alt.design.graphics
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.design.graphics?hl=en
alt.design.graphics@googlegroups.com
Today's topics:
* Idea For An iPhone Type Application - 5 messages, 3 authors
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.design.graphics/t/8b11d2cb0cc4382d?hl=en
* Alright, Listen Up Morons - 6 messages, 2 authors
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.design.graphics/t/4750a1257dc9498f?hl=en
* New Micro-PhotoStock - 1 messages, 1 author
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.design.graphics/t/ac72e5ec94b11d96?hl=en
* Logo Design Contest? - 1 messages, 1 author
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.design.graphics/t/c2db836778c55bb5?hl=en
==============================================================================
TOPIC: Idea For An iPhone Type Application
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.design.graphics/t/8b11d2cb0cc4382d?hl=en
==============================================================================
== 1 of 5 ==
Date: Tues, Jun 16 2009 11:29 pm
From: Rebecca Ore
In article <bKZZl.217187$4p1.92302@en-nntp-03.dc1.easynews.com>,
Rev Turd Fredericks <turdfred2@catholic.org> wrote:
> Onideus Mad Hatter wrote:
> > Okay, you know how they have those like "Amber Alert" thingies, right?
> > Well, what if they had something like that for cell phones in an app?
> > So like if a child went missing you would get a phone call and the
> > picture of the child would pop up on your cell phone for everyone who
> > had the application. What do you think? Or has it already been done
> > before?
> >
> In principle, it's a good idea.
Most missing children are with the other parent. The initial idea with
Amber alerts on highways was to spot the rare cases of stranger
abduction in the first minutes of abduction while the abductor was
driving away with the child. Looking at pictures on cell phones and
driving don't work really well.
Amber alerts were one of those feel good ideas that initial made some
vague sense when they were electronic billboards on highways. Once they
became a web-based program/email program, they were essentially
pointless (point being to catch perps as they were driving away with the
victims, before anything bad happened).
== 2 of 5 ==
Date: Wed, Jun 17 2009 6:15 pm
From: Rev Turd Fredericks
Rebecca Ore wrote:
> In article <bKZZl.217187$4p1.92302@en-nntp-03.dc1.easynews.com>,
> Rev Turd Fredericks <turdfred2@catholic.org> wrote:
>
>> Onideus Mad Hatter wrote:
>>> Okay, you know how they have those like "Amber Alert" thingies, right?
>>> Well, what if they had something like that for cell phones in an app?
>>> So like if a child went missing you would get a phone call and the
>>> picture of the child would pop up on your cell phone for everyone who
>>> had the application. What do you think? Or has it already been done
>>> before?
>>>
>> In principle, it's a good idea.
>
> Most missing children are with the other parent. The initial idea with
> Amber alerts on highways was to spot the rare cases of stranger
> abduction in the first minutes of abduction while the abductor was
> driving away with the child. Looking at pictures on cell phones and
> driving don't work really well.
A non-custodial parent making a run for the border with a kid can be
just as serious as stranger abduction.
>
> Amber alerts were one of those feel good ideas that initial made some
> vague sense when they were electronic billboards on highways. Once they
> became a web-based program/email program, they were essentially
> pointless (point being to catch perps as they were driving away with the
> victims, before anything bad happened).
Or catch them at the supermarket, or a gas station, or stuck at the side
of the road or...
== 3 of 5 ==
Date: Wed, Jun 17 2009 7:04 pm
From: Rebecca Ore
In article <gzg_l.166762$Xo1.95743@en-nntp-07.dc1.easynews.com>,
Rev Turd Fredericks <turdfred2@catholic.org> wrote:
> Rebecca Ore wrote:
> > In article <bKZZl.217187$4p1.92302@en-nntp-03.dc1.easynews.com>,
> > Rev Turd Fredericks <turdfred2@catholic.org> wrote:
> >
> >> Onideus Mad Hatter wrote:
> >>> Okay, you know how they have those like "Amber Alert" thingies, right?
> >>> Well, what if they had something like that for cell phones in an app?
> >>> So like if a child went missing you would get a phone call and the
> >>> picture of the child would pop up on your cell phone for everyone who
> >>> had the application. What do you think? Or has it already been done
> >>> before?
> >>>
> >> In principle, it's a good idea.
> >
> > Most missing children are with the other parent. The initial idea with
> > Amber alerts on highways was to spot the rare cases of stranger
> > abduction in the first minutes of abduction while the abductor was
> > driving away with the child. Looking at pictures on cell phones and
> > driving don't work really well.
>
> A non-custodial parent making a run for the border with a kid can be
> just as serious as stranger abduction.
Bullshit. Stranger abduction is always about either (a) female
snatching a child to raise, or (b) male snatching a child to rape.
First is rather rare and generally fairly obvious. Second generally
kills the kid in the first three hours.
The original intention was NOT to have custody dispute cases be Amber
Alert cases.
Try Wikipedia's article on Amber Alerts. Crime Theatre, really.
I don't believe either parent if the divorce is nasty. A crazy chick in
NC poisoned her kids when the cops were chasing her boyfriend and her as
they drove off to hide out and fight race war in the Virginia
countryside. Then the boy friend and the crazy bitch blew themselves up
rather than get captured. The custodial parent. If her husband had kept
the kids from the bitch, they'd still be alive today. The crazy bitch's
lover murdered her mother-in-law for suggesting something was wrong with
her, and then murdered some kin of hers for wondering if the boys
wouldn't be better off with the father. Jerry Bledsoe wrote about it:
_Bitter Blood_.
Custodial parents can be as abusive and dishonest as the non-custodial
parents. The kids in NC would be alive today if their father had been
willing to break the law (and the two boys asked him to let them stay
with him but the crazy bitch in NC was politically connected).
I don't think anyone can figure out which parent is going to murder the
children to keep them away from the other parent -- and that's rather
rare but not uncommon with women (see Medea), who are likely to be the
custodial parent.
>
> >
> > Amber alerts were one of those feel good ideas that initial made some
> > vague sense when they were electronic billboards on highways. Once they
> > became a web-based program/email program, they were essentially
> > pointless (point being to catch perps as they were driving away with the
> > victims, before anything bad happened).
>
> Or catch them at the supermarket, or a gas station, or stuck at the side
> of the road or...
Most of the time, if it's one of those really bad abductions, the kid is
dead before the Amber alert goes out. Getting kids back from
non-custodial parents is generally fairly simply unless they have reason
to really run (abusive custodial parent or sociopathic lying child).
You need to read this:
http://www.boston.com/bostonglobe/ideas/articles/2008/07/20/abducted/
In Philly, if the car wasn't retrieved in the first 30 minutes, it was
gone. Kids are much easier to hide and softer to cut up.
If the Amber Alerts get a kid killed fast rather than tortured slowly
over days, they might be doing some good, otherwise, not so much.
== 4 of 5 ==
Date: Wed, Jun 17 2009 7:28 pm
From: Rev Turd Fredericks
Rebecca Ore wrote:
> In article <gzg_l.166762$Xo1.95743@en-nntp-07.dc1.easynews.com>,
> Rev Turd Fredericks <turdfred2@catholic.org> wrote:
>
>> Rebecca Ore wrote:
>>> In article <bKZZl.217187$4p1.92302@en-nntp-03.dc1.easynews.com>,
>>> Rev Turd Fredericks <turdfred2@catholic.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Onideus Mad Hatter wrote:
>>>>> Okay, you know how they have those like "Amber Alert" thingies, right?
>>>>> Well, what if they had something like that for cell phones in an app?
>>>>> So like if a child went missing you would get a phone call and the
>>>>> picture of the child would pop up on your cell phone for everyone who
>>>>> had the application. What do you think? Or has it already been done
>>>>> before?
>>>>>
>>>> In principle, it's a good idea.
>>> Most missing children are with the other parent. The initial idea with
>>> Amber alerts on highways was to spot the rare cases of stranger
>>> abduction in the first minutes of abduction while the abductor was
>>> driving away with the child. Looking at pictures on cell phones and
>>> driving don't work really well.
>> A non-custodial parent making a run for the border with a kid can be
>> just as serious as stranger abduction.
>
> Bullshit. Stranger abduction is always about either (a) female
> snatching a child to raise, or (b) male snatching a child to rape.
> First is rather rare and generally fairly obvious. Second generally
> kills the kid in the first three hours.
Either case deprives the custodial parent of their child and the child
of their rightful parent(s)
>
> The original intention was NOT to have custody dispute cases be Amber
> Alert cases.
>
> Try Wikipedia's article on Amber Alerts. Crime Theatre, really.
Yes I read that yesterday. It makes no difference. Both scenarios
involve stealing a child.
>
> I don't believe either parent if the divorce is nasty. A crazy chick in
> NC poisoned her kids when the cops were chasing her boyfriend and her as
> they drove off to hide out and fight race war in the Virginia
> countryside. Then the boy friend and the crazy bitch blew themselves up
> rather than get captured. The custodial parent. If her husband had kept
> the kids from the bitch, they'd still be alive today. The crazy bitch's
> lover murdered her mother-in-law for suggesting something was wrong with
> her, and then murdered some kin of hers for wondering if the boys
> wouldn't be better off with the father. Jerry Bledsoe wrote about it:
> _Bitter Blood_.
So you are saying that non-custodial parents should be able to deprive
custodial parents of custody rather than going through the courts?
>
> Custodial parents can be as abusive and dishonest as the non-custodial
> parents. The kids in NC would be alive today if their father had been
> willing to break the law (and the two boys asked him to let them stay
> with him but the crazy bitch in NC was politically connected).
If the situation was that dire the father could have broken the law.
Fact is he didn't so he probably didn't really care about his kids.
Because in this case "the bitch" was politically connected, is not a
reason to change a policy for the rest of us. I wouldn't blame the amber
alert system for this travesty.
>
> I don't think anyone can figure out which parent is going to murder the
> children to keep them away from the other parent -- and that's rather
> rare but not uncommon with women (see Medea), who are likely to be the
> custodial parent.
>
In the vast majority of cases no parent kills the kids, and they don't
kidnap them either. But the Amber alert system can help reunite
custodial parents with those who would, for example, take the kids to
Mexico never to be seen again.
>
>
>>> Amber alerts were one of those feel good ideas that initial made some
>>> vague sense when they were electronic billboards on highways. Once they
>>> became a web-based program/email program, they were essentially
>>> pointless (point being to catch perps as they were driving away with the
>>> victims, before anything bad happened).
>> Or catch them at the supermarket, or a gas station, or stuck at the side
>> of the road or...
>
> Most of the time, if it's one of those really bad abductions, the kid is
> dead before the Amber alert goes out. Getting kids back from
> non-custodial parents is generally fairly simply unless they have reason
> to really run (abusive custodial parent or sociopathic lying child).
So why take away one of the only chances of catching the abductors?
>
> You need to read this:
>
> http://www.boston.com/bostonglobe/ideas/articles/2008/07/20/abducted/
>
> In Philly, if the car wasn't retrieved in the first 30 minutes, it was
> gone. Kids are much easier to hide and softer to cut up.
>
> If the Amber Alerts get a kid killed fast rather than tortured slowly
> over days, they might be doing some good, otherwise, not so much.
With the Amber alert system there are more eyes looking out for the
abducted child. Because there are isolated incidents where it didn't
work out so well is no reason to criticize it.
== 5 of 5 ==
Date: Wed, Jun 17 2009 7:39 pm
From: Onideus Mad Hatter
On Wed, 17 Jun 2009 22:04:39 -0400, Rebecca Ore <macogoense@gmail.com>
wrote:
>In article <gzg_l.166762$Xo1.95743@en-nntp-07.dc1.easynews.com>,
> Rev Turd Fredericks <turdfred2@catholic.org> wrote:
>
>> Rebecca Ore wrote:
>> > In article <bKZZl.217187$4p1.92302@en-nntp-03.dc1.easynews.com>,
>> > Rev Turd Fredericks <turdfred2@catholic.org> wrote:
>> >
>> >> Onideus Mad Hatter wrote:
>> >>> Okay, you know how they have those like "Amber Alert" thingies, right?
>> >>> Well, what if they had something like that for cell phones in an app?
>> >>> So like if a child went missing you would get a phone call and the
>> >>> picture of the child would pop up on your cell phone for everyone who
>> >>> had the application. What do you think? Or has it already been done
>> >>> before?
>> >>>
>> >> In principle, it's a good idea.
>> >
>> > Most missing children are with the other parent. The initial idea with
>> > Amber alerts on highways was to spot the rare cases of stranger
>> > abduction in the first minutes of abduction while the abductor was
>> > driving away with the child. Looking at pictures on cell phones and
>> > driving don't work really well.
>>
>> A non-custodial parent making a run for the border with a kid can be
>> just as serious as stranger abduction.
>
>Bullshit. Stranger abduction is always about either (a) female
>snatching a child to raise, or (b) male snatching a child to rape.
>First is rather rare and generally fairly obvious. Second generally
>kills the kid in the first three hours.
...you uh...you really have no idea at all what you're talking about.
The last time I was in Wal*Mart and looked at the list of missing kids
and suspected adults...yeah, guess what?! Nearly ALL OF THEM were
female (the suspected/wanted adults).
And if you don't think females are into raping children...yeah, yer
livin in a fuckin bubble, Kiddo. You're the product of a fucked
society that condemns men for sexual deviency and yet praises and
supports women for doing it (Mary Kay Letourneau being the best
example).
Too often in this day in age people like you have the fucked mentality
that a woman couldn't ~possibly~ ever hurt, or rape, or murder a
child, often you're so completely fucked in the head that you'll
actually actively block out news stories that are about women child
killers/abducters. Absolutely convinced that there's just "no way" a
woman could ~possibly~ do such a thing.
To put it bluntly...yer a female chauvinistic pig on all accounts.
--
Onideus Mad Hatter
mhm ¹ x ¹
http://www.backwater-productions.net
http://www.uncensored-inter.net
Hatter Quotes
-------------
"Freedom, true freedom, is nothing more than intellectual advantage over others."
"When I listen to people I don't really listen to what it is they're
saying, so much as what they're saying it for."
"Don't ever fuck with someone who has more creativity than you do."
"You're only one of the best if you're striving to become one of the
best."
"I didn't make reality, Sunshine, I just verbally bitch slapped you
with it."
"I'm not a professional, I'm an artist."
"Usenet Filters - Learn to shut yourself the fuck up!"
"Drugs killed Jesus you know...oh wait, no, that was the Jews, my
bad."
"The more I learn the more I'm killing my idols."
"Is it wrong to incur and then use the hate ridden, vengeful stupidity
of complete strangers in random Usenet froups to further my art?"
"Freedom is only a concept, like race it's merely a social construct
that doesn't really exist outside of your ability to convince others
of its relevancy."
"Next time slow up a lil, then maybe you won't jump the gun and start
creamin yer panties before it's time to pop the champagne proper."
"Reality is directly proportionate to how creative you are."
"People are pretty fucking high on themselves if they think that
they're just born with a soul. *snicker*...yeah, like they're just
givin em out for free."
"How sad that you're such a poor judge of style that you can't even
properly gauge the artistic worth of your own efforts."
"Those who record history are those who control history."
"I am the living embodiment of hell itself in all its tormentive rage,
endless suffering, unfathomable pain and unending horror...but you
don't get sent to me...I come for you."
"Ideally in a fight I'd want a BGM-109A with a W80 250 kiloton
tactical thermonuclear fusion based war head."
"Tell me, would you describe yourself more as a process or a
function?"
"Apparently this group has got the market cornered on stupid.
Intelligence is down 137 points across the board and the forecast
indicates an increase in Webtv users."
"Is my .sig delimiter broken? Really? You're sure? Awww,
gee...that's too bad...for YOU!" `, )
==============================================================================
TOPIC: Alright, Listen Up Morons
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.design.graphics/t/4750a1257dc9498f?hl=en
==============================================================================
== 1 of 6 ==
Date: Wed, Jun 17 2009 8:47 am
From: Bob Larter
pandora wrote:
> On Tue, 16 Jun 2009 14:52:57 +1000, Bob Larter wrote:
>
>> Onideus Mad Hatter wrote:
>>> On Fri, 12 Jun 2009 17:37:10 +1000, Bob Larter <bobbylarter@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> As always, I'm a retarded faggot. I love the way he knows that going
>>> into a posting frenzy on hundreds of week-old posts drives me up the
>>> fuckin wall.
>>>
>>> Technically speaking I had help,
>> What, from your left hand?
>>
>>> so not exactly the "posting frenzy"
>>> you'd like to imagine there, Whinel. That and I actively utilize
>>> backbuilding tactics. Basically replying to posts a they come in, but
>>> rather than sending them off right away I save them all up over the
>>> course of a week or so and then slam you all at once. It's very
>>> effective in keeping you feeling defeated and unable to contend. ^__^
>> Pfft. I just skipped through most of them. It's not like many people are
>> going to read followups to old posts.
>
> Indeed. It would seem he has a rather inflated view of himself and his
> posting. Don't know why as most of what he posts seems awfully tiresome.
Not to mention repetitive...
--
W
. | ,. w , "Some people are alive only because
\|/ \|/ it is illegal to kill them." Perna condita delenda est
---^----^---------------------------------------------------------------
== 2 of 6 ==
Date: Wed, Jun 17 2009 8:47 am
From: Bob Larter
ah wrote:
> Bob Larter wrote:
>> ah wrote:
>>> Bob Larter wrote:
>>>> ah wrote:
>>>>> Bob Larter wrote:
>>>>>> ah wrote:
>>>>>>> Bob Larter wrote:
>>>>>>>> ah wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Bob Larter wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> ah wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> Onideus Mad Hatter wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 02 Jun 2009 05:19:03 +1000, Bob Larter <bobbylarter@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> miguel wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 01 Jun 2009 10:46:15 -0700, Onideus Mad Hatter
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <usenet@backwater-productions.net> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 01 Jun 2009 10:20:13 -0700, miguel <mungge@mungge.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 01 Jun 2009 10:13:42 -0700, Onideus Mad Hatter
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <usenet@backwater-productions.net> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 01 Jun 2009 12:52:28 -0400, Sweetness
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <sweetchixorHATESP4MMY@yahoo.ca> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Onideus Mad Hatter wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You only get this warning just once a year and you're getting it now
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> so I'd pay the fuck attention if I were you. That article up on
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Special ED about me? Yeah, you know the one.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You mean this one?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.encyclopediadramatica.com/Onideus_Mad_Hatter
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That's the one you mean, right?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Pleace to be makings a special butthurtz page for me on yer ghey lil
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> blog now, Mathilda. OKTHXBYE
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Do you even *HAVE* any pictures of yourself online? Also the tactic
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is meant more for Webbies and RLs, not so much Netters...which is why
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I post the warning here rather than on my blog. I don't want to make
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it ~too~ easy for the little spaz addicts to get a clue. Besides
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> which, it's *MUCH* moar fun *THIS* way.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That said, these tactics are only effective against people who can't
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> pass my MHM test and it's pretty easy to spot those types. I actually
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> had lil Waldo targeted since around 1996 since that's when I first
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> noticed how...exploitable, he was. LOL
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I've many other targets to play with as well, some moar fuckheaded
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> than others. The fuckheads at Sakuracon for example *STILL* owe me
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> $90, having only refunded me $45 of the total amount I paid for
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> entrance. I want to do something ~really~ special for them though. As
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> such I've been slowly gathering all sorts of data on them, their
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> organizers, volunteers, even their lawyers! LOL It's gonna be a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *LOT* of fun! ...well, for me anyway, not so much for them I guess
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (depending on how well they can take a joke). I just ~love~ satire,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> don't you? ^__^ Especially when it involves human emotions!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You have a dossier?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Eh...something like that. Basically I keep track of *EVERYTHING*
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> pertaining to me online, mostly through the help of my clone posters.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Most of the material is archived in the form of screen caps, which is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> absolutely necessary since most Webbies can't handle me to the point
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of invoking Hitler esque post burning tactics...which was actually one
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of the primary reasons why I create Onideus Uncensored.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In some cases, like with PoE and SASS, they completely obliterate
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> entire threads pertaining to me, simply because they wind up looking
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> stupid and don't want anyone to see. Like nyah:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> : http://www.backwater-productions.net/_images/_SASS/Deleted_And_Censored_Posts/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Of course what they don't realize is that covering up the damage I can
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> inflict on a group only serves to help me in that furthers the whole
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "baby matthew" persona and makes me look all harmless and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ineffectual...until the screaming starts anyway...and then come the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> death threats...LOL...oh how I love the death threats, such emotion!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ^__^
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> According to one Dr. Judith Orloff, who personally I think is a bit of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a kook, believes me to be some kind of "psychic vampire" (her words).
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> But I think it's more about the simple quest to bring people to my
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> level of thinking/understanding. A world where words can't hurt. A
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> world where self-actualization is as easy to reach as an unnoticeable
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> itch, where people use words not to attack, but to create
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> art...wondrous, wondrous works of art. It may never come to pass, at
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> least not within my lifetime, but I think it's important to push
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> nonetheless.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And I've been slowly amassing followers to help spread my
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> understanding, in the form of my clone posters, or my "Onten 7" group.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The number changes depending on the number of active Onten
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> members...there's actually quite a few more than that, but only seven
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> who I trust implicitly with my style to let them move about
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> unmonitored by me. This is how I often appear to be in so many
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> different froups across the grid simultaneously.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Geez.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> DiaperBoi is your classic, old-school kook. I've guided him through
>>>>>>>>>>>>> numerous kook awards over the last decade or so. If you want a good
>>>>>>>>>>>>> laugh, check out what his 'friends' have to say about him over on
>>>>>>>>>>>>> EncyclopediaDramatica:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> <http://encyclopediadramatica.com/Onideus_Mad_Hatter>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> They're a little web-orientated, but most of what they have to say about
>>>>>>>>>>>>> him is spot on. And yes, the stuff about his Adult Baby fetish is 100% true.
>>>>>>>>>>>> [128 lines of admission snipped]
>>>>>>>>>>> Nice foamage, DiaperBoi.
>>>>>>>>>> Diaperboi is the King of Foam.
>>>>>>>>> Gewg certainly was vying the the throne there for a while...
>>>>>>>> Maybe DiaperBoi could take Gweggie under his wing? Hell, he could help
>>>>>>>> find him a job getting the big bucks at WalMart, it'd give him something
>>>>>>>> to do with his days.
>>>>>>> He could even learn how to operate hweavy machinery!
>>>>>> Such as shopping twolleys!
>>>>> And fjork wifts!
>>>> And pwicing gjuns!
>>> And step wadders!
>> And wjet mjops!
> And tjime cwoks!
And cwash wegisters!
--
W
. | ,. w , "Some people are alive only because
\|/ \|/ it is illegal to kill them." Perna condita delenda est
---^----^---------------------------------------------------------------
== 3 of 6 ==
Date: Wed, Jun 17 2009 5:53 pm
From: ah
Bob Larter wrote:
> ah wrote:
>> Bob Larter wrote:
>>> ah wrote:
>>>> Bob Larter wrote:
>>>>> ah wrote:
>>>>>> Bob Larter wrote:
>>>>>>> ah wrote:
>>>>>>>> Bob Larter wrote:
>>>>>>>>> ah wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> Bob Larter wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> ah wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> Onideus Mad Hatter wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 02 Jun 2009 05:19:03 +1000, Bob Larter <bobbylarter@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> miguel wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 01 Jun 2009 10:46:15 -0700, Onideus Mad Hatter
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <usenet@backwater-productions.net> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 01 Jun 2009 10:20:13 -0700, miguel <mungge@mungge.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 01 Jun 2009 10:13:42 -0700, Onideus Mad Hatter
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <usenet@backwater-productions.net> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 01 Jun 2009 12:52:28 -0400, Sweetness
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <sweetchixorHATESP4MMY@yahoo.ca> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Onideus Mad Hatter wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You only get this warning just once a year and you're getting it now
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> so I'd pay the fuck attention if I were you. That article up on
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Special ED about me? Yeah, you know the one.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You mean this one?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.encyclopediadramatica.com/Onideus_Mad_Hatter
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That's the one you mean, right?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Pleace to be makings a special butthurtz page for me on yer ghey lil
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> blog now, Mathilda. OKTHXBYE
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Do you even *HAVE* any pictures of yourself online? Also the tactic
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is meant more for Webbies and RLs, not so much Netters...which is why
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I post the warning here rather than on my blog. I don't want to make
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it ~too~ easy for the little spaz addicts to get a clue. Besides
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> which, it's *MUCH* moar fun *THIS* way.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That said, these tactics are only effective against people who can't
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> pass my MHM test and it's pretty easy to spot those types. I actually
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> had lil Waldo targeted since around 1996 since that's when I first
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> noticed how...exploitable, he was. LOL
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I've many other targets to play with as well, some moar fuckheaded
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> than others. The fuckheads at Sakuracon for example *STILL* owe me
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> $90, having only refunded me $45 of the total amount I paid for
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> entrance. I want to do something ~really~ special for them though. As
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> such I've been slowly gathering all sorts of data on them, their
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> organizers, volunteers, even their lawyers! LOL It's gonna be a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *LOT* of fun! ...well, for me anyway, not so much for them I guess
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (depending on how well they can take a joke). I just ~love~ satire,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> don't you? ^__^ Especially when it involves human emotions!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You have a dossier?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Eh...something like that. Basically I keep track of *EVERYTHING*
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> pertaining to me online, mostly through the help of my clone posters.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Most of the material is archived in the form of screen caps, which is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> absolutely necessary since most Webbies can't handle me to the point
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of invoking Hitler esque post burning tactics...which was actually one
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of the primary reasons why I create Onideus Uncensored.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In some cases, like with PoE and SASS, they completely obliterate
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> entire threads pertaining to me, simply because they wind up looking
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> stupid and don't want anyone to see. Like nyah:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> : http://www.backwater-productions.net/_images/_SASS/Deleted_And_Censored_Posts/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Of course what they don't realize is that covering up the damage I can
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> inflict on a group only serves to help me in that furthers the whole
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "baby matthew" persona and makes me look all harmless and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ineffectual...until the screaming starts anyway...and then come the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> death threats...LOL...oh how I love the death threats, such emotion!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ^__^
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> According to one Dr. Judith Orloff, who personally I think is a bit of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a kook, believes me to be some kind of "psychic vampire" (her words).
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> But I think it's more about the simple quest to bring people to my
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> level of thinking/understanding. A world where words can't hurt. A
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> world where self-actualization is as easy to reach as an unnoticeable
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> itch, where people use words not to attack, but to create
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> art...wondrous, wondrous works of art. It may never come to pass, at
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> least not within my lifetime, but I think it's important to push
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> nonetheless.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And I've been slowly amassing followers to help spread my
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> understanding, in the form of my clone posters, or my "Onten 7" group.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The number changes depending on the number of active Onten
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> members...there's actually quite a few more than that, but only seven
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> who I trust implicitly with my style to let them move about
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> unmonitored by me. This is how I often appear to be in so many
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> different froups across the grid simultaneously.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Geez.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> DiaperBoi is your classic, old-school kook. I've guided him through
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> numerous kook awards over the last decade or so. If you want a good
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> laugh, check out what his 'friends' have to say about him over on
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> EncyclopediaDramatica:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <http://encyclopediadramatica.com/Onideus_Mad_Hatter>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> They're a little web-orientated, but most of what they have to say about
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> him is spot on. And yes, the stuff about his Adult Baby fetish is 100% true.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> [128 lines of admission snipped]
>>>>>>>>>>>> Nice foamage, DiaperBoi.
>>>>>>>>>>> Diaperboi is the King of Foam.
>>>>>>>>>> Gewg certainly was vying the the throne there for a while...
>>>>>>>>> Maybe DiaperBoi could take Gweggie under his wing? Hell, he could help
>>>>>>>>> find him a job getting the big bucks at WalMart, it'd give him something
>>>>>>>>> to do with his days.
>>>>>>>> He could even learn how to operate hweavy machinery!
>>>>>>> Such as shopping twolleys!
>>>>>> And fjork wifts!
>>>>> And pwicing gjuns!
>>>> And step wadders!
>>> And wjet mjops!
>> And tjime cwoks!
>
> And cwash wegisters!
And inwentory scjanners!
--
ah
== 4 of 6 ==
Date: Wed, Jun 17 2009 5:54 pm
From: ah
Bob Larter wrote:
> pandora wrote:
>> On Tue, 16 Jun 2009 14:52:57 +1000, Bob Larter wrote:
>>
>>> Onideus Mad Hatter wrote:
>>>> On Fri, 12 Jun 2009 17:37:10 +1000, Bob Larter <bobbylarter@gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> As always, I'm a retarded faggot. I love the way he knows that going
>>>> into a posting frenzy on hundreds of week-old posts drives me up the
>>>> fuckin wall.
>>>>
>>>> Technically speaking I had help,
>>> What, from your left hand?
>>>
>>>> so not exactly the "posting frenzy"
>>>> you'd like to imagine there, Whinel. That and I actively utilize
>>>> backbuilding tactics. Basically replying to posts a they come in, but
>>>> rather than sending them off right away I save them all up over the
>>>> course of a week or so and then slam you all at once. It's very
>>>> effective in keeping you feeling defeated and unable to contend. ^__^
>>> Pfft. I just skipped through most of them. It's not like many people are
>>> going to read followups to old posts.
>>
>> Indeed. It would seem he has a rather inflated view of himself and his
>> posting. Don't know why as most of what he posts seems awfully tiresome.
>
> Not to mention repetitive...
Not to mention self-absorbed...
--
ah
== 5 of 6 ==
Date: Wed, Jun 17 2009 5:56 pm
From: ah
Onideus Mad Hatter wrote:
> On Thu, 11 Jun 2009 22:33:48 -0400, ah <splifingate@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>Onideus Mad Hatter wrote:
>>> On Tue, 02 Jun 2009 22:08:27 -0400, ah <splifingate@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>Onideus Mad Hatter wrote:
>>>>> On Tue, 02 Jun 2009 05:19:03 +1000, Bob Larter <bobbylarter@gmail.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>miguel wrote:
>>>>>>> On Mon, 01 Jun 2009 10:46:15 -0700, Onideus Mad Hatter
>>>>>>> <usenet@backwater-productions.net> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Mon, 01 Jun 2009 10:20:13 -0700, miguel <mungge@mungge.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 01 Jun 2009 10:13:42 -0700, Onideus Mad Hatter
>>>>>>>>> <usenet@backwater-productions.net> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 01 Jun 2009 12:52:28 -0400, Sweetness
>>>>>>>>>> <sweetchixorHATESP4MMY@yahoo.ca> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Onideus Mad Hatter wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> You only get this warning just once a year and you're getting it now
>>>>>>>>>>>> so I'd pay the fuck attention if I were you. That article up on
>>>>>>>>>>>> Special ED about me? Yeah, you know the one.
>>>>>>>>>>> You mean this one?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.encyclopediadramatica.com/Onideus_Mad_Hatter
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> That's the one you mean, right?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Pleace to be makings a special butthurtz page for me on yer ghey lil
>>>>>>>>>>> blog now, Mathilda. OKTHXBYE
>>>>>>>>>> Do you even *HAVE* any pictures of yourself online? Also the tactic
>>>>>>>>>> is meant more for Webbies and RLs, not so much Netters...which is why
>>>>>>>>>> I post the warning here rather than on my blog. I don't want to make
>>>>>>>>>> it ~too~ easy for the little spaz addicts to get a clue. Besides
>>>>>>>>>> which, it's *MUCH* moar fun *THIS* way.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> That said, these tactics are only effective against people who can't
>>>>>>>>>> pass my MHM test and it's pretty easy to spot those types. I actually
>>>>>>>>>> had lil Waldo targeted since around 1996 since that's when I first
>>>>>>>>>> noticed how...exploitable, he was. LOL
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I've many other targets to play with as well, some moar fuckheaded
>>>>>>>>>> than others. The fuckheads at Sakuracon for example *STILL* owe me
>>>>>>>>>> $90, having only refunded me $45 of the total amount I paid for
>>>>>>>>>> entrance. I want to do something ~really~ special for them though. As
>>>>>>>>>> such I've been slowly gathering all sorts of data on them, their
>>>>>>>>>> organizers, volunteers, even their lawyers! LOL It's gonna be a
>>>>>>>>>> *LOT* of fun! ...well, for me anyway, not so much for them I guess
>>>>>>>>>> (depending on how well they can take a joke). I just ~love~ satire,
>>>>>>>>>> don't you? ^__^ Especially when it involves human emotions!
>>>>>>>>> You have a dossier?
>>>>>>>> Eh...something like that. Basically I keep track of *EVERYTHING*
>>>>>>>> pertaining to me online, mostly through the help of my clone posters.
>>>>>>>> Most of the material is archived in the form of screen caps, which is
>>>>>>>> absolutely necessary since most Webbies can't handle me to the point
>>>>>>>> of invoking Hitler esque post burning tactics...which was actually one
>>>>>>>> of the primary reasons why I create Onideus Uncensored.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> In some cases, like with PoE and SASS, they completely obliterate
>>>>>>>> entire threads pertaining to me, simply because they wind up looking
>>>>>>>> stupid and don't want anyone to see. Like nyah:
>>>>>>>> : http://www.backwater-productions.net/_images/_SASS/Deleted_And_Censored_Posts/
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Of course what they don't realize is that covering up the damage I can
>>>>>>>> inflict on a group only serves to help me in that furthers the whole
>>>>>>>> "baby matthew" persona and makes me look all harmless and
>>>>>>>> ineffectual...until the screaming starts anyway...and then come the
>>>>>>>> death threats...LOL...oh how I love the death threats, such emotion!
>>>>>>>> ^__^
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> According to one Dr. Judith Orloff, who personally I think is a bit of
>>>>>>>> a kook, believes me to be some kind of "psychic vampire" (her words).
>>>>>>>> But I think it's more about the simple quest to bring people to my
>>>>>>>> level of thinking/understanding. A world where words can't hurt. A
>>>>>>>> world where self-actualization is as easy to reach as an unnoticeable
>>>>>>>> itch, where people use words not to attack, but to create
>>>>>>>> art...wondrous, wondrous works of art. It may never come to pass, at
>>>>>>>> least not within my lifetime, but I think it's important to push
>>>>>>>> nonetheless.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> And I've been slowly amassing followers to help spread my
>>>>>>>> understanding, in the form of my clone posters, or my "Onten 7" group.
>>>>>>>> The number changes depending on the number of active Onten
>>>>>>>> members...there's actually quite a few more than that, but only seven
>>>>>>>> who I trust implicitly with my style to let them move about
>>>>>>>> unmonitored by me. This is how I often appear to be in so many
>>>>>>>> different froups across the grid simultaneously.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Geez.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>DiaperBoi is your classic, old-school kook. I've guided him through
>>>>>>numerous kook awards over the last decade or so. If you want a good
>>>>>>laugh, check out what his 'friends' have to say about him over on
>>>>>>EncyclopediaDramatica:
>>>>>><http://encyclopediadramatica.com/Onideus_Mad_Hatter>
>>>>>>They're a little web-orientated, but most of what they have to say about
>>>>>>him is spot on. And yes, the stuff about his Adult Baby fetish is 100% true.
>>>>>
>>>>> [128 lines of admission snipped]
>>>>
>>>>Ni<WHACK>
>>>
>>> If I had wanted any shit out of you I would have squeezed yer fat ugly
>>> head, Dipshit.
>
>>I'm hittin' on all three cylinders, like my mother, Shitlips.
>
> ...that's no way to talk about yer mother, d00d.
I know why you're stooping so low, but I'm afraid I don't swing that way.
--
ah
== 6 of 6 ==
Date: Wed, Jun 17 2009 7:52 pm
From: Bob Larter
ah wrote:
> Bob Larter wrote:
>> ah wrote:
>>> Bob Larter wrote:
>>>> ah wrote:
>>>>> Bob Larter wrote:
>>>>>> ah wrote:
>>>>>>> Bob Larter wrote:
>>>>>>>> ah wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Bob Larter wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> ah wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> Bob Larter wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> ah wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Onideus Mad Hatter wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 02 Jun 2009 05:19:03 +1000, Bob Larter <bobbylarter@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> miguel wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 01 Jun 2009 10:46:15 -0700, Onideus Mad Hatter
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <usenet@backwater-productions.net> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 01 Jun 2009 10:20:13 -0700, miguel <mungge@mungge.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 01 Jun 2009 10:13:42 -0700, Onideus Mad Hatter
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <usenet@backwater-productions.net> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 01 Jun 2009 12:52:28 -0400, Sweetness
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <sweetchixorHATESP4MMY@yahoo.ca> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Onideus Mad Hatter wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You only get this warning just once a year and you're getting it now
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> so I'd pay the fuck attention if I were you. That article up on
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Special ED about me? Yeah, you know the one.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You mean this one?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.encyclopediadramatica.com/Onideus_Mad_Hatter
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That's the one you mean, right?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Pleace to be makings a special butthurtz page for me on yer ghey lil
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> blog now, Mathilda. OKTHXBYE
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Do you even *HAVE* any pictures of yourself online? Also the tactic
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is meant more for Webbies and RLs, not so much Netters...which is why
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I post the warning here rather than on my blog. I don't want to make
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it ~too~ easy for the little spaz addicts to get a clue. Besides
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> which, it's *MUCH* moar fun *THIS* way.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That said, these tactics are only effective against people who can't
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> pass my MHM test and it's pretty easy to spot those types. I actually
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> had lil Waldo targeted since around 1996 since that's when I first
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> noticed how...exploitable, he was. LOL
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I've many other targets to play with as well, some moar fuckheaded
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> than others. The fuckheads at Sakuracon for example *STILL* owe me
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> $90, having only refunded me $45 of the total amount I paid for
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> entrance. I want to do something ~really~ special for them though. As
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> such I've been slowly gathering all sorts of data on them, their
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> organizers, volunteers, even their lawyers! LOL It's gonna be a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *LOT* of fun! ...well, for me anyway, not so much for them I guess
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (depending on how well they can take a joke). I just ~love~ satire,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> don't you? ^__^ Especially when it involves human emotions!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You have a dossier?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Eh...something like that. Basically I keep track of *EVERYTHING*
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> pertaining to me online, mostly through the help of my clone posters.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Most of the material is archived in the form of screen caps, which is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> absolutely necessary since most Webbies can't handle me to the point
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of invoking Hitler esque post burning tactics...which was actually one
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of the primary reasons why I create Onideus Uncensored.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In some cases, like with PoE and SASS, they completely obliterate
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> entire threads pertaining to me, simply because they wind up looking
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> stupid and don't want anyone to see. Like nyah:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> : http://www.backwater-productions.net/_images/_SASS/Deleted_And_Censored_Posts/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Of course what they don't realize is that covering up the damage I can
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> inflict on a group only serves to help me in that furthers the whole
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "baby matthew" persona and makes me look all harmless and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ineffectual...until the screaming starts anyway...and then come the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> death threats...LOL...oh how I love the death threats, such emotion!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ^__^
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> According to one Dr. Judith Orloff, who personally I think is a bit of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a kook, believes me to be some kind of "psychic vampire" (her words).
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> But I think it's more about the simple quest to bring people to my
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> level of thinking/understanding. A world where words can't hurt. A
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> world where self-actualization is as easy to reach as an unnoticeable
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> itch, where people use words not to attack, but to create
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> art...wondrous, wondrous works of art. It may never come to pass, at
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> least not within my lifetime, but I think it's important to push
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> nonetheless.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And I've been slowly amassing followers to help spread my
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> understanding, in the form of my clone posters, or my "Onten 7" group.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The number changes depending on the number of active Onten
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> members...there's actually quite a few more than that, but only seven
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> who I trust implicitly with my style to let them move about
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> unmonitored by me. This is how I often appear to be in so many
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> different froups across the grid simultaneously.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Geez.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> DiaperBoi is your classic, old-school kook. I've guided him through
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> numerous kook awards over the last decade or so. If you want a good
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> laugh, check out what his 'friends' have to say about him over on
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> EncyclopediaDramatica:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <http://encyclopediadramatica.com/Onideus_Mad_Hatter>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> They're a little web-orientated, but most of what they have to say about
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> him is spot on. And yes, the stuff about his Adult Baby fetish is 100% true.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [128 lines of admission snipped]
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Nice foamage, DiaperBoi.
>>>>>>>>>>>> Diaperboi is the King of Foam.
>>>>>>>>>>> Gewg certainly was vying the the throne there for a while...
>>>>>>>>>> Maybe DiaperBoi could take Gweggie under his wing? Hell, he could help
>>>>>>>>>> find him a job getting the big bucks at WalMart, it'd give him something
>>>>>>>>>> to do with his days.
>>>>>>>>> He could even learn how to operate hweavy machinery!
>>>>>>>> Such as shopping twolleys!
>>>>>>> And fjork wifts!
>>>>>> And pwicing gjuns!
>>>>> And step wadders!
>>>> And wjet mjops!
>>> And tjime cwoks!
>> And cwash wegisters!
> And inwentory scjanners!
And pubwic-addwess sithtems!
--
W
. | ,. w , "Some people are alive only because
\|/ \|/ it is illegal to kill them." Perna condita delenda est
---^----^---------------------------------------------------------------
==============================================================================
TOPIC: New Micro-PhotoStock
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.design.graphics/t/ac72e5ec94b11d96?hl=en
==============================================================================
== 1 of 1 ==
Date: Wed, Jun 17 2009 10:52 am
From: pixel
Small but unique photo stock at prices you can manage. The best
quality images for use in internet and publication. pigment prints
recomended.
www.pixelfix.eu
==============================================================================
TOPIC: Logo Design Contest?
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.design.graphics/t/c2db836778c55bb5?hl=en
==============================================================================
== 1 of 1 ==
Date: Wed, Jun 17 2009 3:15 pm
From: Bluuuue Rajah
Rose <Roseb44170@aol.com> wrote in news:b2849b90-e0b4-42cc-b965-
ca399561af00@y17g2000yqn.googlegroups.com:
> I found this contest while online! While it is not my cup of tea
> someone else here may be interested in it?
>
> On a personal note I think that they are being a little cheap for a
> logo design but even so - so far they have got about 7 or 8 designs
> entered.
>
> The link is on my blog post:
>
> http://roseb44170.blogspot.com/2009/06/logo-design-contest.html
Twenty bucks?! I blow my nose for more than that!
==============================================================================
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "alt.design.graphics"
group.
To post to this group, visit http://groups.google.com/group/alt.design.graphics?hl=en
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to alt.design.graphics+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
To change the way you get mail from this group, visit:
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.design.graphics/subscribe?hl=en
To report abuse, send email explaining the problem to abuse@googlegroups.com
==============================================================================
Google Groups: http://groups.google.com/?hl=en
0 comments:
Post a Comment