wrote:
>
> Believe me John, they are not as common to find as you think.

I think we have an international gap. I live in Minnesota USA where we
can still get those. In fact, last summer a dealer had a big box of them
for a sidewalk sale.

> I found forums with people complaining (not locally!) about not
> finding it. Right here in Durban, 3 photo shops promised to help
> finding it. Prove it to yourself - see how many ads (other than the
> one I supplied) you can find (Manual versions remember).
> The one I posted is in Spain I think.

OK! Keep in mind that most cable releases with with most shutters. There
is a subtle, but insignificant difference between shutter that prefer
tapered ends and those with straight ends. The tapered ones work with
either.

http://www.bhphotovideo.com has six pages of cable releases
http://www.adorama.com several
http://www.freestylephoto.biz has 29 hits

The list goes on and on.

> I used weeks to make sure of my facts. You bought your dozen
> when the were easier available.
>
> I was searching for a Fuji product but I assume more of them would
> fit.

Yes. Show me a close-up of the Fuji tip and I guarantee you I can find a
dozen sources of the perfect cable release.


== 6 of 9 ==
Date: Sat, Jan 17 2009 10:50 am
From: Dave


On Sat, 17 Jan 2009 10:40:25 -0600, John J <nohj@droffats.ten> wrote:

>Dave wrote:
>> On Sat, 17 Jan 2009 06:44:26 -0600, John J <nohj@droffats.ten> wrote:
>>
>> Believe me John, they are not as common to find as you think.
>
>I think we have an international gap. I live in Minnesota USA where we
>can still get those. In fact, last summer a dealer had a big box of them
>for a sidewalk sale.
>
This is certainly the reason. I checked on al three your links
and certainly there they are. I did not even found (or noticed)
those links on a search machine. Thanks therefore, you convinced me.

Reason for not picking up those links (AND also the reason for
battling to find what I was searching for) was certainly searching
*specific for 'manual shutter releases for the Fuji Finepix 9600. I
thought of the possibility that the fittings could be universal, but
still searched specific.

Read this by someone also searching (in 2005:-)
http://www.clubsnap.com/forums/showthread.php?t=204283

Maybe there are no shutter releases made by Fuji but
the shutter release only includes a release socket that is designed
to receive a screw-in cable release, made by whichever manufacturer.

>> I found forums with people complaining (not locally!) about not
>> finding it. Right here in Durban, 3 photo shops promised to help
>> finding it. Prove it to yourself - see how many ads (other than the
>> one I supplied) you can find (Manual versions remember).
>> The one I posted is in Spain I think.
>
>OK! Keep in mind that most cable releases with with most shutters. There
>is a subtle, but insignificant difference between shutter that prefer
>tapered ends and those with straight ends. The tapered ones work with
>either.
>

This is most important what you are explaining here.
It would have been to risky ordering it from abroad only hoping it to
fit. Thanks again, I'll save your explanation somewhere
in my camera data and software.


>http://www.bhphotovideo.com has six pages of cable releases
>http://www.adorama.com several
>http://www.freestylephoto.biz has 29 hits
>
>The list goes on and on.
>
>> I used weeks to make sure of my facts. You bought your dozen
>> when the were easier available.
>>
>> I was searching for a Fuji product but I assume more of them would
>> fit.
>
>Yes. Show me a close-up of the Fuji tip and I guarantee you I can find a
>dozen sources of the perfect cable release.


== 7 of 9 ==
Date: Sat, Jan 17 2009 11:06 am
From: Dave


On Sat, 17 Jan 2009 08:37:01 -0800, "tweaked_eye"
<nospam@spammersuck.com> wrote:

>You put it in a ziplock bag with some sawdust or flour.
>
>> BUT... (!) the spare one(s) will be stored right here in this moist
>> atmosphere as well:-)
>>
>

Thanks. Then maybe (and even more practical:-) I can simply store it
in my safe where there are bags of silica gel for keeping moisture
from my guns.

Thanks for your reply. The safe is where it will be.

== 8 of 9 ==
Date: Sat, Jan 17 2009 12:55 pm
From: John J


Dave wrote:
> On Sat, 17 Jan 2009 10:40:25 -0600, John J <nohj@droffats.ten> wrote:
>
>> Dave wrote:
>>> On Sat, 17 Jan 2009 06:44:26 -0600, John J <nohj@droffats.ten> wrote:
>>>
>>> Believe me John, they are not as common to find as you think.
>> I think we have an international gap. I live in Minnesota USA where we
>> can still get those. In fact, last summer a dealer had a big box of them
>> for a sidewalk sale.
>>
> This is certainly the reason. I checked on al three your links
> and certainly there they are. I did not even found (or noticed)
> those links on a search machine. Thanks therefore, you convinced me.
> [... snip generous post ...]

My pleasure, Dave. I certainly understand the confusion, especially as
it regards digital cameras because manufacturers tend to re-invent
proprietary parts when not really necessary. Fuji did not. It apparently
uses the typical tapered release. Fuji is a most excellent company.

FWIW, not that I'm so smart. I've simply been at this for over 40 years;
I build cameras, too.

Enjoy!

John


== 9 of 9 ==
Date: Sat, Jan 17 2009 12:59 pm
From: John J


Dave wrote:
> On Sat, 17 Jan 2009 08:37:01 -0800, "tweaked_eye"
> <nospam@spammersuck.com> wrote:
>
>> You put it in a ziplock bag with some sawdust or flour.
>>
>>> BUT... (!) the spare one(s) will be stored right here in this moist
>>> atmosphere as well:-)
>>>
>
> Thanks. Then maybe (and even more practical:-) I can simply store it
> in my safe where there are bags of silica gel for keeping moisture
> from my guns.

Yup! That works very well. My dad taught me that. I use the two-pound
re-usable bags of silicone. I've still got the .22 rifle he gave me in
1952, and it is rust free.

==============================================================================
TOPIC: huey pro
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.graphics.photoshop/t/2ea852091bf11687?hl=en
==============================================================================

== 1 of 1 ==
Date: Sat, Jan 17 2009 5:24 am
From: ilaboo


used it on with my hpw2558hc--left pink gradient--had agida to manualy
calibrate the monitor--using geforce xt express 1 gig--win xp pro--usd
the computer about 10 times all of a sudden dialog screen came up
saying huey pro ( on boot up) and then it disappeared--monitor looks
pretty good--would i buy this monitor again--not sure--contrast upper
part ok but some degegation on bottom--would im buy the huey pfro-yes
just to understand the technology--would i recommend it to others--not
sure--look around more


hth others
peter

==============================================================================
TOPIC: is this real
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.graphics.photoshop/t/1a9de8e0336ac8eb?hl=en
==============================================================================

== 1 of 1 ==
Date: Sat, Jan 17 2009 9:26 am
From: Sir F. A. Rien


John J <nohj@droffats.ten> found these unused words:

>Sir F. A. Rien wrote:
>> Ragnarth <ragnar.valgeirsson@gmail.com> found these unused words:
>>
>>> Hi there.
>>> i got this mail from a friend.
>>>
>>> If you want to make money from home, you should check out internet
>>> business.
>>>
>>> www.MonkeyMillionare.com
>>
>> Yes Ponzi SCAMs are 'real' - they'll really 'take you to the cleaners'.
>
>The only Ponzi scheme that is 'legal' is the US Government's.

Most gumints have that 'scheme' going. It's called "Social Equality".

That's where those in power, keep theirs and add to it, the 'great unwashed'
pay for them and the designated PO' [those too lazy to work or unwilling to
make an effort to learn].

{There are deserving persons/situations who can not 'better' themselves, but
more than 50% fall into that 'fre ride' group!}


==============================================================================
TOPIC: one or two graphics cards for CS 4?
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.graphics.photoshop/t/b6e85c05eaf2f06f?hl=en
==============================================================================

== 1 of 3 ==
Date: Sat, Jan 17 2009 2:33 pm
From: Father Kodak


Are there any situations in which Photoshop CS 4 will take advantage
of a second video card?

If more video memory is "better" with CS 4, is it better to have two
cards with say 512 MB each or one card with 1 GB?

I am not a gamer, so I don't need high frame rate video performance.

--AH


== 2 of 3 ==
Date: Sat, Jan 17 2009 6:58 pm
From: Dave


On Sat, 17 Jan 2009 14:33:03 -0800, Father Kodak
<dont_bother@IDontCare.COM> wrote:

>Are there any situations in which Photoshop CS 4 will take advantage
>of a second video card?
>
>If more video memory is "better" with CS 4, is it better to have two
>cards with say 512 MB each or one card with 1 GB?
>
>I am not a gamer, so I don't need high frame rate video performance.
>
>--AH


maybe the answer to your question is to be found here:

http://kb.adobe.com/selfservice/viewContent.do?externalId=kb404898


== 3 of 3 ==
Date: Sat, Jan 17 2009 11:57 pm
From: Father Kodak


On Sun, 18 Jan 2009 04:58:27 +0200, Dave <dave@durbs.koza> wrote:

>On Sat, 17 Jan 2009 14:33:03 -0800, Father Kodak
><dont_bother@IDontCare.COM> wrote:
>
>>Are there any situations in which Photoshop CS 4 will take advantage
>>of a second video card?
>>
>>If more video memory is "better" with CS 4, is it better to have two
>>cards with say 512 MB each or one card with 1 GB?
>>
>>I am not a gamer, so I don't need high frame rate video performance.
>>
>>--AH
>
>
>maybe the answer to your question is to be found here:
>
>http://kb.adobe.com/selfservice/viewContent.do?externalId=kb404898

Thank you. I guess I should have looked at the Adobe site before
posting this question. Here are the relevant parts of the Q&A:

Q. Does Photoshop take advantage of dual-GPU display cards? <- NOTE
A. Not at this time.

Q. Why can't Photoshop take advantage of more than one display card?
A. When you move an image window between two monitors that are each on
a separate display card, the GPU attached to the second monitor does
not have access to the data necessary to accelerate drawing. The SLI
and Crossfire technologies that use more than one GPU to speed up
full-screen games will not work with Photoshop, because their use is
limited by design to accelerate only full-screen games. <- NOTE

thank you.

Pere Kodak


==============================================================================

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "alt.graphics.photoshop"
group.

To post to this group, visit http://groups.google.com/group/alt.graphics.photoshop?hl=en

To unsubscribe from this group, send email to alt.graphics.photoshop+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com

To change the way you get mail from this group, visit:
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.graphics.photoshop/subscribe?hl=en

To report abuse, send email explaining the problem to abuse@googlegroups.com

==============================================================================
Google Groups: http://groups.google.com/?hl=en

0 comments:

Template by - Abdul Munir | Daya Earth Blogger Template